hyperman
INT'L MOD
insult Iran and Hezbollah
I haven't insulted anyone.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
insult Iran and Hezbollah
Hezbollah cannot fight a nation state like Israel without support. In late 2000's, the IRGC did start a policy of training their allies in weapons making and you see the greatest success of that with the Houthis, however there are limits to what a group or even a militia can build.Why? does Hezbollah not have capacity without Syria? If thats true, then it would make what the Hezbollah haters in Lebanon say correct, that Hezbollah is not independent and not capable of being independent and reliant on patronage from Iran or Syria to function.
Can Hezbollah not be effective without HTS backing?
Whats all this Shia Crescent stuff? lol, whats that have to do with Syria? Why does a majority Sunni state have to be involved in this? Iran's strategy shouldn't be reliant on trying to subjugate or demographically manipulate a Sunni Majority state. thats not a reasonable outlook to have. Alternatively someone could say hey maybe Safavids were the ones who "broke up" the Sunni Continuity that goes from Khorasan/Hind to Palestine or even further.
Yes I know Iraqi PMU fired a few drones at the Golan and then quit. I call that tokenism. After all Iran did for them against ISIS, and still does for them, it was a very poor return on investment. Now it is reported same PMU is playing Iran against the US/Iraqi govt to see where it gets most benefits.
Every war would be a war on Israel's terms because Hezbollah stakeholders are corrupt people. Money corrupts people. They weren't prepared for a round of fighting with Israel despite having not fought from 2006 to 2023. It's not 4D chess or anything. We have to put aside ego and pride. Hezbollah doesn't have a master plan or know what's it's doing or it knows best. It doesn't know best.Ridiculous. That would be a war on Israel's terms when Hezbollah is only starting to recover from the last war.
Hezbollah cannot fight a nation state like Israel without support. In late 2000's, the IRGC did start a policy of training their allies in weapons making and you see the greatest success of that with the Houthis, however there are limits to what a group or even a militia can build.
The rest of your comments about Iran forcing "demographic changes" in Syria is the usual Wahabi/Salafi BS.
If they weren't ready to fight for their terms after 17 years ceasefire then they will never be ready.
Houthis are ruling Yemen, Hezbollah has never ruled Lebanon. Hezbollah also got into a direct war with Israel and had most of its facilities and ammunition destroyed. To expect that group to now resume fighting Israel without any outside support is non-feasible.Of course they can, they have the sea, If the Houthis can do it, Hezbollah with far larger resources can do it. Besides they have had a corridor from Iran for 20+ years since Saddan fell, surely they made some extensive infrastructure and tech upgrades, to produce in Lebanon.
Yes famous "Wahabi" publication called "the Guardian". lol, there is literal demographics data before the war and during the end, showing the demographics changes that happened in Syria with the expulsion of refugees, the overwhelming amount of whom were sunnis, as well as documentation of Assad/Iran moving Twelves in to Damascus and the border regions between Syria and Lebanon.
![]()
Iran repopulates Syria with Shia Muslims to help tighten regime's control
New communities are settling in areas where Sunnis have fled or been forced out as Tehran seeks an arc of control stretching from its borders to Israelwww.theguardian.com
edit: More "wahabi" sources
Syrian Observatory for Human Rights
Houthis are ruling Yemen, Hezbollah has never ruled Lebanon.
most of its facilities and ammunition
The articles you mention are Western propaganda about the "Shia crescent" via publications and NGOs. What actually happened is that some members of Fatimeyoun and Zainabiyoun militias who were recruited from Afghanistan/Pakistan were allowed to settle in Syria after the fighting ended. This was portrayed by Westerners as "forcing demographic changes". No such allegations are made about the Chechens or North Caucus fighters who did the same.
Foreign Policy magazine ?? That is the paper of the The Blob (foreign policy establishment) of the US. It is going to write articles supporting the Western policy of intervening in Syrian civil war and bringing a Western puppet to power there. I dont think you understand how Western media discreetly supports the foreign policy of its govts....and also how NGO's are utilized in pursuit of same foreign policy. Occasional dissenting articles are allowed to maintain image of a free press.No, they are not, you are unfamiliar with the Dynamics of Yemen. Houthis are largely restricted to the Zaidi Areas of Yemen, just like Hezbollah is restricted to the largely Shia areas of Lebanon. They are only ruling their areas, which defacto Hezbollah also does in its areas. Arguably Hezbollah has more control as it has a presence in Beirut in Dahiya specfically.
Most of Hezbollah's facilities underground and in the mountains of lebanon are intact. So you are wrong again.
Again, it shows you didn't read the articles I linked. There is literal demographics data showing the amount of expelled and displaced Syrian and them being disproportionately sunni, It shows that the land they left behind was taken by the state under assad, confiscated and given to "more loyal people", both internally in Syria, as well as Iran moving people into those lands. The effect was enough so that, the demographics data was showing the trend that Sunnis were no longer a majority and only a plurality or at 50% depending on the different sources of information. This is from the pre war period where they were vastly higher.
The articles I linked also detail the culture of damascus changing, it even spoke of Twelver proselytization and Iran literally paying people to convert. Foreign Policy mag for example interviews several sunnis in the Dier Ez Zor area that had converted out of a need for money.
![]()
Iran Is Trying to Convert Syria to Shiism
Ten years after entering Syria’s civil war, Tehran is using religion to make its influence there permanent.foreignpolicy.com
even the most 'disappointing' faction of the Resistance is a million times less disappointing than TurkeyYep, the PMUs are by far the most disappointing faction of the "resistance", Even the Houthis under siege never stopped firing, Hezbollah fought extensively, but the one faction that has more manpower capacity than any faction and a literal border with Iran for supplies, refuses to fight, only doing local corruption.
they fired a large number of drones for months, they were mostly intercepted given the distanceYes I know Iraqi PMU fired a few drones at the Golan and then quit. I call that tokenism. After all Iran did for them against ISIS, and still does for them, it was a very poor return on investment. Now it is reported same PMU is playing Iran against the US/Iraqi govt to see where it gets most benefits.
they were prepared for 2023 but Israel was better prepared since it is a state with the full and unconditional backing of a world superpowerEvery war would be a war on Israel's terms because Hezbollah stakeholders are corrupt people. Money corrupts people. They weren't prepared for a round of fighting with Israel despite having not fought from 2006 to 2023. It's not 4D chess or anything. We have to put aside ego and pride. Hezbollah doesn't have a master plan or know what's it's doing or it knows best. It doesn't know best.
If they weren't ready to fight for their terms after 17 years ceasefire then they will never be ready.
Foreign Policy magazine ?? That is the paper of the The Blob (foreign policy establishment) of the US. It is going to write articles supporting the Western policy of intervening in Syrian civil war and bringing a Western puppet to power there. I dont think you understand how Western media discreetly supports the foreign policy of its govts....and also how NGO's are utilized in pursuit of same foreign policy. Occasional dissenting articles are allowed to maintain image of a free press.
Regarding Yemen, the Houthis control its most important parts and rule over the majority population. Only the South which is out of their control and has Aden is significant. Eastern Yemen is empty and irrelevant. Houthis have also been the most successful in IRGC policy of enabling its allies to build its own weapons. That does not mean every other group can be just as successful.
hezbollah has never ruled Lebanon or even the areas where the Shia live. Its prominent of course but not a ruler. Hezbollah never had more than a certain share of seats in the Lebanese parliament and has to practice politics the same way as everybody else. You believe a few underground facilities in Bekaa or South Lebanon is enough to fight Israel but in reality, thats not the case.
even the most 'disappointing' faction of the Resistance is a million times less disappointing than Turkey
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.