PAF J-10CE News Updates and Discussions part ll

Generally in exercises, there are canned setups and strict pre-briefed ROE. The PL-15 has a longer range so this result is possible, but I won't read much into it.

Pakistan has very recently downed advanced Rafale fighter jets in a real-life combat scenario. Given this operational track record, the J-10C can certainly hold its own against Eurofighter Typhoons. In a one on one engagement, the J-10C is fully capable of matching high-end 4th and 4.5 generation Western fighters.

Furthermore, the PAF has significantly enhanced its operational doctrine by integrating sophisticated network centric warfare capabilities.

Chinese fighters now exceed European fighter capabilities.
 
Last edited:
I never had 2 accounts ever here on PDF or on old PDF, Ask @Deino that how reliable SCMP is on Chinese military matters

And last give me third party (Neutral) sources (other than Chinese sources) that J-10C scored 9-0 against EF-2000, look dude J-10 is their product so may be they are hyping to their product to increase their export
Well, although how reliable SCMP is is arguable, the point as many said, is that SCMP like many other western media outlets (I.e.: military watch) simply cites their information source from China official CCTV, which reports the fact (9:0) happened almost 2 years ago. Chinese official media like Xinhua or CCTV usually are conservative. The facts that CCTV reports J10CP down IAF rafales only 1 year later & J10CP scores 9:0 against EF2000 only 2 years later shows CCTV does not want to be eye catching, and they are serious to report a fact.

Thus, you can question SCMP reliability on its reporting based on SCMP own source, but no doubt SCMP will not purposely translate a CCTV news report in Chinese to English falsely to just exaggerate the content.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TAC
That is the nature of millatary news, you can never be sure, but you can only sense check it, and this particular case it makes perfect sense if you connect the dots. Here are the dots:
1. 2014: European Common Radar System tech demonstrator debuted but not funded.
2. 2016: Flew for the first time amid funding being made available via the Kuwait deal.
3. 2017: Further development subsidised by the Qatar deal.
4. 2021-2022: IOC on mk-0 as first deliveries began to Kuwait and Qatar.
5. 2022: modern Chinese AESA exported for the first time.
6. 2024: Alleged engagements in BVR regime take place during Zilzal.
7. 2025: Qatar ofloads Typhoons in second hand deal with Turkey.
8. All this time in Europe: Spain and Germany hold-off for more advance GaN based mk-1, UK never orders mk-0 and holds off waiting for mk-2.

Conclusion: Somewhere in the last 2 or 3 years it became abduntantly clear to the world (not just the US), how far ahead Chinese tech was and they took observable steps to say the same.
Hi,

I believe that chinese have leaped ahead in certain technologies that the west might have a very difficult time catching up---.

I firmly believe that they have crossed the threshold that was holding them back---.

There is no euphoria like the smell of victory of their product since may---9/10th---.

The smell of victory accelerates success in manners not seen otherwise---.
 
And last give me third party (Neutral) sources (other than Chinese sources) that J-10C scored 9-0 against EF-2000, look dude J-10 is their product so may be they are hyping to their product to increase their exports, and its similar to IAF's MKIs/RAF's Typhoons exercises back in 2010 (as far as can I remember) when Russian and Indian media claimed that MKI eats Typhoon without using BARs PEASA radars but British media denied such claims by Russia/India


J 10c, defeated french made jet Rafael sold to india. Rafael is considered by everyone as the best 4.5 Gen jet on the current market has stealth features built on to it . On the paper it is better than Typhoon by many western experts. So why you have doubts J10C capabilities to counter EuroFighter during the Qatari exercise called “ GHIZAR -11 was a multinational joint air exercise.
 
he is a kid, let him be.
I doubt he is some kind of "kid" - just look at his posts and reputation.

He keeps asking the same repeated questions from old posts until now and he never seems to learn anything at all.

Even when you explain things fully like every users above, he dismisses it and mock you. He’s always negative and rude, you rarely see him say anything positive about anything.
 
You’ve got something wrong with your head. If someone has stated a conclusion and provided a source, and you doubt it, then you need to bring out your own data or sources to refute their conclusion—not just say “I doubt it” or “I don’t believe it” and expect others to prove it to you again and again.

Who do you think you are?you are nothing but rubbish for the others.

Believe it or not, that’s up to you. But before you can produce a conclusion, data, or evidence,don’t spout bullshit.
you guys (Chinese source) claiming not me, its burden upon you guys to prove otherwise I don't buy this crap
 
Why should I ask Deino? I respect him but that doesn't mean I am going to take his opinion. Was he present at the exercise?
And think again,.... Are you sure you didn't have another ID on PDF? What if I bring the proof?
Because he is deep insider on Chinese military news and he wrote a book on Chinese military aviation, he knows better than most of us that how reliable SCMP is and do please provide a prove my another ID here on PDF
 
Because he is deep insider on Chinese military news and he wrote a book on Chinese military aviation, he knows better than most of us that how reliable SCMP is and do please provide a prove my another ID here on PDF
Your forehead is bleeding now, BTW.
Just stop annoying respectable members here with your childish and rude behavior.
DO NOT derail thread with your fights with everyone.
 
Alright.
If the moderators permit, I’ll join in the fun. However, I still strongly urge the moderators to step in immediately and put a stop to this pointless bickering!

===========================================

If these fighter jets were placed in a completely isolated environment—operating entirely without any system-level support:
Rafale > J-10CE > J-10C

If these fighter jets were compared within an optimal support environment:
Rafale < J-10CE < J-10C

The fundamental logic of modern military weapon design precludes any modern weapon from operating entirely in isolation from its support systems. These support systems serve simultaneously as force multipliers for the weapon platforms themselves and as constraints upon their capabilities.

Therefore, the act of evaluating a weapon platform in isolation—detached from its support system—is, in reality, quite foolish.
 
Last edited:
J 10c, defeated french made jet Rafael sold to india. Rafael is considered by everyone as the best 4.5 Gen jet on the current market has stealth features built on to it . On the paper it is better than Typhoon by many western experts. So why you have doubts J10C capabilities to counter EuroFighter during the Qatari exercise called “ GHIZAR -11 was a multinational joint air exercise.
many not all, and Rafale is basically stand-off striker and CAS jet with secondary air superiority capability, its T/W, lift to drag ratios (with air to air payload) is lower than that of Typhoon and its also has lower kinematic performance compare to Typhoon, So Typhoon is more intended for air superiority mission than Rafale, you has to remember Typhoon is inspired by F-15 specification which is best air superiority jet in the world
 
Your forehead is bleeding now, BTW.
Just stop annoying respectable members here with your childish and rude behavior.
DO NOT derail thread with your fights with everyone.
you guys have no logic and common sense and living in your utopia and fairytales, I'm living in reality and facts, may be you guys have blind patriotism that block the facts and realities lol
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top