Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

Because it is easy to hide these damages. We actually only targeted your Cheeseboard Radar and not the whole system. Thats why modi was able to go to adampur and show off the S-400 but thats really not anything if you dont show the radar itself
most Pakistanis fail to understand about how India functions. Hiding such losses is a serious crime in India, and no government, at any point in history, has even tried to conceal wartime losses. This transparency is what enables India to continuously improve and formulate realistic, informed policies.
 
Russia and India combined could not add up to a quarter of China's production rates. Not an opinion, a fact.
Russia has to seek helps from Iran and NK, and both Ukrainian and Russian heavily relied on China for DJI, FPV drones and parts.
So, a quarter, I'll say 10%, even that maybe overestimating.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



I knew sukkur base attack will not result in major damage!
Fire does not cause structural damage, it consumes everything...
you can follow the comments in the link provided above to understand better

We have the G model. s sukkur an operational airbase?
 
This was it in a nutshell. BJP dusting off Pulwama playbook and adding a few more bangs for extra effects.

All the Indians now lamenting that IAF should have done SEAD/DEAD missions against PAF first before the so called interdiction strikes against mosques/seminaries ; let me ask you were you at war with Pakistan to target its military infrastructure?

Has any proof of Pak involvement or even Kashmiri Mujaheddin involvement been shred with any independent body other than made up names of "new" groups?
 
This was it in a nutshell. BJP dusting off Pulwama playbook and adding a few more bangs for extra effects.

All the Indians now lamenting that IAF should have done SEAD/DEAD missions against PAF first before the so called interdiction strikes against mosques/seminaries ; let me ask you were you at war with Pakistan to target its military infrastructure?

Has any proof of Pak involvement or even Kashmiri Mujaheddin involvement been shred with any independent body other than made up names of "new" groups?
The Resistance Front (TRF), an offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba and based in Pakistan, claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam terror attacks.

However, India needs a stealth platform or another covert method to target these groups inside Pakistan without triggering its air defense systems. The ideal scenario would involve penetrating Pakistan’s airspace undetected and neutralizing these threats—similar to how the United States has conducted operations in Pakistan.

Alternatively, an understanding could be reached between both governments that would allow India to target these groups within Pakistan—similar to the arrangement under which the United States was permitted to carry out drone strikes inside Pakistani territory.
 
Last edited:
The Resistance Front (TRF), an offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba and based in Pakistan, claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam terror attacks.
Again any proof who they are? some random guy on social media claiming it?
Have the actual perpetrators been caught? or even identified?
 
most Pakistanis fail to understand about how India functions. Hiding such losses is a serious crime in India, and no government, at any point in history, has even tried to conceal wartime losses. This transparency is what enables India to continuously improve and formulate realistic, informed policies.
🤣🤣🤣’That is not the question to ask, what u should be asking is did we achieve our objective’ No that’s not hiding your losses is it🤣🤣🤡
 
The Resistance Front (TRF), an offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba and based in Pakistan, claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam terror attacks.

However, India needs a stealth platform or another covert method to target these groups inside Pakistan without triggering its air defense systems. The ideal scenario would involve penetrating Pakistan’s airspace undetected and neutralizing these threats—similar to how the United States has conducted operations in Pakistan.

Alternatively, an understanding could be reached between both governments that would allow India to target these groups within Pakistan—similar to the arrangement under which the United States was permitted to carry out drone strikes inside Pakistani territory.
LOL - ok layoff the Bollywood sauce buddy.


TRF - Sounds like a Political Action Committee in the US. Very sloppy work building a new offshoot. I bet all those Let folks won't even know how to spell TRF.

And why would India & Pakistan have any understanding on targeting anyone in Pakistan?

Let's get this straight, you are not the US as Dohlaaand has made perfectly clear during the past 4 weeks.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TAC
Dr. Moeed Pirzada says that according to rumours on social media, Field Marshal Asim Munir is meeting Trump during his visit to Washington between 13-15 June 2025.

Field Marshal Asim Munir’s visit to meet Donald Trump - if true - will come at a strategically charged moment in global and regional affairs. After India’s recent military setback and visible loss of credibility in the eyes of its defence partners, Pakistan finds itself in an unusual but advantageous position. The United States, particularly under Trump’s leadership, is known for pragmatic and transactional diplomacy. With India underperforming militarily - from the loss of S-400 components, Rafale jets, and multiple Russian-origin aircraft - questions are now being raised in Western capitals about India’s readiness, reliability, and overall strategic competence. The recent conflict in May 2025 has exposed that the Indian military, for all its hype, is still tactically and doctrinally unprepared for high-intensity conflict with a professional force like China - let alone Pakistan's.

Trump likely sees an opportunity to rebalance South Asia. India’s growing defence ties with France and persistent energy cooperation with Russia - despite Western sanctions - have most likely frustrated Washington. Add to that Modi’s diplomatic isolation, evident in India’s absence from recent G7 discussions, and it becomes clear that New Delhi’s Western alignment is more superficial than strategic. By contrast, Pakistan has proven to be militarily disciplined, regionally restrained yet assertive when necessary, and open to diplomatic channels, even amid conflict - something Trump would respect. This makes Pakistan a more predictable, if not more reliable, actor in the current security landscape.

Trump may also be calculating a diplomatic win in front of his supporters. A high-profile meeting with Pakistan’s military leadership will further bolster his image as a global dealmaker and demonstrate his ability to influence peace in a volatile nuclear region. More critically, it allows the U.S. to engage Pakistan directly at a time when China's strategic presence in the region is expanding through CPEC and defence cooperation with Pakistan. Trump’s outreach may include incentives like IMF flexibility, economic guarantees, or military coordination, in exchange for Pakistan maintaining strategic balance between the U.S. and China, and acting as a moderating influence in the region.

In short, this meeting - if it happens - will not be a coincidence. It will signal a recalibrated U.S. approach to South Asia where Pakistan is no longer just viewed through the lens of Afghanistan or counterterrorism, but as a serious geopolitical player - one that just decisively put India in check. The fact that Trump, not Modi, is initiating such a meeting tells us everything about how the perception of regional power has begun to shift.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Have to give credit where it is due .. the pindi. Boys and their puppets know exactly how to butt kiss trump.. they actually out smarted the Indians


Mr water theory making the right noises

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Ali K chishti discusses India Pakistan skirmish with C Faire.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

I don’t know what the heck this foolish person has smoked before doing the interview with Christine. He could do some cross questioning (rather than cowardly just skipping to the next topic) when she was making skewed and untrue claims. For example, she also said that these Indian attacks appreciably degraded the ability of JeM and LeT to conduct operations. What the heck? This idiot interviewer could not even tell her that those groups were banned long ago. Similarly, she said Pakistan was gonna be circumspect meaning that there will be no more Indian attack on Pakistan because Pakistan will not be unwilling to take risks. That means what?

She also said that Shimla agreement bound both sides to settle all dispute bilaterally and Pakistan has continually sought to multilateralize the conflict. He would have asked what other options Pakistan had in the face of India’s clear policy of not even recognize the Kashmir dispute. It was quite natural what Pakistan did in response of India using Shimla agreement to prolong its illegal occupation of the J&K state.

This guy clearly went into this interview without doing any prior homework. He was just reading questions one after the other from his list. My ninth grader could do a better job than this brainless 'expert'.

I think these brainless Pakistani media persons are more of a liability for Pakistan. These fools should either be properly trained/educated or banned from their foolish activities.
 
Last edited:
₹ 40,000 crore emergency procurement is likely to be for

- Restocking the weapons used during Operation Sindoor
- Fresh procurement of systems that did well
- Procurement of new systems that seem necessary in the light of this skirmish

I guess these are likely to be additional Brahmos, Rampage, Scalp, Aakash AD, Ammunition for AD and artillery guns, Anti-Drone systems and Additional Harpy/Harop kind of drones.

Then there could be additional regiments of AD.

If one looks at this list 40,000 crores doesn’t sound too big of an allocation.
India has a very open procurement process. There would be ads in newspapers for most of the fresh procurement.


And not a single person who did the terrorist attack arrested …

Ps your numbers are usual are incorrect but then again you are Indians and figure fudging is the norm.. 6 planes along with their missile systems gone the replacement cost will be much higher … the s400 system alone is a billion dollars

Congratulations… keep this up !
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top