FOOLS_NIGHTMARE
Elite Member
- Sep 25, 2018
- 23,881
- 39,275
- Country of Origin
- Country of Residence
A blast from a not-so-distant past.
Whatever delays or issues you foresee with Indian reliance on American engine, Pakistan will have similar issues (if not same) with importing entire planes from other countries. Add to that the financial issues Pakistan is facing, and LCA ip rights are entirely ours, I would say India is more comfortably placed vis a vis j10 and jf17 (not talking about capabilities, just forthcoming production and induction plans).
While i like to believe this and make me feel good but Pl15E is just not superior to Meteor or AIM-120D or AIM-260. infect its max range is smaller than either of those missiles unless PAF gets PL15 [without the E]PAF J-10CP with "First See - First Shoot Capability" negated any advantage with Rafale inductions across the border.Next 2 - 3 years formal J-31 induction would be matchless in the region.
View attachment 48360
Never know until its tested in combat.. as to both what it can do and what the PAF has sitting in its storage.While i like to believe this and make me feel good but Pl15E is just not superior to Meteor or AIM-120D or AIM-260. infect its max range is smaller than either of those missiles unless PAF gets PL15 [without the E]
Yes hope it never happens but I still think paf should ask for pl15 without e and show it off as deference . Might as well go for even longer range options if available. By the way do we know what is nez of pl15,?Never know until its tested in combat.. as to both what it can do and what the PAF has sitting in its storage.
Hopefully that never happens
Yes hope it never happens but I still think paf should ask for pl15 without e and show it off as deference . Might as well go for even longer range options if available. By the way do we know what is nez of pl15,?
If that is the case then aim 120c5 and sd10a of PAF should still pose a significant threat to Indian Rafael is this a fair assessment?