Just to clarify on Ayodhya:
Neither the Archeological Survey of India in its excavation report, nor the Supreme Court in its decision mentioned any Hindu or Sanatani temple on the disputed site, Excavations revealed no idol fragments or carvings normally associated with temple demolitions. The temple site is not mentioned in any of the writings by medieval Hindu seers or writers most important of all Tulsi Das himself who translated the Ramayana. The excavations revealed faint traces of some sort of pre-existing structure possibly Jain or Buddhist which deteriorated into ruins and collapse dated ot an era much before the arrival of Babar
The Ramayana is a poem written by Valmiki and the original Vedas written thousands of years before the Ramayana make no mention of Lord Ram or even his earlier incarnation of Vishnu,
Ayodhya was settled by the Supreme Court on the issue of public belief and sentiments, not on legal jurisprudence.
The compensation of "land for a mosque " given to Muslims is irrelevant because the Muslims never asked for a compensation. As such the mosque has not been built because the district administration has rejected all architectural plans submitted and there is little likelihood of that ever happening.
Babri Masjid was not the only mosque demolished. Thousands of new mosques have been demolished all over the country either through so-called communal riots or bulldozed by the government as "punishment ".