PAF J-10CE News, Updates and Discussion

[Ak01]

Brother i am no indian and i ask from senior members because i believe they wont gave secret information. For your information below is my google scholar profile and you can check and verify. Also, i am a patriot and love my pakistan beyond anything

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=cw_8cy8AAAAJ&hl=en

i wouldnt worry, log thoray jazbaati ho jatay hain. Plus, sometimes throwing about big words makes stuff sound more serious than it is lol

 

[Tariq Habib Afridi]

tbh im not super familiar on Chinese SAM's, but generally when it comes to VHF radars, you can detect an inbound VLO asset, but the resolution would be very coarse. Their longer wavelength gives them an easier time in detection, but at the cost of tracking accuracy and resolution. In practice, its more of an early warning tool, used to cue other sensors and or effectors.

With the longer wavelength, you have a far broader beam, like just a silly example but a 3m antenna at 100mhz may have a beam width of 8 degrees, vs an X band aperture would have a sub 1 degree beam width- just an example.

You also cant have full broadband stealth right, youll likely make tradeoffs against VHF band by improving X and S band stealth characteristics as most fire control radars will operat ein these bands. So JY27 etc all exploit this, giving u detection at reasonable ranges, however, those large beam widths cant give u the 'tight' lock llike an x band or s band radar can, meaning you can have multiple hundred meter inaccuracies, really dropping ur pK down hard.

But it can point the fighter aircraft especially if we have J-35 in that direction atleast? Lets not discuss the detail but can with combination of VHF radar and fifth gen fighter we can engage any enemy stealth fighter aircraft?

 

[Tariq Habib Afridi]

i wouldnt worry, log thoray jazbaati ho jatay hain. Plus, sometimes throwing about big words makes stuff sound more serious than it is lol

By the way mujhay b ye sab information koyi secret nahi lagii and most probably existing system bilkul different ho pakistan ka.. all we discussed is general information link 16 and link 16 based links related information

 

[Ak01]

But it can point the fighter aircraft especially if we have J-35 in that direction atleast? Lets not discuss the detail but can with combination of VHF radar and fifth gen fighter we can engage any enemy fighter aircraft?

So now if you use something like the JY27 to guide the j-35, it just comes down to whos got the more powerful radar and more powerful seekers on their missiles to be able to detect the other first tbh

 

[Tariq Habib Afridi]

So now if you use something like the JY27 to guide the j-35, it just comes down to whos got the more powerful radar and more powerful seekers on their missiles to be able to detect the other first tbh

It means we will have advantage over here with out J-35? atleast hum bomber tau easily gira sakaingay like B-2 aur unka future B-21 raider?

 

[Ak01]

It means we will have advantage over here with out J-35? atleast hum bomber tau easily gira sakaingay like B-2 aur unka future B-21 raider?

Nobody will have the answer to this, but these sorts of engagements are far from easy tbh. We dont know the capabilites of either so no clue

 

[Tariq Habib Afridi]

Nobody will have the answer to this, but these sorts of engagements are far from easy tbh. We dont know the capabilites of either so no clue

yes VHF kay saath ye aik issue hoga like distinguishing F-22 from decoys due to low resolution in VHF/UHF bands. I think china has been working on "GaN-on-Diamond" we should also send our top scientist to work with them on the same. that will really boost our fighter radars range and may also help in locating, identifying and guiding stealth fighters. Meanwhile we should also work on Ga₂O₃ T/R Modules as US DARPA is also working on it.

 

[Tariq Habib Afridi]

Hi,

I doubt that is your agenda---otherwise you would have kept your mouth shut.

Assalam U Alaikum,

Okay i wont talk much and wont ask much questions. i will be as i was from 2019 as a silent reader. but one think i will always do which is finding new research in every defence related issues and here i will suggest those if incase someone listen and adopt that direction to improve our defence.

 

[Ak01]

Assalam U Alaikum,

Okay i wont talk much and wont ask much questions. i will be as i was from 2019 as a silent reader. but one think i will always do which is finding new research in every defence related issues and here i will suggest those if incase someone listen and adopt that direction to improve our defence.

feel free to ask questions. Ask to your hearts content. Ignore these types.

 

[Tariq Habib Afridi]

feel free to ask questions. Ask to your hearts content. Ignore these types.

Sure, i will now ask generic question. this way i will learn and no one will have any issue related to leaking any confidential knowledge.

 

[Tariq Habib Afridi]

dua karo kohi iss budhay ka internet access band krde

na Allah inko salamat rakhay.. inka JH-7 wala josh aur ye offensive thinking i too like. and i believe one can learn something from anyone.

 

[MastanKhan]

dua karo kohi iss budhay ka internet access band krde

@Musings @Waz

Please control your puppy---.

 

[Oscar]

Can we please have folks stop being “thekedars”

Discussion is fine and there is no harm in asking questions. If there is something that could be classified and not common sense for those with actual degrees in communications engineering it will be deleted.

Just as there is no need to insult people

 

[Ak01]

Can we please have folks stop being “thekedars”

Discussion is fine and there is no harm in asking questions. If there is something that could be classified and not common sense for those with actual degrees in communications engineering it will be deleted.

Just as there is no need to insult people

saar khlassified

 

[Oscar]

saar khlassified

This is not an OPSEC breach because it is technical speculation based on open standards and publicly known system limitations. An OPSEC breach would involve confirming classified capabilities, system configurations, or deployment details that are not publicly acknowledged.

At the end of the day - how sure are any of us that it was truly link-17 that day?