Naqvi urges 'all political parties' to settle issue of more provinces, says current 'system' has collapsed

[HAIDER]

tuha yaad ho ya na yaad ho....

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[ACE OF HEARTS]

So the talk about 33-34 economic zones / divisions, is a deflection?

More to do with NFC to get necessary funds for defense, stronger local bodies, karachi becoming separate from Sindh and Whether or not, local bodies will receive funds direct from the federation or indirectly through the provinces.

Disappointed.

 

[Goenitz]

مجھے لگتا ہے یہ سسٹم غدار ، ملک دشمن اور فتنہ الہندوستان کی پراکسی ہے اور بڑا ہی کوئی بے غیرت اور لادین قسم کا سسٹم ہے جو حافظ قرآن ، عالمی پذیرائی والے ، سعودی عرب سے دفاعی معاہدے جیسی سعادت والے فیلڈ مارشل عاصم منیر کے ہوتے ہوئے ناکام ہوگیا ہے۔​

 

[ghazi52]

2002

 

[Distant_Observer]

Can they just get on with this. Enough talking.

Lets have the presidential system and more administrative units.

Declare martial law, Munir to become governer general to usher in this new system.

Politicians are handpicked, no religious nutjobs or dollar hungry corrupts ready to sell their country. No wolfs in sheeps clothing. No ethnofascists. No terrorist sympathizers. No namak harams.

Then we go again with elections and finally course correction.

 

[El Sidd]

You do realise before 1947 British india was a separate legal entity.
Why am i answering fantasy questions from everyone today?
It's like reality can go to hell.

Once you accept history for it's own value, you don't need to ask such Questions.

Mac-Mohan who? Does he effect me?
Durand, I don't see what the confusion is.

There's a difference between a legal entity, and historical fact.

India is a country created in 1947,
Fact.
It was accorded assessor state status, with the objections of Pakistan. Successor state does not mean the same thing,
Fact.
(Loosely speak, this is the nation state version of a "Legal heir status", where a person dies, and the debt and obligations are passed on, but both remain different entities)
The same logic applies to inheritor state status. People here are not understanding the correct context, parroting silly understandings, nitpicking sentences out of context and behaving like children. Clearly i'm not referring to you.

Pardon for the late reply given my speedlimited status.

No one here is denying that India was created out of thin air based on an artificial imposed identity of the 'Indian'. Apart from this artificial identity which literally translates as not-PakistanI, there's nothing nation about India.

But this newly created artificial state of India inherited all legal and political baggage of British India. It is infrastructurally same as British India, a colonial entity.