Naqvi did not object to India’s refusal to collect Women’s Asia Cup trophy

Again - look at posters such as @El Sidd and others bringing religion into a sports, politics thread and where your country-men have taken the thread. Look where you have managed to take standards of moderation on the forum....

No matter how much people in your country want to impose or defend the 2-nation theory on Indians - the truth will prevail.
The inference that there is some religious undercurrent to Indian state level behaviour is entirely reasonable.

You called your operation "Sindoor", in case you needed reminding.

We have been informed by some sources, including tweets from Modi himself, (though others contradict) that Sindoor has continued on the cricket pitch. The venerable @El Sidd raises a valid point. Refute it with evidence instead of besmirching the good name of the messenger.

If your personal opinion is that religious dogma and cricket have remained separate in India, then you are entitled to that view, but as far as we know, it is contrary to that of the leader of the Indian state and its armed forces.

 
not gloating. Just refuting the allegation from you countryman that Indians didn't shake hands with Naqvi cause he is muslim.
Mixed messages from Indians are unhelpful.

If religious dogma has nothing to do with cricket matches, Modi himself ought to retract his former statements conflating the religious substance of sindoor with a cricket result.

If politics has nothing to do with cricket matches, assurances should be given to Suryakumar Yadav and others that he is there to play cricket and to compete as an athlete, not to be "in agreement with the government" and to continue state policy on the cricket pitch.

images (73).jpeg
 
not gloating. Just refuting the allegation from you countryman that Indians didn't shake hands with Naqvi cause he is muslim.


frankly, you people must be enjoying this childish and immature banter!

this guy is a 'great neuro surgeon', i was told!


try not to laugh!
 
If politics has nothing to do with cricket matches, assurances should be given to Suryakumar Yadav and others that he is there to play cricket and to compete as an athlete, not to be "in agreement with the government" and to continue state policy on the cricket pitch.
Why state policy can't be continued on sports field. Its happening since ages. Its not players' decision, its the people of India who would criticise Modi if sports is treated as if there is some normal bonhomie between two nations.
 
Mixed messages from Indians are unhelpful.

If religious dogma has nothing to do with cricket matches, Modi himself ought to retract his former statements conflating the religious substance of sindoor with a cricket result.

If politics has nothing to do with cricket matches, assurances should be given to Suryakumar Yadav and others that he is there to play cricket and to compete as an athlete, not to be "in agreement with the government" and to continue state policy on the cricket pitch.

View attachment 215600

yadav belongs to OBC (other backward class) in india.
 
Why state policy can't be continued on sports field. Its happening since ages. Its not players' decision, its the people of India who would criticise Modi if sports is treated as if there is some normal bonhomie between two nations.
In peacetime also? Very good if you are sure about this. Make the link if you wish and be consistent instead of this "pick and choose" approach. Simply do not play us at all. It is hypocrisy to play the "enemy" team when your national ideology opposes ours, even in peacetime.

Iran boycotts Israel in sports in the same way. So did USSR and USA previously.

To earn money (and to even let Pakistan earn money) off the spilled sindoor of hindu widows is hypocrisy at its finest.
 
indians despise Islam, hindutva is on record saying this many times. Can you for once be honest? There is no harm in being honest. Why are you so afraid of expressing your true intentions, thoughts and hatred.

Come on Rajesh, not long ago indians were celebrating killing of innocent children in Gaza and Palestine.
Indians do not simply “despise Islam.” What many Indians strongly object to is the particular version of Islam that they have encountered through Pakistan’s politics, communal conflicts, and its state-backed religious identity. For many Indians, Pakistan has been the most visible example of a Muslim-majority state in their immediate geopolitical environment, so it inevitably shapes their perception of Islam.
 
Indians do not simply “despise Islam.” What many Indians strongly object to is the particular version of Islam that they have encountered through Pakistan’s politics, communal conflicts, and its state-backed religious identity. For many Indians, Pakistan has been the most visible example of a Muslim-majority state in their immediate geopolitical environment, so it inevitably shapes their perception of Islam.
We don't give a shitt that you hate us and our particular version of anything. In fact, we love that you hate us. Keep it that way. Be honest about it, instead of pretending otherwise every once in a while just for clicks.

And please go and tell the Indian muslims that you don't hate them. We know not to believe your "certain types of Islam saar!" nonsense because we were fortunate enough to be forewarned. Your countrymen ignored the warnings and now have lived through the razing of Ayodhya, beef lynching, and who even knows what is still to come? You weirdos still curse Tipu Sultan, a son of Karnataka, never mind "particular version of Islam".
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top