With all due respect, I don't expect Iran to enter into alliances with NATO or states aligned with Kushner's agenda. That is precisely why Iran has never joined the Zionist-led "board of peace." Iran has consistently stayed away from anything that even remotely appears to be under U.S. or Israeli influence.
Recently, Erdoğan, whose government continues to supply fuel to Israeli fighter jets, condemned Ansarallah in Yemen for its operations in the Red Sea. Yet we heard no condemnation of Saudi Arabia when it attacked Sanaa Airport, no condemnation of the Saudi blockade of Yemeni ports that has lasted for over a decade, and no condemnation of Saudi Arabia's support for U.S. military operations against Iran or the recent Saudi-American attacks in Iraq.
Following the recent NATO summit and the red-carpet reception for war criminal Trump, it appears that the "NATO Sultan" is increasingly fishing sectarian waters.
However, this will not alter the determined, independent, and anti-imperialist course pursued by Yemen, Iran, and their broader allies, which progresses in the background.
This agreement could fit into a broader U.S. strategy to provoke a confrontation with Iran by targeting Iranian infrastructure, expecting Iran to retaliate against Saudi infrastructure, whereafter U.S. and Israel hope to encourage a coordinated response by Pakistan, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia against Iran.
Ofcourse I hope I'm totally wrong and that Turkey and Pakistan stay neutral as always when it comes to a potential future conflict between Iran and Saudi Arabia.