Pakistan-Af: Operation Khyber Storm
- Thread starter side-winder
- Start date
- Status
Irfan Baloch
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
read my posts about our retaliation in Afghanistan and view about deporting Afghans then you might need to edit your post. there is no hate towards PTI just criticsm on the way it conducts itself on social media. re Afghanistan I draw distincition between its people and the regime.
Liquidator
Trusted Member
Baibers_1260
Trusted Member
The Pakistan Afghan border has 5 checkpoints. There are very few roads to transport bulk goods such as food and duel. The rest of the border consists of "donkey" trails on mountain passes that cannot be used by vehicles. "Donkey back" smuggling of goods has always been present even with the checkpoints open and will continue regardless of what happens elsewhere. However "donkey back" smuggling is insufficient to sustain a poverty stricken landlocked nation entirely dependent on imports from a single country to the east.
This is exactly the dilemma Nepal faces with India. By shutting down just 5 checkpoints India has regularly forced Nepal onto its knees literally begging for the borders to be opened.
Didn't India successfully close the border with Bangladesh after the change of government in Bangladesh? The India-Bangladesh border is approximately 4096 km. Yet it is mostly controlled. However unlike Afghanistan and Nepal Bangladesh has an access to the sea and a couple of good ports . So the Indian closure is not that effective, Additionally the closure of the India Bangladesh border hurts Infia much more because it also closes off land, water and air transit access to India's north eastern states leaving only the Siliguri corridor "chicken's neck" as a point of access.
SABRE
Registered Member
After Hannibal defeated ~80,000 strong Roman army at the Battle of Canae, one of his officers and personal friend suggested marching to Rome. Hannibal rejected the proposal, leading the officer/friend to state something along the lines of "You know how to achieve victory, Hannibal, but you don't know what to with it."
That said, sometimes peace treaties appear disadvantageous but they prove to be beneficial in the long run. Example: the Peace of Hudebya. There is no chance that Taliban would keep their end of the bargain, simply because they cannot. Fighting/militancy is their economy. When Pakistani support ended they turned to the one willing to fund them - India. When they break the peace is when they reveal their true self. That's the time when you strike them. In the meantime, Pakistan needs to strengthen itself. Systematically take action against the miscreants on this side of the border so they won't be nuisance when the military action restarts.
RescueRanger
Meme Lord
PECA is very clear on the threshold. Remember the tale of the camel and the tent.
Some boundaries must be maintained.
Tariq Habib Afridi
Registered Member
That is what the new CM with core commander kpk should investigate and find out
We have a banking system based on Interest. In Islamic mode of partnership, the one who invests the money also takes the risk in case of a loss. In Jewish Banking, in case of loss, the bank takes no loss and instead takes the borrower's land or other collateral.
Quaid's whole Pakistan movement was based on the slogan of La Ilaha Illal Lah. If not real, then the government must declare that it just was a political slogan and had nothing to do with the actual aims of the Pakistan movement.
Islam has its own social system based on family values which has survived to this day and is being eroded due to western influence and media.
Islam has its own judicial laws which are completely different from the amended Government of India Act that we have applied in Pakistan.
Islam has its own concept of Ummah which does not believe in borders between Muslims. It can be best implemented by having a European Union and NATO type of Union between the Muslim countries so that we become a power and can face challenges like Palestine jointly.
Taimoor
Elite Member
These are the questions, those who have loyalty to GHQ (not Pakistan) will never answer with straight face. The idea of submitting to the will of the citizens is alien to them.
RescueRanger
Meme Lord
You will reap what you sow.
Bilal
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
You will reap what you sow.
We don’t host NRF. But we don’t consider NRF terrorists. They have legitimate concerns that Taliban regime should address through talks.
El Sidd
Elite Member
Not looking for rhetoric but asked for specifics in the constitution. Yes, interest based economic system is not ideologically aligned with the state religion and framework has been deliberated to avoid it altogether. It's a continuous ideological struggle to an evolving construct I.e. socio-economics.
Pakistan provides preferential treatment to Muslim majority countries without harboring desires of exploitation or anything detrimental to their sovereignty. This is documented history which is witness to any communal obligation towards a wider concept of supernation or Ummatul Muslimeen.
As far as some Dhul Qarnayn federation is concerned, it already exists in shared delusions carried by those who indulge in idealism and romanticism.
It is not a delusion. It was a historical fact from he times of the Companions of the Prophet (PBUH) to 1924.
hasssanali8998
Elite Member
You will reap what you sow.
we should definitely support them , lets see how they like it when bombings happen to their forces
Hakikat ve Hikmet
VIP Member
50 shades of grey....
- Status
