- Thread starter
- #31
but also in Hürjet
It can't be used on the Hurjet, the diameter and size of the engine is very different.
but also in Hürjet
No, ther is no secret project going on with Hurjet.
No, I disagree with you, the TF35 engine will most likely be used on the Hurjet.It can't be used on the Hurjet, the diameter and size of the engine is very different.
Yes, Hurjet''s design already frozen.Yeah I didn't hear about it either, which is why I was curious. I'm wondering why it happened like that. Was it b/c the designs for the Hurjet as a single engine aircraft were already frozen? I know the KAAN was initially supposed to be in the same class as the KF-21, a medium class fighter, before the F-35 and potential embargo drama, which is why they switched to the F-16 engine b/c thats the engine they have the most familiarity with and in case of any embargoes it would be the easiest engine to reverse engineer/ create a domestic equivalent of.
Thank you, I didn't know.F110 = 118 cm overall diameter, and 90 cm inlet diameter.
F404 = 89 cm overall diameter. Not same.
And no, in the case of aviation engines, reverse engineering is very difficult. It is even easier to design and produce from scratch. Kale Group thought that it could easily copy Safran turbojet engines, but it did not succeed. Thereupon, they designed and produced everything from scratch, starting from the simplest component and test centers. But 10 years late and they had to spend big money.!!
And no, in the case of aviation engines, reverse engineering is very difficult. It is even easier to design and produce from scratch. Kale Group thought that it could easily copy Safran turbojet engines, but it did not succeed. Thereupon, they designed and produced everything from scratch, starting from the simplest component and test centers. But 10 years late and they had to spend big money.!!
Won't we have a single-engine aircraft using the TF35? This seems very illogical to me. Can't we make Hürjet 2?
For easy maintenance? Yes, of course. Easy to produce? If it was TOT, yes. Reverse engineering? No.I read somewhere the reason for switching to the GE F110 powerplant was b/c of the extensive experience with the F110 so if there was ever an issue an engine like the F110 would be the easiest to produce and maintain using the existing infrastructure that exists from the F-16 program for maintaining refurbishing and license producing. Was that incorrect?
For easy maintenance? Yes, of course. Easy to produce? If it was TOT, yes. Reverse engineering? No.
Türkiye's initial plan was to develop a relatively small and purebred air superiority fighter, like South Korea's KF21. The F35 would be used mainly to attack ground targets.
However, when Türkiye was excluded from the F35 program, plans changed. A multirole fighter jet was required. In this case, the first requirement was that the aircraft had both long range and large carrying capacity. Therefore, circumstances suddenly forced us to use an engine of the GE F110-129 size in many ways.
If the USA sells 100 F110 engines for mass production, the first 40 Kaan will start roll off the mass production line in 2028. If USA doesn't sell F110's, Kaan will wait for his domestic engine, just like Altay! This is the situation for us.
I think, except GE F110-129, 2 engine is suitable for Kaan for now.
1- Shenyang WS-15,
2- GE F119.
You see, there is no alternative engine for Kaan.![]()
Ws15 should be available by 2028, it is nearly ready, if Turkey and China could establish close defence relations then this option is definitely on the table.