Russia-Ukraine War - News, Discussions & Updates

F-22Raptor said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1802728989024292891
Click to expand...



For every armour invented, there has been invented a penetrator.
For every penetrator, there has been invented an armour.
And so it goes till 1 of the 2 combatants can no longer conduct combat. The end of this war is closer than it was a year ago, but it is still not
close to ending this year. The march to victory continues on both sides.
 
NATO chief Stoltenberg responds to russian threat of nuclear war. The west has nukes, too. The west will increase nuclear arsenal. Dutch F35s are ready to carry out nuclear bombings.

Eye to eye
Teeth to teeth

 
KingQamaR said:
These numbers are mostly plucked out of thin air remember alot of these tanks have been recovered and repaired, which probably means there is a lot less total write offs.
Click to expand...
If russian tank with ammo explodes, I double, the tank can be repaired or recovered. Very doubtful too, if any body parts of tank crew remain.
 
Viet said:
If russian tank with ammo explodes, I double, the tank can be repaired or recovered. Very doubtful too, if any body parts of tank crew remain.
Click to expand...


Abrams, invincible.. only in video-games..or against flip flops insurgents. Ukraine has been forced to withdraw its Abrams from frontline, as losses mount 😉 goes both ways.
 
KingQamaR said:
Abrams, invincible.. only in video-games..or against flip flops insurgents. Ukraine has been forced to withdraw its Abrams from frontline, as losses mount 😉 goes both ways.
Click to expand...

Only 10 Abrams losses, and 31 supplied. Ukraine doesn’t have enough of them and they aren’t designed for defensive operations.

Meanwhile Russia has lost over 3,100 tanks and having to bring T-62s to the front.

There’s a big difference between Ukraine operating 31 Abrams stripped of there DU armor versus the US Army operating 2,000 Abrams of the latest variants with DU armor. All backed with several thousand Bradley’s and air power.
 
First of all any tank can be knocked out secondly tanks are an offensive weapons that. The war now is at a critical point so any tank hanging around the front is going to get picked off eventually.
 
F-22Raptor said:
Only 10 Abrams losses, and 31 supplied. Ukraine doesn’t have enough of them and they aren’t designed for defensive operations.

Meanwhile Russia has lost over 3,100 tanks and having to bring T-62s to the front.

There’s a big difference between Ukraine operating 31 Abrams stripped of there DU armor versus the US Army operating 2,000 Abrams of the latest variants with DU armor. All backed with several thousand Bradley’s and air power.
Click to expand...


The problem is with Western tanks none of them have been really truly tested in the theatre of war until now. And now we are seeing their startling vulnerabilities.
 
KingQamaR said:
The problem is with Western tanks none of them have been really truly tested in the theatre of war until now. And now we are seeing their startling vulnerabilities.
Click to expand...

Even the Iraqis managed some Abrams kills. Abrams has proven itself in past wars. And don’t mistake minimal Abrams operations in Ukraine for how the US Army would perform with thousands of Abrams and Bradley’s with air support.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 11 (members: 4, guests: 7)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top