Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
SoulSpokesman said:
@Mighty_Dragon_Strike

no, mate, IWT suspension has not happened, for no ordinary reason..

Means nothing. It will take us a decade to build dams to divert waters, if we start today. It is noora kushti.

Regards
Click to expand...
not canals, you have made IWT suspension, a issue now!

we are at the receiving end, for no reason, it is just a smoke screen!
 
veeru said:
If we don't see any big terror attack in Kashmir in next foreseeable future and I believe that would be a case. Then op Sindoor would be considered as success for India.
Click to expand...

You guys are totally deluded that there won't be any terrorist attacks in Kashmir. It is not even remotely in Pakistan or India hands what happens there. There are too many in Kashmir who would do things on their own.
 
Have you all believed in the New World Order Conspiracy theory

They dismiss it as a conspiracy, but now it seems likely that these engineered conflicts are the works of BIllionaire Oligarchs, Politicians, Jews(Zionist Ones)

Really feels like in a century or so the world will have a totalitarian govt and that idea scares the hell out of me
 
Vkdindian1 said:
In fact, Paksiatn should have made an aggressive effort to call for a ceasefire on 7th May. It should have made this intent known across the world. This would have left India with a red face of loosing fighters and not been able to do any more damage.
Click to expand...

Pakistan WANTED a ceasefire after May 7 as Pakistan was ahead on May 7 after downing Indian jets AND killing Indian soldiers across the LOC. It is India which wanted to avenge for May 7 and kept sending drones into Pakistan.
But Pakistan couldn't publicly say that because the narrative would become 'Oh, so you are trading lives of 30+ Pakistani civilians for some Indian jets'. That was a hard sell and if you look into the posts between May 7 and May 10 in the first version of this thread on PDF then you'd see that most Pakistanis wanted to 'punish' India; there were very few exceptions to that narrative including me.
 
Meengla said:
Pakistan WANTED a ceasefire after May 7 as Pakistan was ahead on May 7 after downing Indian jets AND killing Indian soldiers across the LOC. It is India which wanted to avenge for May 7 and kept sending drones into Pakistan.
But Pakistan couldn't publicly say that because the narrative would become 'Oh, so you are trading lives of 30+ Pakistani civilians for some Indian jets'. That was a hard sell and if you look into the posts between May 7 and May 10 in the first version of this thread on PDF then you'd see that most Pakistanis wanted to 'punish' India; there were very few exceptions to that narrative including me.
Click to expand...
What we should have done is started retaliating immediately. When they sent drones we shouldve struck their bases. That wouldve been a better way to handle this
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 1 more.
    • Total: 19 (members: 4, guests: 15)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top