MastanKhan
VIP Member
Hi,To be honest, when I see KAAN, I just think of it as a poor man's F-35.
It is like the AK47---It takes a licking and keeps on ticking.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hi,To be honest, when I see KAAN, I just think of it as a poor man's F-35.
Just because nytimes said it, it is more likely to be false. Besides, why would people ignore the big "E" in CPEC?One of the supposed parts of CPEC was to set up a production line in Pakistan that would manufacture a next-gen fighter for the PAF and other markets.
![]()
China’s ‘Belt and Road’ Plan in Pakistan Takes a Military Turn (Published 2018)
Under a program China insisted was peaceful, Pakistan is cooperating on distinctly defense-related projects, including a secret plan to build new fighter jets.www.nytimes.com
Ultimately, I think we'll see a situation where a fighter production line will be set up within Pakistan, but away from the hands of PAC (and, by extension, the PAF leadership). There's a 'bigger shark' in all this and that's the Army leadership, which is basically the guarantor for NESCOM, SUPARCO, and HIT.
Not the ideal scenario (see the results in HIT and SUPARCO), but okay, it may be better than leaving anything with PAC.
With NESCOM rolling out more products, I can see a scenario where NESCOM becomes the principal manufacturer of a next-gen fighter and UCAV via a new subdivision.
Because we have 70+ years of experience living under an Army who manages most of the "E" in Pakistan.Just because nytimes said it, it is more likely to be false. Besides, why would people ignore the big "E" in CPEC?
i think you should read the post again, and again, and again, and again, and again until you get what its saying.Just because nytimes said it, it is more likely to be false. Besides, why would people ignore the big "E" in CPEC?
Why would Pakistan and other export customers settle for the inferior WS-21 when the WS19 is available?
When the J-35A(landbased variant) adopted a new body structure design, the wings and fuselage were integrated and inseparable.How can you transport this kind of extra wide cargo with a transport plane?One of the supposed parts of CPEC was to set up a production line in Pakistan that would manufacture a next-gen fighter for the PAF and other markets.
![]()
China’s ‘Belt and Road’ Plan in Pakistan Takes a Military Turn (Published 2018)
Under a program China insisted was peaceful, Pakistan is cooperating on distinctly defense-related projects, including a secret plan to build new fighter jets.www.nytimes.com
Ultimately, I think we'll see a situation where a fighter production line will be set up within Pakistan, but away from the hands of PAC (and, by extension, the PAF leadership). There's a 'bigger shark' in all this and that's the Army leadership, which is basically the guarantor for NESCOM, SUPARCO, and HIT.
Not the ideal scenario (see the results in HIT and SUPARCO), but okay, it may be better than leaving anything with PAC.
With NESCOM rolling out more products, I can see a scenario where NESCOM becomes the principal manufacturer of a next-gen fighter and UCAV via a new subdivision.

Hi,Since it is NOT available for any export customer !
Please don't force people to read anything from NY Times. That is not nice.i think you should read the post again, and again, and again, and again, and again until you get what its saying.
Sir, easy with the nonsense. The last sentence is of no need.Hi,
In english it is means that " it is not available till it becomes available and by that time you really don't see the need for it---".
Secondly---Paf chose the P&W a less powerful engine over the GE---.
So---your post is intended as another insult to pakistan and Paf---.
also the USAF was operating the PW too, so it was a kind of assured support/supply too.Sir, easy with the nonsense. The last sentence is of no need.
PAF settled for F-16A/Bs which was only powered by PW at the time. They picked the Block 52+ variant years later and that too for engine commonality regarding maintenance workshops, Sargodha was their only hub for that and they had trouble setting up shop for regular hauls to Kamra due to the squadron ops.
By that logic....your post was also an insult to Pakistan and the very PAF I grew up in.....
Explain---use your logic and not mine.Sir, easy with the nonsense. The last sentence is of no need.
PAF settled for F-16A/Bs which was only powered by PW at the time. They picked the Block 52+ variant years later and that too for engine commonality regarding maintenance workshops, Sargodha was their only hub for that and they had trouble setting up shop for regular hauls to Kamra due to the squadron ops.
By that logic....your post was also an insult to Pakistan and the very PAF I grew up in.....
Why not go for ge f110 once for all in 2006Sir, easy with the nonsense. The last sentence is of no need.
PAF settled for F-16A/Bs which was only powered by PW at the time. They picked the Block 52+ variant years later and that too for engine commonality regarding maintenance workshops, Sargodha was their only hub for that and they had trouble setting up shop for regular hauls to Kamra due to the squadron ops.
By that logic....your post was also an insult to Pakistan and the very PAF I grew up in.....
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.