Jobs, Entrepreneurship, Business trend, and related news

‘Work Hard, Play Hard’ Is Over: Inside Silicon Valley’s 996 Culture​

By Dasha Shunina,

Contributor.
Dasha Shunina is a San Francisco-based contributor who covers VC


Jan 23, 2026, 02:36pm EST

1769417619480.png
A businesswoman staying late hours in the office concentrating on her work sitting with a laptop and typing.
getty

A recent job posting on LinkedIn reads:

“We’re hiring our first BDRs.

Since launch last week, we’ve been lucky enough to see our pipeline grow faster than we can handle—and we need help.

You’d be a great fit if you:


  • want to grind (7 days a week)
  • learn fast and move fast
  • can figure things out
  • can start within the next week.”
The company is Corgi, a Y Combinator-backed startup that recently raised $108 million to build insurance for startups. And while a seven-day workweek might have once raised eyebrows, in San Francisco today, it barely registers as surprising.

We don’t care about your background or years of experience,” the posting continues. “Just that you have the drive to execute and get things done.”

When asked why, Corgi Co-founder and COO Emily Yuan is blunt: “It’s all about solving a big, important problem.”

How Has Startup Culture Changed?​

Ten years ago, startup culture looked very different.

Offices were designed to feel like playgrounds. Foosball tables, nightly happy hours and weekend parties were part of the pitch. Shared workspaces blurred into social scenes. Hookup culture was common. Burnout was romanticized, and ambition was wrapped in excess.

If you weren’t there, Netflix’s WeCrashed offers a time capsule of that era—recounting WeWork’s rise and fall, fueled by charisma, capital and an unapologetic party culture.

Those days appear to be over.

“Instead of work hard, play hard, now it’s just work hard,” says Kulveer Taggar, a two-time founder and venture capitalist, and the founder of Phosphor Capital.

Taggar, who has deep ties to the Y Combinator ecosystem, says today’s founders are fundamentally different. They don’t drink. They don’t party. Many don’t date. They optimize. They work. And they do so with an intensity that feels closer to 996—or even 997—than the Silicon Valley myth of balance.

Recently, Taggar hosted a private founder dinner and offered an array of expensive wines. No one touched them.

“I visited one portfolio company where the founder proudly showed me mattresses on the floor in every office,” Taggar says. “During interviews, they ask candidates if they’re willing to sleep at work—and people line up for jobs there.”

996 By Choice, Not Pressure​

For One Chowdhury, the 24-year-old co-founder and CEO of Octolane, the 996 schedule isn’t a badge of suffering—it’s a deliberate strategy.

“Why do I work 996?” Chowdhury asks. “It’s not about chasing burnout. It’s about chasing escape velocity.”

“At this stage, the startup doesn’t just need speed—it needs obsession,” he says. “I work like this because I choose to, not because someone forces me to. It’s ambition, not pressure.”

To Chowdhury, 996 is no longer exceptional—it’s table stakes.

“It used to be a flex. Now it’s the baseline,” he says. “The top one percent of founders design lives where the work is the reward. What looks intense from the outside is just flow state from the inside.”

The sacrifices, however, are real.

“My calendar is intentional. My sacrifices are not,” he says. “I say no to parties, weekends and sleep—not because I love pain, but because I love progress. The chaos isn’t glamorous, but the purpose is.”

“The only thing worse than 996,” he adds, “is regret.”

Why Younger Founders Are Optimizes Everything​

This new cohort doesn’t just work longer hours—they optimize their lives with scientific precision.

Chowdhury doesn’t drink alcohol—not out of discipline theater, but efficiency.

“I’m chasing momentum,” he says. “I want clarity. I’d rather remember my twenties than drink them away.”

He closely follows longevity researcher Bryan Johnson and treats his life as a continuous experiment. Inputs are measured. Outputs are refined. Even rest is reframed.

“Rest isn’t always sleep,” he says. “Sometimes it’s staring at the ceiling after shipping something you didn’t think was possible. Sometimes it’s texting your co-founder at 2 a.m. just to say, ‘We’re really doing this.”

Relationships aren’t excluded—but they must align.

“This isn’t a job,” Chowdhury says. “It’s war. There’s no balance. There’s alignment.”

The New Founder Profile Is Younger—And Higher Agency​

Cyril Gorlla, the 23-year-old co-founder and CEO of AI startup CTGT, embodies this emerging founder profile.

Gorlla left Stanford to start the company. CTGT has raised a $7.5 million seed round backed by Google and General Catalyst. The team occupies nearly 6,000 square feet in San Francisco and regularly hosts executives from Fortune 500 companies.

His schedule is relentless.

“When I’m in the office, I leave around 3 or 4 a.m.,” Gorlla says. “Then I’m back the next day.”

He doesn’t drive. He takes Waymo—because it gives him 20 more minutes of work.

He doesn’t drink alcohol. He goes to the gym to disconnect. Slack is always on.

“It doesn’t feel like work,” Gorlla says. “When you’re building something meaningful, it takes on a life of its own.”

Asked to describe the modern founder archetype, Gorlla doesn’t hesitate.

“Younger. Higher agency,” he says. “That’s the shift.”

He points to resumes from teenagers who have already published research papers—and to a widening gap between high-agency and low-agency builders.

“That’s the real divide now,” he says. “Not age. Not privilege. Agency.”

Not Burnout—But Control​

Unlike founders who have just dropped out of college, Upeka Bee brings years of experience building engineering teams at Gusto.

Not all founders in this era subscribe to maximalist schedules—but even those who prioritize health still reject the old party culture.

Bee, the Founder and CEO of DianaHR (YC W24)—an AI-powered HR-as-a-Service platform for small businesses—works relentlessly, but deliberately.

“I train like an athlete,” Bee says. “I work out multiple times a week. I meditate daily. I protect my sleep because that’s how I perform at my best.”

She doesn’t drink alcohol—not out of abstinence culture, but longevity.

“It makes me tired. It dehydrates me. It ages me,” she says. “Your body is the best instrument you have.”

Bee is married, deeply involved in her community and a longtime Burning Man participant. She doesn’t romanticize isolation—but she’s honest about the tradeoffs.

“I don’t have work-life balance,” she says. “I have no food in my fridge. I’m mostly at the office.”

Still, she insists that occasional joy is non-negotiable.

“If I don’t see friends, I burn out,” she says. “You don’t need alcohol to dance. You don’t need excess to feel alive.”

DianaHR recently announced a $3.7 million seed round led by SNR Ventures, with participation from General Catalyst, Y Combinator and unicorn founders including those from Mercury, Twitch and Dropbox.

Do We All Have To Keep Up?​

This isn’t a prescription—and it isn’t sustainable for everyone.

What is clear is that startup culture has fundamentally changed. The performative perks are gone. The parties have quieted. The work remains.

This new generation of founders isn’t chasing vibes. They’re chasing velocity. And for better or worse, 996 is no longer an anomaly—it’s an option.

The question founders now face isn’t whether this pace is healthy. It’s whether it’s the right one for them.

Editorial StandardsReprints & Permissions

Find Dasha Shunina on LinkedIn.

 
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Source :

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Steve Jobs on how to hire the best people at your company
Absolutely timeless advice that still rings true today>

hire high agency people> give them high agency tasks> the job of a leader is to create common vision, not micro manage> once you have enough great people together in a team, they tend to build groups where mediocre people cannot enter or are quickly pushed out>

the main job of a CEO is ultimately recruiting> professional managers can manage well, but they cannot do anything incredible by themselves> great people work for the best do-ers, not the best managers
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Most people are terrified AI will take their jobs because they confuse their tasks with their purpose.Jensen Huang explains it perfectly: If you watched a CEO all day, you would think their job is "typist" because they spend most of their time typing emails.

If AI automates typing, the CEO doesn't lose their job. They just have more time to lead.The same applies to everyone. When AI automates the tasks, it enhances the purpose.Stop measuring your value by your to-do list. Your value is the purpose behind it.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Mark Zuckerberg on the best advice Peter Thiel ever gave him“Peter was the person who told me this really pithy quote that, ‘In a world that’s changing so quickly, the biggest risk you can take is not taking any risk.’

And I really think that that is true.”


Mark continues:

“Whenever you get yourself into a position where you have to make some big shift in direction or do something, there are always people who are going to point to the downside risks of that decision — and locally they may be right.

For any given decision you make, there’s upside and downside. But in aggregate, if you are stagnant and you don’t make those changes, then I think you’re guaranteed to fail and not catch up. So to some degree, I think it’s really right that, over time, the biggest risk you can take is to not take any risks.”Video source:
@ycombinator
(2016)
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Job seekers in the U.S. and many other nations face a tough environment. At the same time, fears of AI-caused job loss have — so far — been overblown. However, the demand for AI skills is starting to cause shifts in the job market. I’d like to share what I’m seeing on the ground.

First, many tech companies have laid off workers over the past year. While some CEOs cited AI as the reason — that AI is doing the work, so people are no longer needed — the reality is AI just doesn’t work that well yet. Many of the layoffs have been corrections for overhiring during the pandemic or general cost-cutting and reorganization that occasionally happened even before modern AI.

Outside of a handful of roles, few layoffs have resulted from jobs being automated by AI.Granted, this may grow in the future. People who are currently in some professions that are highly exposed to AI automation, such as call-center operators, translators, and voice actors, are likely to struggle to find jobs and/or see declining salaries. But widespread job losses have been overhyped.

Instead, a common refrain applies: AI won’t replace workers, but workers who use AI will replace workers who don’t. For instance, because AI coding tools make developers much more efficient, developers who know how to use them are increasingly in-demand. (If you want to be one of these people, please take our short courses on Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and Agentic Skills!)So AI is leading to job losses, but in a subtle way.

Some businesses are letting go of employees who are not adapting to AI and replacing them with people who are. This trend is already obvious in software development. Further, in many startups’ hiring patterns, I am seeing early signs of this type of personnel replacement in roles that traditionally are considered non-technical.

Marketers, recruiters, and analysts who know how to code with AI are more productive than those who don’t, so some businesses are slowly parting ways with employees that aren’t able to adapt. I expect this will accelerate.

At the same time, when companies build new teams that are AI native, sometimes the new teams are smaller than the ones they replace. AI makes individuals more effective, and this makes it possible to shrink team sizes. For example, as AI has made building software easier, the bottleneck is shifting to deciding what to build — this is the Product Management (PM) bottleneck.

A project that used to be assigned to 8 engineers and 1 PM might now be assigned to 2 engineers and 1 PM, or perhaps even to a single person with a mix of engineering and product skills.The good news for employees is that most businesses have a lot of work to do and not enough people to do it.

People with the right AI skills are often given opportunities to step up and do more, and maybe tackle the long backlog of ideas that couldn’t be executed before AI made the work go more quickly. I’m seeing many employees in many businesses step up to build new things that help their business. Opportunities abound!I know these changes are stressful.

My heart goes out to every family that has been affected by a layoff, to every job seeker struggling to find the role they want, and to the far larger number of people who are worried about their future job prospects. Fortunately, there’s still time to learn and position yourself well for where the job market is going.

When it comes to AI, the vast majority of people, technical or nontechnical, are at the starting line, or they were recently. So this remains a great time to keep learning and keep building, and the opportunities for those who do are numerous![Original text; https://deeplearning.ai/the-batch/issue-339/ ]
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top