Pakistan Navy | News & Discussions

[kimjongun]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Ye Indian Ocean zyada hogya i think , but chalo kher

 

[hasssanali8998]

Indian Ocean

some of you really need to retake geography

 

[kimjongun]

View attachment 184764
some of you really need to retake geography

There are literally so many countries here and claiming PN or even IN for sake "defenders of Indian Ocean" is false

 

[Princeps]

I believe PN will just be escorting ships in the arabian sea not through the strait of hormuz

 

[Mutakalim]

yeah but would be extremely retarded and obvious of them to do so

They are retarded and they dont give a damn about perceptions.

Another threat might be sea mines if PN intends to escort ships through strait. Several reports have emerged in the western media regarding ongoing Iranian preparations of mining the strait.

 

[Ibbi32]

They are retarded and they dont give a damn about perceptions.

Another threat might be sea mines if PN intends to escort ships through strait. Several reports have emerged in the western media regarding ongoing Iranian preparations of mining the strait.

No ones sending in naval ships to gulf for the forseeable future

 

[Yasser76]

Credit to Pak Navy, other then US and NATO, we are the only country escorting our ships in the area. Think this shows we have the trust of both US and Iran. I do not think either side would confront PN

"Net security provider of Indian Ocean" ships nowhere to be seen....

 

[ghazi52]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[T80UD]

She is so sexy

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[kimjongun]

She is so sexy

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Why didnt we went for the 8 Cm 302 package ? would have been great for countering the IN CBG.

 

[hasssanali8998]

Why didnt we went for the 8 Cm 302 package ? would have been great for countering the IN CBG.

i dont even know much about pn but the answer in this section is always the same ,
MONEY

 

[T80UD]

Why didnt we went for the 8 Cm 302 package ? would have been great for countering the IN CBG.

Because they really don't need to, it would be stupid to engage IN in surface engagements, where they not only have more ships and missiles but can fire them from longer range not to mention they have better air defences then our ships.

PN understands this hence the A2/D2 strategy with Submarines and potentially USVs being our main offensive weapons

 

[studsmart]

Because they really don't need to, it would be stupid to engage IN in surface engagements, where they not only have more ships and missiles but can fire them from longer range not to mention they have better air defences then our ships.

PN understands this hence the A2/D2 strategy with Submarines and potentially USVs being our main offensive weapons

I don't agree with this philosophy. we should maximize the equipment when it goes out at sea to inflict vital blow if need be. 4 missiles are a deterrent, they can take out 1 or 2 targets max, 8 of them are a punch

 

[kimjongun]

I don't agree with this philosophy. we should maximize the equipment when it goes out at sea to inflict vital blow if need be. 4 missiles are a deterrent, they can take out 1 or 2 targets max, 8 of them are a punch

Acc to the Chinese here on the forum , the Type 54 APs hull is not designed to hold so many missiles , we have seen the Type 52Ds carry 16 cm302 apart from the multiple yj18 in the vls..so its mostly a structural issue..

 

[kimjongun]

Because they really don't need to, it would be stupid to engage IN in surface engagements, where they not only have more ships and missiles but can fire them from longer range not to mention they have better air defences then our ships.

PN understands this hence the A2/D2 strategy with Submarines and potentially USVs being our main offensive weapons

Dont get me wrong but how the heck we are going to continue our A2/AD strategy if the IN decides to lob for say 14 Brahmos from long distances?
Our AD is not good for large scale attacks , AshBM need large censor fusion for accurate strikes. and we have to keep in mind that IAF will most probably help the IN in attacking our assets and to keep PAF busy (which only has 30 j10s for peer to peer competition )
It just feels all hope lost