lacy
Registered Member
so many inaccuries.A month ago
You made fun on me when I said BURFIS AESA Radar will detect 1m2 RCS target from 200km away
Now TRTHABER says Aselsan AESA Radar has higher level than its American counterparts.
It is stated that the national AESA radar has twice the sending and receiving capacity of the AN/APG-77 Radar used on F-22
AN/APG-77 Radar detect Aircraft from 500 km away and 1m2 RCS target from 200+ km away
so with the new technological level achieved with GaN modules, MURAD AESA radar can scan a max range of approximately 500 km in the air
That will be enough to detect 1 m2 RCS target from 200 km away to fire GOKHAN ramjet powered long range air to air Missile
and BURFIS AESA Radar will be more powerful than both MURAD and AN/APG-77 Radars
Aselsan MURAD AESA Radar with 1280 GaN T/R modules
Aselsan BURFIS AESA Radar with 2000+ GaN T/R modules
AN/APG-77 AESA Radar with 1.956 GaAS T/R modules
RAFALE Fighter Jet has RBE2 AESA Radar with 838 GaAs T/R modules and detect 1m2 RCS target from 110-130 km away
RCS
RAFALE : 1 m2
F-16V block70 : 1 m2
KAAN Fighter Jet even with GE F110 Engines has much lower RCS than RAFALE and F-16V
- it's not TRT Haber. It's from an unknown paper TR Haber. Having read some of their articles, it suffices to conclude that they have no idea of what they're talking about. The claims are all over the place.
- I did not mock you. I simply pointed out that you are using made-up unofficial numbers to further your claims. you do not know a radar's raw power or its software capabilities to make even an educated guess. you are simply using a few buzzwords like GaAs or GaN and extrapolate your ideas without any system knowledge of the said products.
- Murad AESA has 1152 T/R modules, not 1280.
- The claims in the article are not directly MURAD related. They say the GaN technology can detect 1sq meters aircrafts from 500km(which is bs).
- why do they constantly use F22 as a benchmark? the Americans are retiring them in favor of F35 and NGAD. If we're comparing our radars with the best, then the comparison should be done against APG-85 not APG-77.























