Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Again,you don't get it.as like
View attachment 156476
Its time to take our 6 F-35A from USA which are on storage since 2018
View attachment 156478
That's the irony,the two posters. The one with Eurofighter welcoming Turkey in 2025 and the other from the 2000s with Eurofighter ready to welcome Greece. Not your irrelevant F-35 self-wanking post.
There is one more irony everyone here hasn't thought of yet or has,but hasn't mentioned:in 2005 , Italy invited Türkiye to join the Eurofighter consortium
but Turkiye joined American F-35 program
Türkiye'ye EF-2000 Typhoon Teklifi
Savunma, politika, istihbarat ve diğer her şeyin bulanık mantığıwww.siyahgribeyaz.com
Wasn't there a term on the deal not to use them against any fellow NATO member,especially Greece?
The big difference is that Greece does not have a casus belli against Turkey.As opposed to Greece, which is apparently allowed to use it also against a fellow NATO member? Come on now those are just empty promises from either sides. In any actual kinetic war both Rafales and Eurofighters will be used, however unlikely that is. Especially since there will be a localized maintenance centers and spare part production line if the early reports are to be believed.
I do not want to go off-topic, but are there any info what types will replace the Typhoons in both Qatar's and Oman's Air Forces?
Wasn't there a term on the deal not to use them against any fellow NATO member,especially Greece?
The big difference is that Greece does not have a casus belli against Turkey.
Greece is not threatening Turkey and Greece's doctrine is purely defensive
If Greece does not try to disrupt the balance established in the Aegean by the Treaty of Lausanne 1923 and if Greece does not increase its territorial waters from 6 to 12 miles, CASUS BELLI will never come into play
Greece is threatening Turkiye's vital national security and interests
and Turkiye's doctrine is purely defensive
-- to fight PKK-YPG terrorism in Syria
-- Armenia attacked Azerbaijan
-- Greek Cypriots attacked Turkish Cypriots for ENOSIS dream
-- Greece has wet dreams against Turkiye ... nationalist and irredentist concept of MEGALI IDEA
-- Israel has promised land dream to destroy territorial integrity of Iraq , Syria , Turkiye
Stay calm and don't wake the sleeping giant
Turkiye has never set its sights on any state's territory.
There were supposed to be such similar terms,I don't know if they implemented anything,at least on the part of Germany. Not Qatar and Oman,I'm talking about the Europe front.NOPE. lol, Turkey would never agree to such terms and limitation, unless Greece was made to accept the same terms.
The big difference is that Greece does not have a casus belli against Turkey.
Greece is not threatening Turkey and Greece's doctrine is purely defensive,as opposed to Turkey's expansionist doctrine and policies of the last 10 or so years. Turkey is the one with imperial ambitions: bases in Africa and countries of the Middle-East,Turkey is the country with an aircraft carrier,with plans to build a second even bigger one,the country which has adopted a revisionist geopolitical doctrine(Mavi Vatan).
That is the difference. It's Turkey's government and head of State who have quite openly threatened various countries with war and interventions the last few years: Syria,Israel,
Egypt,Armenia,Greece,Cyprus,maybe even Iran at some point.
The irony is Turkey now just bought 24 used Eurofighters
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.