PAF J-10CE News, Updates and Discussion

[FuturePAF]

Ballistic missiles on J10C? You mean Kinzal type aero- Ballistic missile?

The CM-400AKG is basically a ballistic missile. Something slightly larger (longer actually), with a second stage made up of a hypersonic glider maybe more sustainable against even the most modern of threats. A longer range missile would allow the J-10 to launch from a safer distance as well as from an expected angle; such as flying low to Yemen and turning around to attack from the south. The J-10’s longer range (over the JF-17) makes such a prospect more possible.

 

[Ali Yusuf]

IMO, the real challenge would be the comparative effectiveness of the main BVR missiles of the two platforms in question.

I think despite the range advantage Captor-E may have over the AESA radar of the J-10C, PL-15 still might offer, the Dragon, the first shoot capability.

As far as the HOBS capability of the WVRAAM's of the two platforms is concerned, I am eagerly waiting for some feedback.

 

[Ali Yusuf]

IMO, the real challenge would be the comparative effectiveness of the main BVR missiles of the two platforms in question.

After posting the above, the question that arises is how accurate the simulated data (for the exercise) about the performance of these missiles is (actually?).

 

[Be dazzled]

J10c has a very capable Aesa and ecm set. That thing is a beast per someone who knows more. Both are derivatives of j20s tech. No wonder it made an impression of air forces the world over including paf

 

[ghazi52]

 

[Reichmarshal]

I believe the Air Chief is already on his way out, unless, he too is getting an extension .

On a another matter...
I gotta say, seeing the EFT & J-10 side-by-side - it's shocking how the two look similar in size & design.

Although, I do need to look up as to how much the J-10 can carry on its hard points, 'cause the EFT is Bomb Truck.

View attachment 10043​

He's making the rounds to get an extension

 

[Deino]

They might not be meant for it, but could be employed in that role. Their ability to carry potentially larger Anti-Ship Cruise missiles or Ballistic missiles, might make them better suited, then any other aircraft in the PAF inventory, should push come to shove.

The first is a photoshopped picture, but something like this. The YJ-12 is one option.


View attachment 10842
View attachment 10844

Pakistan to Develop a Supersonic Missile for Naval Usage - Quwa

According to the Pakistan Ministry of Defence Production’s disclosure for 2017-2018, the Directorate General of Munitions Production (DGMP) signed-off on the local development of a supersonic missile for the Pakistan Navy.

quwa.org

CM-302 anti-ship cruise missile: China’s BrahMos Competitor? - Quwa

At Air Show China, which took place in Zhuhai last week, China Aerospace Science & Industry Corporation (CASC) had marketed a new supersonic…

quwa.org

The PAF may need this platform, down the line, perhaps with a more power engine to be able to carry a pair of Hypersonic cruise missiles with enough range to effectively keep Indian carrier battle groups at bay.

https://mwi.westpoint.edu/mwi-podcast-breaking-down-the-hypersonic-missile-threat/

Come on, the YJ-12 is a monster of a missile much too large and heavy! The J-10 can never ever carry this one ... the missile in the images is a YJ-91 ARM.

 

[LeGenD]

they look beautiful

but recently I only see things through the eyes of the Palestinian conflict

I am sure if called the PAF J10 would wipe the floor with the Israelis and the clear the skies over Gaza

This is not our fight. And No! WE cannot do that. There is a reason why no country wants to challenge Israel in conventional terms. Israel has installed very capable defenses against jet fighters, drones, and ballistic missiles and they also have a fleet of F-35 jets which will wipe the floor with any jet in our arsenal. One must have realistic expectations.

Pakistan should focus on its own issues.

 

[Dreamer]

This is not our fight. And No! WE cannot do that. There is a reason why no country wants to challenge Israel in conventional terms. Israel has installed very capable defenses against jet fighters, drones, and ballistic missiles and they also have a fleet of F-35 jets which will wipe the floor with any jet in our arsenal. One must have realistic expectations.

Pakistan should focus on its own issues.

I could respond to every point in this post but I am not going to because it's not the topic here. Sorry but this post can only derail this thread. Even as a retired moderator you should know better.

 

[LeGenD]

I could reply to this post but I am not going to because it's not the topic here. Sorry but you as a retired moderator are derailing this thread. Even retired you should know better.

I responded to a post. Not your problem.

 

[Dreamer]

I responded to a post. Not your problem.

Some posts should be ignored.

 

[Aziqbal]

This is not our fight. And No! WE cannot do that. There is a reason why no country wants to challenge Israel in conventional terms. Israel has installed very capable defenses against jet fighters, drones, and ballistic missiles and they also have a fleet of F-35 jets which will wipe the floor with any jet in our arsenal. One must have realistic expectations.

Pakistan should focus on its own issues.

Good to see you here LeGenD

 

[Yommie]

with f35, these j10c will struggle

J-10C has better agility and speed compared to F-35.

 

[NGAD IS THE BEST]

J-10C has better agility and speed compared to F-35.

But F35 is a stealth jet you can't evade incoming aam only with agility and maneuverability

 

[FOOLS_NIGHTMARE]

J10CE has given the Pakistan Air Force a first look and first shoot capability.

USA has misused its influence to restrain various Muslim air forces from obtaining high-tech capabilities and long-range missiles, while J-10C enables PAF to assert its dominance in the region.