mythbuster
Trusted Member
Sattlelight imagery doesn't work well on missiles in flightThe Babus are still living in Unnis so deyrh. Those "Reasons" are long gone. Those who need to know, already know. They got satellite imagery
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sattlelight imagery doesn't work well on missiles in flightThe Babus are still living in Unnis so deyrh. Those "Reasons" are long gone. Those who need to know, already know. They got satellite imagery
No way it costs millions of dollars, we are making engines and it's sensors in pak for this, expensive and hard to get modules like DMSAC and TERCOM have not been utilized for this missile.You wanna waste a missile that cost millions of dollars on Taliban? bruhhhhhh
No way it costs millions of dollars, we are making engines and it's sensors in pak for this, expensive and hard to get modules like DMSAC and TERCOM have not been utilized for this missile.
Max $200-$300k missile, could be even more cheaper if we are really mass producing it, mind you this will be your long range work horse, we'll be spamming this missile like crazy, our BMs will be cautionary, if the indians fire those than you'll see F5 being used.
It's rebranded Babur-1B ER with tweaks to get it to 1000-1100 KM.
Babur-1B ER was tested 5 years ago. At that time, range quoted was 800-900 KM.
Enhanced version of cruise missile tested successfully
The Newspaper's Staff Reporter Published December 22, 2021
Wasn't the whole point for the Fatah series to be expendable cheaper missiles to use in massive waves and to have a conventional strike package?
It can not be that expensive else it kind of loses its intended purpose.
No way it costs millions of dollars, we are making engines and it's sensors in pak for this, expensive and hard to get modules like DMSAC and TERCOM have not been utilized for this missile.
Max $200-$300k missile, could be even more cheaper if we are really mass producing it, mind you this will be your long range work horse, we'll be spamming this missile like crazy, our BMs will be cautionary, if the indians fire those than you'll see F5 being used.
You wanna waste a missile that cost millions of dollars on Taliban? bruhhhhhh
Range is never shared (also because it is always variable depending on the weight of the minimum viable payload). Always estimated by observers. Best to keep such things under wraps.Quite strange that they haven’t shared the new range. Probably crossed the 1000km range for once. Perhaps around 1200km.
Here’s an AI enhanced version of the launch picture.
Isn't that Fatah 3 and its future variants?This is great but I'm more interested in our supersonic/hypersonic option
Drones for that. Still that domain sucks in Pakiustan Army.You wanna waste a missile that cost millions of dollars on Taliban? bruhhhhhh
In your opinion, what are the reasons that have kept our cruise missile technology stagnant (range vise) at 900-1000 km ?
No way it costs millions of dollars, we are making engines and it's sensors in pak for this, expensive and hard to get modules like DMSAC and TERCOM have not been utilized for this missile.
Max $200-$300k missile, could be even more cheaper if we are really mass producing it, mind you this will be your long range work horse, we'll be spamming this missile like crazy, our BMs will be cautionary, if the indians fire those than you'll see F5 being used.
its funny how Pakistan sucks when it comes to innovations and making something of own.Limited pocket as compare to Iranians. Frequent US sanctions on our front end companies running black market purchases. China not as generous sharing engine tech. Limited supply and procurement of turbojets from Ukraine Pakistan homegrown solution took a long time develop and mature hence we seeing Coventional line of Ra'ad and Babur in form of Fatah-IV and Taimoor. But the homegrown engine is still inefficient. Hence the range not going over 1500 KM yet.