The Case for Pakistan as a Civilizational State

Master Chief said:
9:00 onwards, uncle has lost it.

"Taxila", "Panini", "Chanakiya" - are Pakistani by default. This is simple geography. No independent, unified "India" existed that covered Pakistani lands at any time in history. If he is subtly pushing the Mauryan Empire onto us, how exactly did the Mauryans unify their empire? Was it possibly by the same sword that this moron curses out Mughals and British for in this same video?

If he accepts forcible imperial unification by Grandfather Maurya, (thus bringing Indus lands - briefly - under control of a centralised empire, whose capital was thousands of miles away btw), then he can hardly complain when anyone else brings Indus lands under their yoke.

Amateurish pseudo-historical ranting, as is their wont.
Click to expand...
If Imperial borders are an issue then Indias borders are also an issue and Pakistan wanted more land, ergo more ivc archaeological sites


This guy is anti woke anti dei when it comes to African descent people

The simple consistent rebuttal is as follows, this is archaeology not communal politics inserted into archaeology

If that's the game for you, get out the discussion , you are in bad faith and poisoning the academic pursuit

Not much more to say to these guys, the more you say sometimes the more rope they grab
 
r3alist said:
Look at the arguments here.......... someone is reading threads here 🤣


@Master Chief @clutch @hussain0216 @PAKISTANFOREVER @PakistanLVR







Note how they rely on their historical failures as a type of WOKE / dei argument, that it's historically due as compensation.... not belonging to them


The rig veda is NOT very Hindu tbh look how it's claimed, slimey deception relying on ignorance

hence creating separation to amorphous Hinduism should be looked at


Any Hindu claims the indus, this is explicitly said 🤣

Essentially the most articulate argument is uttered through gritted teeth and a forced smile..... It's pre islamic, it's kind of linked to associated Hindu deities so it's ours, the location and continuity of the people is incidental....
Click to expand...


This is a man, no parent should ever trust their child or their daughter with in any scenario ! He has all the hallmarks of a man who looks like a molester ...

Looking at that video, that is what my brain walks away with.
 
r3alist said:
Look at the arguments here.......... someone is reading threads here 🤣


@Master Chief @clutch @hussain0216 @PAKISTANFOREVER @PakistanLVR







Note how they rely on their historical failures as a type of WOKE / dei argument, that it's historically due as compensation.... not belonging to them


The rig veda is NOT very Hindu tbh look how it's claimed, slimey deception relying on ignorance

hence creating separation to amorphous Hinduism should be looked at


Any Hindu claims the indus, this is explicitly said 🤣

Essentially the most articulate argument is uttered through gritted teeth and a forced smile..... It's pre islamic, it's kind of linked to associated Hindu deities so it's ours, the location and continuity of the people is incidental....
Click to expand...



Can Italians not claim Ancient Roman heritage as they are not the same religion as the Ancient Romans? Can the Greeks not claim Ancient Greek heritage as they are not the same religion as Ancient Greeks? These notions are retarded and ridiculous at best.

indians claiming that Pakistanis cannot claim the great ancient civilizations of the Indus Valley, Mohenjendaro and Harappa as we are not the same religion as our ancestors who built those civilizations are also retarded and ridiculous. This is a painful cope for indians as they want to lay claim to those ancient great civilizations that the ancestors of modern-day Pakistanis built but can't as modern-day indians have 0 connections to them. This is an EXTREMELY bitter pill for indian kind to swallow.
 
PAKISTANFOREVER said:
Can Italians not claim Ancient Roman heritage as they are not the same religion as the Ancient Romans? Can the Greeks not claim Ancient Greek heritage as they are not the same religion as Ancient Greeks? These notions are retarded and ridiculous at best.

indians claiming that Pakistanis cannot claim the great ancient civilizations of the Indus Valley, Mohenjendaro and Harappa as we are not the same religion as our ancestors who built those civilizations are also retarded and ridiculous. This is a painful cope for indians as they want to lay claim to those ancient great civilizations that the ancestors of modern-day Pakistanis built but can't as modern-day indians have 0 connections to them. This is an EXTREMELY bitter pill for indian kind to swallow.
Click to expand...
They rode elephants while we built cities. The pain is understandable.
 
PAKISTANFOREVER said:
Apparently they weren't even good at riding elephants either.
Click to expand...
Indeed. A highly unpredictable and stupid (for warfare purposes) animal that often caused more damage to one's own infantry than the enemy's. Probably used best in this region (elsewhere, Hannibal's deployments were mostly exaggerated and Scipio Africanus had an effective counter strategy against him) but even then, not very effective overall.
 
Master Chief said:
Indeed. A highly unpredictable and stupid (for warfare purposes) animal that often caused more damage to one's own infantry than the enemy's. Probably used best in this region (elsewhere, Hannibal's deployments were mostly exaggerated and Scipio Africanus had an effective counter strategy against him) but even then, not very effective overall.
Click to expand...

That's simply not true. The psychological effect of a war elephant in battlefields is a documented fact.
 
El Sidd said:
Provide evidence that it did exist in 1026AD.
Click to expand...

His research & conclusions is sufficient enough and he's not alone. Logic tells me to take his findings rather than a random forum poster who wishes it was otherwise.

What is your proof that it didn't exist back then? We have poems of this language predating 1780 despite not dating as far back then but other sources claim there are poems dating as far back as the 900s.
 
ThunderCat said:
His research & conclusions is sufficient enough and he's not alone. Logic tells me to take his findings rather than a random forum poster who wishes it was otherwise.

What is your proof that it didn't exist back then? We have poems of this language predating 1780 despite not dating as far back then but other sources claim there are poems dating as far back as the 900s.
Click to expand...

If what you postulate is true, provide one instance of historical record of any event in Urdu language that predates the Moguls.
 
Master Chief said:
Excellent article. Very professionally compiled record of the salient themes pertaining to this topic. I have very marginal and cosmetic disagreements with some elements (e.g. for me, Pakistan is the primary legacy nation state of the IVC and India is only secondary. I don't regard them as having equal status in this regard).

Well done to the author/compiler.
Click to expand...

I didn't even read it, i'm just happy this stupid nation called Pakistanis are at last thinking clearly and waking up. Points such as yours will be ironed out in the process.

Good catch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 1 more.
    • Total: 8 (members: 3, guests: 5)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top