imadul
Elite Member
It was simply cheap, and immature.Nothing wrong with celebrating like that.
induans are going to find something in our everything.
We need to stop caring what Indians think about us
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was simply cheap, and immature.Nothing wrong with celebrating like that.
induans are going to find something in our everything.
We need to stop caring what Indians think about us
Pori dunya karey tou: wha-whaIt was simply cheap, and immature.
Cricket is not played in battlefront nor cricket ground are for gun battles.Listen, don't talk rubbish.
If you have any evidence - do share.
But don't go 'bout blowing rainbows out of your rear just 'cause you're anti-Military.
For the record:
accidental CoAS = accidental Handsome Pessimistic PM
All these bandwagon celebration styles show gimmicky.Pori dunya karey tou: wha-wha
Pakistani karey tou 'cheap & imamature'.
I'll agree with you on one point - the Indian team, having made the decision to play Pakistan, should have shaken hands at the end of the game, as is customary. It was unbecoming to not do that.Check overall records if you dare.
Secondly, we are more than happy to play you at cricket, win or lose, but if played, the game must be played correctly, without political overtones and in a gentlemanly manner. This includes handshakes.
It is Indian players who declare that winning at cricket is somehow an "appropriate reply" for the political actions of May, where 7 Indian aircraft were shot down. We Pakistanis don't think cricket is the correct way to reply to aircraft losses, or any other political/military matter.
It is India who declared an intention to boycott and now selectively applies that policy.
It was SKY who himself acknowledged that he was following the instructions of his "government" in his presser after the first match. Would you like me to find the exact quote?
So yes my dear friend from distant gangetic plains - it is entirely correct that the Pakistan cricket team is playing the "hindutva XI", by your own captain's admission.
We can go further of course, and remind you that even notwithstanding SKY's words, the son of a sitting government minister and Modi's right hand man is very literally the head of the ICC. But you know all this already so no need for me to enlighten you.
They are not changing the way they play. The only way to change them is to not select them. If they play differently in next psl, they will get selected.No fan of T20 but Babar and Rizwan need to be back. Form is temporary, class is permanent.
Regards
Of coursewe are more than happy to play you at cricket, win or lose,
I wonder whyPori dunya karey tou: wha-wha
Pakistani karey tou
Yes..., I do wonder 'Why' ?I wonder why![]()
WoW, what a response ...Cricket is not played in battlefront nor cricket ground are for gun battles.
Rest, I can't help your manufacturing defect. Decency is not part of all people.
Guns are part of the culture in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. So you're now gonna say that they should give their culture. For who..., you, the ICC, the Indians.All these bandwagon celebration styles show gimmicky.
So basically you just had to bring the great Handsome One in the conversation, right...Real greats, Richards, Imran Khan, Minadad, Hadlee, Marshall never did child play, they prove mettle in their games. Even modern greats ricky, cook, Kain Williams didn't act like that.
Most bizarre is Indian Jadeja.
Yes. And india/BCCI/GOI started this debacle of regarding a cricket pitch as a forum for declaring hybrid war against Pakistan.Cricket is not played in battlefront nor cricket ground are for gun battles.
Rest, I can't help your manufacturing defect. Decency is not part of all people.
Agree, likewise on the one matter that you have agreed on. If the decision to play is taken, then the correct spirit should apply on the pitch and in interviews related to the game.I'll agree with you on one point - the Indian team, having made the decision to play Pakistan, should have shaken hands at the end of the game, as is customary. It was unbecoming to not do that.
The rest of your post is full of logical errors and misinferences at every step.
30+ year old records do not have a bearing on the results of the matches being played today (only a more recent time frame is relevant), many Indians' reluctance to play Pakistan was not due to the aerial conflict, but due to the heinous and knavish murder of our civilians in Pehalgam, nobody is claiming that winning at cricket makes up for the terrorist attacks against us, and so on.
Abb toh 28 wala match Chahiye Agha ji
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.