chuethnic
Registered Member
Hello there, many of the posters here seem incredibly knowledgeable about Vietnam and China so I wanted to post here to discuss this topic with you. As you all know Chu people formed the Han Dynasty from which Han Chinese are named after and take great pride in but are they really related to modern Han or Vietnamese?
For many years I furiously researched into the origins of Vietnamese and two universal truths were apparent:
Establishing the non Chineseness of Chu:
Despite the historical revisionism of modern Chinese people Chu ethnics were detested by the northern Huaxia and faced extreme discrimination. I think it's well known EAs are deeply racist to SEAs so that's the first clue Chu were racially outside and some type of SEA not Chinese.
Language:
Genetics:
从基因层面上讲,越南人和我国南方汉人的基因高度重叠。根据现代分子基因技术的研究,有80%的越南人拥有O系基因单倍群,这80%的人里面又大多数是O1b1
而贵州、湖南以及东北地区,则有10%到24%的人携带有O1b1
而中国湖南地区携带O1b1基因的人,则在几千年内不断和别的基因融合,造成了现在主要以O3基因单倍群占据主导地位的情况
所以越南人的起源,可能是一支出身于湖南湘西一带的人种,在之后的几千年里不断向南迁移,并到达了现在的越南一带
Vietnamese relevance:
So there it is, I don't think there can be any doubt that true origins of Chu people were Austroasiatic not Sinitic and that their direct descendants today are the Vietnamese not Chinese. As such I believe this has many far reaching implications for Vietnam and China such historical attributions, territorial claims etc.
For many years I furiously researched into the origins of Vietnamese and two universal truths were apparent:
- Vietnamese were never native to northern Vietnam but an intrusive group
- The 'natives' as Vietnamese claim to be were the Baiyue and related to Tais
Establishing the non Chineseness of Chu:
Despite the historical revisionism of modern Chinese people Chu ethnics were detested by the northern Huaxia and faced extreme discrimination. I think it's well known EAs are deeply racist to SEAs so that's the first clue Chu were racially outside and some type of SEA not Chinese.
Language:
- Chu was only granted a very tiny distant inhospitable piece of land that was full of thorny bushes to make their home - the words Jing and Chu both have Austroasiatic roots not Sinitic meaning thorns/bushes
- Analysis of the Fangyan by Chinese themselves showed many connections between Chu speech and AA https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/33979260
- the word for “child” in the Chu language was something like /koːn/ (written as “觀”), which was a cognate with Vietnamese con
Genetics:
从基因层面上讲,越南人和我国南方汉人的基因高度重叠。根据现代分子基因技术的研究,有80%的越南人拥有O系基因单倍群,这80%的人里面又大多数是O1b1
而贵州、湖南以及东北地区,则有10%到24%的人携带有O1b1
而中国湖南地区携带O1b1基因的人,则在几千年内不断和别的基因融合,造成了现在主要以O3基因单倍群占据主导地位的情况
所以越南人的起源,可能是一支出身于湖南湘西一带的人种,在之后的几千年里不断向南迁移,并到达了现在的越南一带
Vietnamese relevance:
- Vietnam was colonised by people that came from 'China', where specically did these people come from? Logically, being the most discriminated and from the closest region of 'China' at that time to northern Vietnam, the colonialists must specifically have come from Chu
- The first Vietnamese kingdom was called Xich Quy and supposedly covered South China, Xich Quy translated means red ghosts. Chu were known to revere the colour red and also ghosts which was considered weird everywhere else in China. How is it possible for Vietnamese to know this name of Xich Quy because it doesn't appear in any Chinese records?
- rulers of chu were called 熊, rulers of vietnam were called 雄
- chu people were also called 荊, vietnamese are called 京
- it is impossible for vietnamese to use 'xiong' and 'jing' in the same context by chance
So there it is, I don't think there can be any doubt that true origins of Chu people were Austroasiatic not Sinitic and that their direct descendants today are the Vietnamese not Chinese. As such I believe this has many far reaching implications for Vietnam and China such historical attributions, territorial claims etc.
Source:
Not Applicable
Not Applicable







