Why a "non-specific, no response " when he could have given accurate news about Indian victories? In 2019 the IAF gave a very "specific response" on the downing of an F-16 Block 52 D, piloted by a certain Fl.Lt. Shazazuddin. So it was that specific, type, model, and name of the pilot. What's different this time.
The interview was on 11th. The reason which he gave on being non specific is that it is still an operational detail. Either they do not have enough information about what was hit or downed OR
likely nothing was downed and perhaps only attempted by IAF.
Why so? Because likely IAF were not even preparing for an air to air warfare. I have said it before too. IAF platforms involved, specficially lack of AEW&C and electronic war fare platforms, suggests they never expected an air to air warfare.
So they suffered losses in air to air combat while completing their mission : destroying multiple seminaries all over Pakistan.
"Any god damn jet fighter can be said as ",hi tech". Agree with you there.. "any god damn jet fighter " such as the Mig 21 "Bison" or the De Havilland Vampire.
Absolutely! When they use non specific termininology, it means exactly this. Any god damned jet fighter plane. This is why I called it a non-response.
Would you classify your Doordarshan as privately owned ?
What time stamp? I cannot watch the entire 1 hr+ of that video.
Is AVM Bharti living in a real world?
Ask him directly if you can.
My opinion is that mostly he is.
Most of Indian claims have been backed by evidence and battle damage assessment. Both on 7th May and 10th May.
Compared to that Pakistan has made some really wild claims with absolutely no proof.
S-400? ZERO proof of damage.
Indian missile on Afghanistan? ZERO proof.
India attacked Amritsar with ballistic missiles? ZERO proof.
Which side is living in real world? I do not think it is hard to find.
Define significant damage and what exactly was hit
Show damage like below at Engels Air Base
Why so? Why exactly a video like that? Why that standard?
You didnt ask that for S-400 pakistani claim.
You didnt ask that for pakistani claim that Indian missiles landed in Afghanistan.
You didnt ask that for pakistani claim that India used ballistic missiles to target Amritsar
Apparently, for International media, the satellite images they obtained were good enough and convincing Pakistan was never a target for India.