It was designed to be limited. Otherwise the missile at Nur Khan could have fallen on GHQ if the intention was to cause real damage. I hope you know the meaning of a strike on GHQ. Or would you count it in terms of just a building destroyed with no one inside?
You have still not understood where Pakistan failed in this conflict.
It failed to strike Indian targets inspite of achieving remarkable success in the Air to Air battle. It couldn’t utilise that edge to carry out precision strikes. Firing rockets in the air aimed towards East was the only achievement.
Please don’t be a child and grow up. If you had grown up then you would have known that India has many bases and military assets at same distance or lesser distance from the border as yours. No one is asking for a proof of strike at bases near Kolkata.
Your forces tried to hit 26 bases as claimed by the ISPR. And here you are hiding behind geography.
Wouldn’t it have been better not to waste your missiles since they couldn’t do anything? That way you could have said, we didn’t try at all and had we tried we could have done the damage. Right now it is loss of face and claims of -we didn’t fire Babur and better missiles. It means that the assessment of using Fatah-I was a wrong one. Isn’t that a failure?
All square on ground to ground would take place the day you post a proof.
And we all know it ain’t coming.