Raja Porus
Registered Member
That would be the last formation tbhWhy V corps? Afaik its ussualy western divs that go to ME and weve not done division wide foreign deployments in some time. FC can handle western front so likely 7th division will go
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That would be the last formation tbhWhy V corps? Afaik its ussualy western divs that go to ME and weve not done division wide foreign deployments in some time. FC can handle western front so likely 7th division will go
It doesn't make sense to deploy two different fighter types on such a mission since it would complicate logistics.2 tankers might be for jf-17 . F-16s can also be sent but would be dependent on us and Saudi tankers
It doesn't make sense to deploy two different fighter types on such a mission since it would complicate logistics.
Israel does not depend on the KSA to attack Iran. They use following route:If Pakistan can secure that corridor. This will means no attack from Israel on iran.
By ensuring no attack on iran from Israel using this corridor, you have actually killed the reason for any possible iran-Ksa conflict. So we can actually stop these two countries from going to war with each other by ensuring this corridor is not used to attack iran. So keeping this in mind, I believe the king Abdul Aziz airbase is the perfect station for Pakistani assets.
Also, KSA hopefully have realized that American bases are not an asset but a liability. So they may start shifting their strategy and start focusing more on Pakistani support instead of USA.
Now if KSA can just help us buy more J-10Cs and J-35.
See above.could be an indication that ksa is getting rid of the american bases.
See above.Perhaps one point in the Islamabad talks would be rolling back of US bases?
The KSA is huge. They don't need the PAF to cover entire KSA when they have a well-equipped Air Force to do that. If the PAF deploy F-16s in the KSA, the host can refuel them for an operation, if necessary.sir thats why we need more bases to cover larger area . may be pfx with more range can help on it.
Because you would have to send different crews spares etc for two different aircraft .I dont see why logistics would be complicated. F-16s would fit right into reigional supply chains and i think those 3 c-130s are likely there for limited jf-17 support. If paf expects to send a strong but limited scale and timeframe mission
The IDF does not depend on the KSA to attack Iran. They use following route:
Israel -> Syria -> Iraq -> Iran
The US does not have any military base in the KSA. All military bases in the KSA are Saudi owned. The KSA allows the US to use a military base to conduct an operation in the region, if necessary. American forces are deployed in the Prince Sultan Air Base. Pakistani forces are deployed in King Abdulaziz Air Base.
The KSA is not looking forward to stop an Israeli or American strike in Iran. From where you got that idea, dear? And no military base is a liability. They are designed to withstand attacks and can be repaired
Could be deployed by China, manned by Pak personnel, given we're meant to be getting it apparently, so we may have already undergone training on it. Albeit all this seems conjecture at theoment.do we have hq 19? i think not
sir i did not know about the training on hq 19 . though it was a rumour that China has offered us. i think if hq 19 is there so j 35 should also here in pakistanCould be deployed by China, manned by Pak personnel, given we're meant to be getting it apparently, so we may have already undergone training on it. Albeit all this seems conjecture at theoment.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.