Shimla mosque row: Protestors break barricades, clash with police

Being a mod, your first job to Ask the source.
Ask whom?
This guy is posting about India through Pak sources.
Which guy?

Why are you so intent on the duties and responsibilities of Moderators? If the source of your unnamed poster was so important to you, what stopped you from asking?
 
The Waqf board administers land, buildings etc for Indian Muslims, what has UCC got to do with the Waqf
.....as a common trusteeship board for the entire Muslim community.

Whether you have UCC or not the Indian muslim community would require a Waqf
Not mandatory, but convenient. Other communities have individual trustees, or institutional trustees, but not, as a matter of historical happenstance, community-wide trustee board.

Other than the ruling Indian party's urgent need to create issues to bring itself to the forefront, there is no apparent reason to suddenly notice and resent the presence of the Waqf Boards. This is entirely an artificially created and fomented issue.
 
Even congressi minister could not stay silent over such brazen misuse of muslim appeasement politics to construct illegal mosques.
You are distorting the facts.

There was no illegal construction; that is an allegation, and the matter was under adjudication.

Take this as a soft warning. Repeating this will lead to action.
 
I am loving the Liberal Secular Meltdown on this thread

By the way on Twitter , all Liberals and Seculars are burning over another issue

CJI CHANDRACHUD welcoming PM MODI at his Home for a Personal Ganesh Pooja 😂😂

They are calling it a RIP to Secularism

Prashant Bhushan, Indira Jaisingh ,Sanjay Hegde ,Arfa Khanum and many others from Left liberal lobby are in deep mourning today
 
I am loving the Liberal Secular Meltdown on this thread

By the way on Twitter , all Liberals and Seculars are burning over another issue

CJI CHANDRACHUD welcoming PM MODI at his Home for a Personal Ganesh Pooja 😂😂

They are calling it a RIP to Secularism

Prashant Bhushan, Indira Jaisingh ,Sanjay Hegde and many others from Left liberal lobby are in deep mourning today
Anyone trying to view something is labelled as a Liberal Secular?
Typical TVA brigade standard operating procedure. When in doubt or being cornered or losing the debate - blame the member and call him a liberal. So predictable
 
Anyone trying to view something is labelled as a Liberal Secular?
Typical TVA brigade standard operating procedure. When in doubt or being cornered or losing the debate - blame the member and call him a liberal. So predictable

In India everything is connected

It is the left liberal lobby which cries when Hindus Assert themselves

PM Manmohan Singh and then CJI Balkrishnan attended IFTAR PARTY

That time nobody called it a mixing of Religion with Judicial independence

CJI Chandrachud was the poster boy of Liberals and leftists

But his tenure has been a huge disappointment to them

Anyway OFF topic

This Shimla problem is just a small thing given the Nation wide debate over WAQF properties
 
Last edited:
Only under this bigoted party's administration from 2014 onwards.

India is a land of PSEUDO SECULARISM , basically a sham practiced for VOTE Bank politics

Hindus have realised that Indian secularism is and was an appeasement tool

That is a huge debate for another thread

That is why Hindus have become assertive and aggressive
 
Illegal construction..
Now time for demolition drive.⚒️

SmartSelect_20240912_175032_Brave.jpg
SmartSelect_20240912_175055_Brave.jpg
 
Being a mod, your first job to Ask the source. This guy is posting about India through Pak sources.
Hey Bhakt. Siasat in Based in Hyderabad, India.
The Waqf board administers land, buildings etc for Indian Muslims, what has UCC got to do with the Waqf



Whether you have UCC or not the Indian muslim community would require a Waqf

The west is largely secular and has multiple boards
Sorry.

Muslims don't deserve any special privileges

Yeah, sure. That would have stymied the more than seven decades of patient educating ignorant Indians in the ways of bigotry and communal hatred that was put in by the RSS, contrary to their promise on being banned and seeking a lifting of that ban.
You missed a very important fact. That Muslims created Pakistan for themselves. If they wanted Sharia based personal laws they should have migrated to Pakistan. No one stopped them.
Your logic is impeccable.

The bigoted section of Indian polity seeks to bait Muslims into violence, and succeeds only in baiting Hindus into violence. Therefore, Indians should condemn Muslims, for allowing others to take advantage of them and make them targets of religious attacks
Wont change the fact that every major riot was started by Muslims.


"According to a law passed by our own Parliament, nothing imposed on us. I fail to see the logic behind criticising another community for the forward step taken by our community."


Did Nehru seek a consensus before reforming Hindu civil laws?

It was definitely imposed.

Sorry to say guys like you fuel Hindutva.

You want Muslims to be treated like VIPs.
 
Sorry.

Muslims don't deserve any special privileges
They got none. All that privilege is in the minds of those who think they would be better off with a legal right to four wives. Totally ignoring the improvement in the condition of women that was partly effected by this and other progressive legislation.

You missed a very important fact. That Muslims created Pakistan for themselves. If they wanted Sharia based personal laws they should have migrated to Pakistan. No one stopped them.
Oh no! Not this old chestnut again. That is the oldest, and stupidest argument about the partition of the country heard.

Let me repeat the circumstances - once and only once, because this has been one of the most closely explained facts ever.

The Muslim League demanded, and got Pakistan for themselves. They did not convince the vast majority of Muslims, even those who had voted for the League during elections, to shift to the new country. The bulk of those who shifted were from the Punjab, and a significant number from Bihar (into East Pakistan, that being closer).

The Indian National Congress, that represented, as shown in electoral results and in participation in INC-promoted movements, was for a nation that would be indifferent to matters of religion in the public sphere, but would leave people alone to lead their parochial lives in the personal area. That is what was created meeting the wishes of the bulk of the Indian people, Hindu, Muslim, Sikh and Christian, Buddhist and Jain, and animists as well.

I am really pained to read such incredibly ignorant statements from you, almost as if inviting rebuke and censure for the ignorance on display.

Wont change the fact that every major riot was started by Muslims.
Shown to be wrong by EVERY commission of enquiry on these matters.
EVERY MAJOR RIOT WAS STARTED BY HINDUS.

Did Nehru seek a consensus before reforming Hindu civil laws?

It was definitely imposed.
What should he have done? Spurned the massive majority in Parliament, the support of the parliamentary party and the support of every progressive element in the country? Should there have been a referendum, because he should have guessed that a peevish, ill-informed eccentric sixty years later thought that there should have been a consensus.

Sorry to say guys like you fuel Hindutva.

You want Muslims to be treated like VIPs.
Sorry to say that idiots who don't understand the issues fuel Hindutva, in far greater numbers than the hard-core bigots. They don't understand that every Indian citizen has the right to equal treatment under the rule of law, and that this is being violated every single day of the current administration, by design, and by the unwitting support of these political naifs.
 
They got none. All that privilege is in the minds of those who think they would be better off with a legal right to four wives. Totally ignoring the improvement in the condition of women that was partly effected by this and other progressive legislation.


Oh no! Not this old chestnut again. That is the oldest, and stupidest argument about the partition of the country heard.

Let me repeat the circumstances - once and only once, because this has been one of the most closely explained facts ever.

The Muslim League demanded, and got Pakistan for themselves. They did not convince the vast majority of Muslims, even those who had voted for the League during elections, to shift to the new country. The bulk of those who shifted were from the Punjab, and a significant number from Bihar (into East Pakistan, that being closer).

The Indian National Congress, that represented, as shown in electoral results and in participation in INC-promoted movements, was for a nation that would be indifferent to matters of religion in the public sphere, but would leave people alone to lead their parochial lives in the personal area. That is what was created meeting the wishes of the bulk of the Indian people, Hindu, Muslim, Sikh and Christian, Buddhist and Jain, and animists as well.

I am really pained to read such incredibly ignorant statements from you, almost as if inviting rebuke and censure for the ignorance on display.

Shown to be wrong by EVERY commission of enquiry on these matters.
EVERY MAJOR RIOT WAS STARTED BY HINDUS.


What should he have done? Spurned the massive majority in Parliament, the support of the parliamentary party and the support of every progressive element in the country? Should there have been a referendum, because he should have guessed that a peevish, ill-informed eccentric sixty years later thought that there should have been a consensus.


Sorry to say that idiots who don't understand the issues fuel Hindutva, in far greater numbers than the hard-core bigots. They don't understand that every Indian citizen has the right to equal treatment under the rule of law, and that this is being violated every single day of the current administration, by design, and by the unwitting support of these political naifs.
Do you support that there should be uniform civil code, and Waqf board properties should be brought under govt control ??
 
Do you support that there should be uniform civil code, and Waqf board properties should be brought under govt control ??
Yes, with the willing consent of all those affected.
Yes, under legislation that ensures an equal playing field for all trusts, trustees and without unnecessary violation of the rights of any affected.

I am essentially against apparently egalitarian legislation brought by these administrations, both the current one and more than one of preceding Congress administrations, because under that platform of equality, there are mean and spiteful measures directed at the minority community.

Waqf Boards need to be brought into the government financing and legal enforcement scope as they are badly ill-equipped to deal with keeping up with their record-keeping, and with their ability to fight off encroachers on Waqf properties.
 
Hey Bhakt. Siasat in Based in Hyderabad, India.

Sorry.

Muslims don't deserve any special privileges


You missed a very important fact. That Muslims created Pakistan for themselves. If they wanted Sharia based personal laws they should have migrated to Pakistan. No one stopped them.

Wont change the fact that every major riot was started by Muslims.


"According to a law passed by our own Parliament, nothing imposed on us. I fail to see the logic behind criticising another community for the forward step taken by our community."


Did Nehru seek a consensus before reforming Hindu civil laws?

It was definitely imposed.

Sorry to say guys like you fuel Hindutva.

You want Muslims to be treated like VIPs.

What special privileges????? They have a board to administer their own property and lands and historical buildings and mosques
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top