Men’s Asia Cup

Boycott India not only cricket but all sports.

  • Yes I agree

  • No I don't agree


Results are only viewable after voting.
Nothing wrong with celebrating like that.
induans are going to find something in our everything.
We need to stop caring what Indians think about us
It was simply cheap, and immature.
 
Listen, don't talk rubbish.

If you have any evidence - do share.

But don't go 'bout blowing rainbows out of your rear just 'cause you're anti-Military.

For the record:
accidental CoAS = accidental Handsome Pessimistic PM
Cricket is not played in battlefront nor cricket ground are for gun battles.
Rest, I can't help your manufacturing defect. Decency is not part of all people.
 
Check overall records if you dare.

Secondly, we are more than happy to play you at cricket, win or lose, but if played, the game must be played correctly, without political overtones and in a gentlemanly manner. This includes handshakes.

It is Indian players who declare that winning at cricket is somehow an "appropriate reply" for the political actions of May, where 7 Indian aircraft were shot down. We Pakistanis don't think cricket is the correct way to reply to aircraft losses, or any other political/military matter.

It is India who declared an intention to boycott and now selectively applies that policy.

It was SKY who himself acknowledged that he was following the instructions of his "government" in his presser after the first match. Would you like me to find the exact quote?

So yes my dear friend from distant gangetic plains - it is entirely correct that the Pakistan cricket team is playing the "hindutva XI", by your own captain's admission.

We can go further of course, and remind you that even notwithstanding SKY's words, the son of a sitting government minister and Modi's right hand man is very literally the head of the ICC. But you know all this already so no need for me to enlighten you.
I'll agree with you on one point - the Indian team, having made the decision to play Pakistan, should have shaken hands at the end of the game, as is customary. It was unbecoming to not do that.

The rest of your post is full of logical errors and misinferences at every step.

30+ year old records do not have a bearing on the results of the matches being played today (only a more recent time frame is relevant), many Indians' reluctance to play Pakistan was not due to the aerial conflict, but due to the heinous and knavish murder of our civilians in Pehalgam, nobody is claiming that winning at cricket makes up for the terrorist attacks against us, and so on.
 
Last edited:
No fan of T20 but Babar and Rizwan need to be back. Form is temporary, class is permanent.

Regards
They are not changing the way they play. The only way to change them is to not select them. If they play differently in next psl, they will get selected.
 
we are more than happy to play you at cricket, win or lose,
Of course

It generates a LOT of 💰 for both boards, in case of a bilateral.

Indian cricket is a money machine, everywhere the team travels, those boards be raking it in.. cha-ching ! 🤑

and now, given how things are quite sour between the two mulks, at our lowest point in a decade+ even.. of course India don't want to enrich your board.

Tum bc hum pe ilzaam laga rahe ho ki hum politics kar rahe, hain ji ?

O pai, PCB kaun chalata ? .. might your mighty fauj have their grubby fingers in there too.. ??

PCB and DHA poprtee binnus sem2sem hai, like cotton and sugar and leather every other industry.

Hum Pak fauj ko money gift karein ?

Pori dunya karey tou: wha-wha

Pakistani karey tou
I wonder why :rolleyes:
 
I wonder why :rolleyes:
Yes..., I do wonder 'Why' ?

Sahibzada Farhan is a Pathan. It is part of their culture in Khyber Pakhtoon.

That is how they celebrate - even at Weddings. And its not something new.

What was M.S. Dhoni's excuse? Wanna share that story.
 
Cricket is not played in battlefront nor cricket ground are for gun battles.
Rest, I can't help your manufacturing defect. Decency is not part of all people.
WoW, what a response ...

I asked you for evidence linking the Military to PCB & you gave me this crap 👆 .

Aggression has been part of Cricket for decades now. Perhaps you haven't seen goras verbally abusing Asians or throwing the ball directly at them - intentionally.

But its okay. You're anti-Military & we all know the reason why.
All these bandwagon celebration styles show gimmicky.
Guns are part of the culture in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. So you're now gonna say that they should give their culture. For who..., you, the ICC, the Indians.

Yeah, whatever ...
Real greats, Richards, Imran Khan, Minadad, Hadlee, Marshall never did child play, they prove mettle in their games. Even modern greats ricky, cook, Kain Williams didn't act like that.
Most bizarre is Indian Jadeja.
So basically you just had to bring the great Handsome One in the conversation, right...

Perhaps you should take up Chess.
 
Ind vs Pak is no longer El Classico

It's boring to see these one sided beat downs
Even indian fans are no longer excited

BD vs SL
Pak vs Zim,
South Africa vs Netherlands

These are the real nail biting encounters
 
Cricket is not played in battlefront nor cricket ground are for gun battles.
Rest, I can't help your manufacturing defect. Decency is not part of all people.
Yes. And india/BCCI/GOI started this debacle of regarding a cricket pitch as a forum for declaring hybrid war against Pakistan.

Did SK Yadav not categorically state that the result on the cricket pitch after game 1 was a "response", and that he had acted on instruction from the "government"?

Would you like to see the interview again to refresh your memory that India is the party who adopted this particular line?

Pakistanis should certainly respond aggressively to Indian politicisation of sports. Ideally though, we simply don't play them ever again and receive a bye in any tournament because of the boycott that they have initiated. Happy to respect their political stance as long as they are consistent.
 
I'll agree with you on one point - the Indian team, having made the decision to play Pakistan, should have shaken hands at the end of the game, as is customary. It was unbecoming to not do that.

The rest of your post is full of logical errors and misinferences at every step.

30+ year old records do not have a bearing on the results of the matches being played today (only a more recent time frame is relevant), many Indians' reluctance to play Pakistan was not due to the aerial conflict, but due to the heinous and knavish murder of our civilians in Pehalgam, nobody is claiming that winning at cricket makes up for the terrorist attacks against us, and so on.
Agree, likewise on the one matter that you have agreed on. If the decision to play is taken, then the correct spirit should apply on the pitch and in interviews related to the game.

We shall continue to disagree on many other issues.
 
Abb toh 28 wala match Chahiye Agha ji

Seriouly I don't want again India and pakistan...

already one sided match with pakistan is happening- i guess from last 7 matches, it is now 7-0.

better to play with Srilanka, likely they will give some tough times
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top