Turkish Naval Programs

Turkiye developed even 2 different Aircraft in 1930-40s .... but pro-American Politics blocked Turkish aviation Industry
You've told us 50,000 times.

Greece never had a good Defense Industry
On the contrary!

Historical review

The effort to develop Greek modern weapons and weapon systems had already begun since the interwar period. Some interesting weapon systems were the following:
– Assault rifle and GP10 submachine gun of CHROPEI.
– KEA HELIDON training-surveillance aircraft of EAF (Aircraft Factory), later KEA. One aircraft was built, which was used by the Hellenic Navy.
– AEKKEA-RAAB R27 fighter aircraft
– AEKKEA-RAAB R29 fighter aircraft. A number of these were built for the Spanish government forces during the Spanish Civil War.
Bomber/Transport aircraft AEKKEA-RAAB R54.

More recent period

A pivotal point in the efforts of the Greek Defense Industry was the development of the ARTEMIS 30 A/A system, which proved to be quite ambitious for its time - and given that the newly established EBO had no previous experience in the development and management of a complex system. This may have resulted in suspicion on the part of the military and political leadership towards any new effort to develop new weapons systems by the Greek defense industry in the following years.

LEONIDAS S30

In the 1990s, ELVO developed an anti-aircraft version of the LEONIDAS TOMB -which was already in production in Greece, 500 units, on behalf of the Greek army- to cover motorized formations. A system that today would be very useful in dealing with UAVs and missiles, as the brief service of the corresponding Gepard in the war in Ukraine has shown.

The LEONIDAS S30 system was based on the WILDCAT II self-propelled A/A system developed by KRAUSS MAFFEI.

Although there was initially interest from both the Greek and Cypriot sides in such a system, the idea never materialized into a purchase and integration of the system into the Greek and Cypriot arsenals. After a decade and while the needs for the entry into Greek service of a self-propelled V-SHORADS were increasing, it was decided to purchase 54 ASRAD systems with a STN ATLAS turret on a HUMMER vehicle, a system with the same capabilities but which does not share the same armor and agility nor does it provide the same comprehensive A/A protection of the combination of A/A guns and A/A missiles. Also, the possibility of commercializing a Greek system on the international market was lost, with what this could mean for the company itself but also for the other Greek subcontractors, -e.g. EBO with its gun, in terms of profits and recognition.

Technical Characteristics

The LEONIDAS S30 vessel would have 99% common spare parts with the APC version while providing the same protection. It was made of welded sheets of homogeneous armor steel, providing protection to the crew from medium and small caliber armor-piercing ammunition and artillery fragments.

The turret housing the weapon system, radar and target locking system would be adapted to the Leonidas APC,which would provide agility and protection to the system's crew, due to the vehicle's armor and low silhouette. The 35mm guns of the WILDCAT would be replaced by the 30mm MAUSER guns of EBO. The system's ability to add STINGER air-to-air missiles, either in single or double launchers mounted on the outer side of each gun or in a quadruple launcher in place of the gun itself, was also of interest.

ALEXANDER IFV

The development of the ALEXANDROS IFV began at the end of the 1980s with the agreement between ELVO and the then STEYR DAIMLER PUCH for the development of a new IFV that would cover the future needs of the Austrian and Greek armies. Other Greek companies would participate as subcontractors in the new IFV,incorporating their products into the final product. The entire philosophy of the vehicle and the specifications were based to a very large extent on Greek needs, meaning it would be the first vehicle of its kind to be manufactured according to the needs of the Greek army.

When the entire program in Greece faltered, the Austrian company requested permission from the Greek side to also include the Spanish SANTA in the development program. Eventually, the vehicle was purchased by the Spanish and Austrian armies and promoted on the international market as ASCOD.

Once again, Greece missed the opportunity to develop a purely Greek product with the Spanish army as its initial, very likely customer, which ultimately purchased the vehicle.

Technical Specifications

The hull of ALEXANDROS was constructed of welded sheets of hardened armor steel, providing protection to the crew and personnel carried against medium and small caliber armor-piercing ammunition and artillery fragments. The two-man turret would have a dual-feed 30 mm main gun (EBO Mauser MK 30 F) and a 7.62 mm secondary gun (MG-3).

KENTAVROS IFV

In 1998, the development of a new IFV began by ELVO, in an entirely Greek effort to develop a main weapon system based on the experience gained by the company with the production of LEONIDAS and its involvement in the development of ALEXANDROS. Two years later, the prototype was a reality. Despite the initial indifference of both the Greek military and the political leadership, both eventually contributed to further development. The former with proposals and technical details that would bring the vehicle closer to its needs and the latter with the initial decision to purchase the vehicle and allocate funds for the final configuration phase.

And while everyone believed that finally, after almost 20 years of the Greek defense industry being devalued by the political leadership, we would be faced with the first Greek main weapons system that would go from the design phase to the production line, unfortunately they were proven wrong. Once again, the program was locked away forever in the drawer with the unclaimed.

Technical Specifications

The hull of the KENTAURUS was constructed of welded sheets of hardened armor steel, providing protection to the crew and personnel carried against medium and small caliber armor-piercing ammunition, artillery fragments and mines. The one-man KUKA E8 turret would have a dual-feed 30 mm main gun (EBO Mauser MK 30 F) and a 7.62 mm secondary gun (MG-3).


The UFASC II (Ultra Fast Craft) was a concept developed by EBO and presented at the Defendory exhibition in 1994. It was a high-speed, 45-50 knots, catamaran-type vessel with considerable armament. It was capable of carrying two 2.75in rocket pods, a light torpedo between the two hulls, and for self-defense, a heavy 0.50in cannon and a 40mm grenade launcher. One could say that such a weapon system in the hands of experienced special forces personnel would be extremely effective. Small groups equipped with the UFASC, scattered throughout the eastern Aegean, would become the terror of any ship of any size, up to a missile launcher. They would certainly act as a deterrent to any thought by the eastern "allies" for a landing operation on an island in the eastern Aegean, when the small, weak landing craft filled with troops and weapons would first have to pass through the "herds" of the UFASC before reaching the coast
UFASC.jpg

UAV

The idea of developing a Greek UAV or RPV, as the code name for remote-controlled aerial vehicles was, began in Greece in the mid-1970s! The result was the RPV PEGASUS, which was designed by a group of retired PA technicians, while the Hellenic Air Force also joined the production process. PEGASUS was a high-winged aerial vehicle with a cylindrical fuselage that weighed 80-100 kg, had a payload of 20 kg and a speed of 120 km/h.

After twenty years of inactivity and reluctance since the first flight of PEGASUS, in 2000 it was decided to operationally exploit the system by the Hellenic Air Force, which consisted of four aircraft and a control cage. It was decided that the experience gained from the use of the system would be used in the development of a new system, PEGASUS II, with aircraft with improved flight characteristics and integrated stealth features.

The team that developed PEGASUS, when it saw that the program was not progressing at a satisfactory pace and after the involvement of the Hellenic Air Force, founded a company, AEROMICHANIKI, for the development of aircraft. This development resulted in the appearance of the RPV DELTA PHANTOM, which was superior to the PEGASUS. The DELTA PHANTOM had a square fuselage and delta wings, while it was made of synthetic materials, which gave it stealth characteristics. It had a weight of 45 kg, a payload of 25 kg and a speed of 220 km/h.

Another idea was the RPV TELAMON, which was proposed by the Hellenic Air Force and was based on the American-made BQM-74E flying target. The NORTHROP GRUMMAN BQM-74E is powered by a turbojet engine, reaching 515 knots per hour, with a flight altitude of 7 ft to 40,000 ft (from 2.1 m to 12.2 km), and carrying its load to a range of 350 nmi (648.6 km). While in Greece this idea remained on paper, in Israel the BQM-74E was converted into the Delilah cruise missile.

The effort to develop UAVs in Greece began in the mid-1970s. The Greek demon was once again ahead of developments at a global level and instead of being justified, the result was that the Greek people paid several million euros in 2002 for the purchase of the SPERWER from the French SAGEM, when the originality became a necessity, but without any Greek system in development. Where would Greek know-how in this field have reached if we had invested in PEGASUS, DELTA PHANTOM and TELAMON more than twenty years ago?

ARIS

In the early 1990s, the company ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS SA designed an airfield air defense system with the aim of utilizing the huge stock of SIDEWINDER air defense missiles of the Hellenic Air Force. The system would have consisted of a quadruple air defense missile launcher equipped with an electro-optical system and warning radar, but the plans remained on paper. It is worth mentioning that the German Air Force had used a similar system to protect its airfields.


LASER-GUIDED BOMB

In the early 1980s, KETA undertook the development of the first Greek laser-guided bomb. Senior Lieutenant K.Chatziantoniou was appointed head of the program. When the program reached a satisfactory level, it was transferred to the jurisdiction of the Hellenic Air Force for its completion. Although the results from the testing phase were satisfactory, the Hellenic Air Force never proceeded with an order for the weapon.




We had the Artemis-30 made in the '80s

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_30

The ARIS IV AT weapon in the mid-80s as well.

Screenshot_2022-12-09 Η άγνωστη Ελληνική αμυντική βιομηχανία Mέρος 1ο(1).png

Mid-90s the development of Kentavros IFV


1982 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namco_Tiger_Armored_Vehicle

 
You've told us 50,000 times.


On the contrary!

Historical review

The effort to develop Greek modern weapons and weapon systems had already begun since the interwar period. Some interesting weapon systems were the following:
– Assault rifle and GP10 submachine gun of CHROPEI.
– KEA HELIDON training-surveillance aircraft of EAF (Aircraft Factory), later KEA. One aircraft was built, which was used by the Hellenic Navy.
– AEKKEA-RAAB R27 fighter aircraft
– AEKKEA-RAAB R29 fighter aircraft. A number of these were built for the Spanish government forces during the Spanish Civil War.
Bomber/Transport aircraft AEKKEA-RAAB R54.

More recent period

A pivotal point in the efforts of the Greek Defense Industry was the development of the ARTEMIS 30 A/A system, which proved to be quite ambitious for its time - and given that the newly established EBO had no previous experience in the development and management of a complex system. This may have resulted in suspicion on the part of the military and political leadership towards any new effort to develop new weapons systems by the Greek defense industry in the following years.

LEONIDAS S30

In the 1990s, ELVO developed an anti-aircraft version of the LEONIDAS TOMB -which was already in production in Greece, 500 units, on behalf of the Greek army- to cover motorized formations. A system that today would be very useful in dealing with UAVs and missiles, as the brief service of the corresponding Gepard in the war in Ukraine has shown.

The LEONIDAS S30 system was based on the WILDCAT II self-propelled A/A system developed by KRAUSS MAFFEI.

Although there was initially interest from both the Greek and Cypriot sides in such a system, the idea never materialized into a purchase and integration of the system into the Greek and Cypriot arsenals. After a decade and while the needs for the entry into Greek service of a self-propelled V-SHORADS were increasing, it was decided to purchase 54 ASRAD systems with a STN ATLAS turret on a HUMMER vehicle, a system with the same capabilities but which does not share the same armor and agility nor does it provide the same comprehensive A/A protection of the combination of A/A guns and A/A missiles. Also, the possibility of commercializing a Greek system on the international market was lost, with what this could mean for the company itself but also for the other Greek subcontractors, -e.g. EBO with its gun, in terms of profits and recognition.

Technical Characteristics

The LEONIDAS S30 vessel would have 99% common spare parts with the APC version while providing the same protection. It was made of welded sheets of homogeneous armor steel, providing protection to the crew from medium and small caliber armor-piercing ammunition and artillery fragments.

The turret housing the weapon system, radar and target locking system would be adapted to the Leonidas APC,which would provide agility and protection to the system's crew, due to the vehicle's armor and low silhouette. The 35mm guns of the WILDCAT would be replaced by the 30mm MAUSER guns of EBO. The system's ability to add STINGER air-to-air missiles, either in single or double launchers mounted on the outer side of each gun or in a quadruple launcher in place of the gun itself, was also of interest.

ALEXANDER IFV

The development of the ALEXANDROS IFV began at the end of the 1980s with the agreement between ELVO and the then STEYR DAIMLER PUCH for the development of a new IFV that would cover the future needs of the Austrian and Greek armies. Other Greek companies would participate as subcontractors in the new IFV,incorporating their products into the final product. The entire philosophy of the vehicle and the specifications were based to a very large extent on Greek needs, meaning it would be the first vehicle of its kind to be manufactured according to the needs of the Greek army.

When the entire program in Greece faltered, the Austrian company requested permission from the Greek side to also include the Spanish SANTA in the development program. Eventually, the vehicle was purchased by the Spanish and Austrian armies and promoted on the international market as ASCOD.

Once again, Greece missed the opportunity to develop a purely Greek product with the Spanish army as its initial, very likely customer, which ultimately purchased the vehicle.

Technical Specifications

The hull of ALEXANDROS was constructed of welded sheets of hardened armor steel, providing protection to the crew and personnel carried against medium and small caliber armor-piercing ammunition and artillery fragments. The two-man turret would have a dual-feed 30 mm main gun (EBO Mauser MK 30 F) and a 7.62 mm secondary gun (MG-3).

KENTAVROS IFV

In 1998, the development of a new IFV began by ELVO, in an entirely Greek effort to develop a main weapon system based on the experience gained by the company with the production of LEONIDAS and its involvement in the development of ALEXANDROS. Two years later, the prototype was a reality. Despite the initial indifference of both the Greek military and the political leadership, both eventually contributed to further development. The former with proposals and technical details that would bring the vehicle closer to its needs and the latter with the initial decision to purchase the vehicle and allocate funds for the final configuration phase.

And while everyone believed that finally, after almost 20 years of the Greek defense industry being devalued by the political leadership, we would be faced with the first Greek main weapons system that would go from the design phase to the production line, unfortunately they were proven wrong. Once again, the program was locked away forever in the drawer with the unclaimed.

Technical Specifications

The hull of the KENTAURUS was constructed of welded sheets of hardened armor steel, providing protection to the crew and personnel carried against medium and small caliber armor-piercing ammunition, artillery fragments and mines. The one-man KUKA E8 turret would have a dual-feed 30 mm main gun (EBO Mauser MK 30 F) and a 7.62 mm secondary gun (MG-3).


The UFASC II (Ultra Fast Craft) was a concept developed by EBO and presented at the Defendory exhibition in 1994. It was a high-speed, 45-50 knots, catamaran-type vessel with considerable armament. It was capable of carrying two 2.75in rocket pods, a light torpedo between the two hulls, and for self-defense, a heavy 0.50in cannon and a 40mm grenade launcher. One could say that such a weapon system in the hands of experienced special forces personnel would be extremely effective. Small groups equipped with the UFASC, scattered throughout the eastern Aegean, would become the terror of any ship of any size, up to a missile launcher. They would certainly act as a deterrent to any thought by the eastern "allies" for a landing operation on an island in the eastern Aegean, when the small, weak landing craft filled with troops and weapons would first have to pass through the "herds" of the UFASC before reaching the coast
View attachment 142977

UAV

The idea of developing a Greek UAV or RPV, as the code name for remote-controlled aerial vehicles was, began in Greece in the mid-1970s! The result was the RPV PEGASUS, which was designed by a group of retired PA technicians, while the Hellenic Air Force also joined the production process. PEGASUS was a high-winged aerial vehicle with a cylindrical fuselage that weighed 80-100 kg, had a payload of 20 kg and a speed of 120 km/h.

After twenty years of inactivity and reluctance since the first flight of PEGASUS, in 2000 it was decided to operationally exploit the system by the Hellenic Air Force, which consisted of four aircraft and a control cage. It was decided that the experience gained from the use of the system would be used in the development of a new system, PEGASUS II, with aircraft with improved flight characteristics and integrated stealth features.

The team that developed PEGASUS, when it saw that the program was not progressing at a satisfactory pace and after the involvement of the Hellenic Air Force, founded a company, AEROMICHANIKI, for the development of aircraft. This development resulted in the appearance of the RPV DELTA PHANTOM, which was superior to the PEGASUS. The DELTA PHANTOM had a square fuselage and delta wings, while it was made of synthetic materials, which gave it stealth characteristics. It had a weight of 45 kg, a payload of 25 kg and a speed of 220 km/h.

Another idea was the RPV TELAMON, which was proposed by the Hellenic Air Force and was based on the American-made BQM-74E flying target. The NORTHROP GRUMMAN BQM-74E is powered by a turbojet engine, reaching 515 knots per hour, with a flight altitude of 7 ft to 40,000 ft (from 2.1 m to 12.2 km), and carrying its load to a range of 350 nmi (648.6 km). While in Greece this idea remained on paper, in Israel the BQM-74E was converted into the Delilah cruise missile.

The effort to develop UAVs in Greece began in the mid-1970s. The Greek demon was once again ahead of developments at a global level and instead of being justified, the result was that the Greek people paid several million euros in 2002 for the purchase of the SPERWER from the French SAGEM, when the originality became a necessity, but without any Greek system in development. Where would Greek know-how in this field have reached if we had invested in PEGASUS, DELTA PHANTOM and TELAMON more than twenty years ago?

ARIS

In the early 1990s, the company ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS SA designed an airfield air defense system with the aim of utilizing the huge stock of SIDEWINDER air defense missiles of the Hellenic Air Force. The system would have consisted of a quadruple air defense missile launcher equipped with an electro-optical system and warning radar, but the plans remained on paper. It is worth mentioning that the German Air Force had used a similar system to protect its airfields.


LASER-GUIDED BOMB

In the early 1980s, KETA undertook the development of the first Greek laser-guided bomb. Senior Lieutenant K.Chatziantoniou was appointed head of the program. When the program reached a satisfactory level, it was transferred to the jurisdiction of the Hellenic Air Force for its completion. Although the results from the testing phase were satisfactory, the Hellenic Air Force never proceeded with an order for the weapon.




We had the Artemis-30 made in the '80s

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_30

The ARIS IV AT weapon in the mid-80s as well.

View attachment 142975

Mid-90s the development of Kentavros IFV


1982 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namco_Tiger_Armored_Vehicle


You forgot the best one.

The Mighty Minotaur!

minotaur-heavy-laser-anti-drone-system-developed-in-greece-v0-fl9a9kkwtp5a1.png
 
Istanbul Naval Shipyard Commander Rear Admiral Recep E. Yetkin
( 25.08.2025 )



We have begun construction of the test flight ramp for the national Aircraft Carrier.

We plan to launch it no later than 2028. It will enter the inventory in 2030

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



MUGEM Aircraft Carrier
*Full length : 285 m
*Width : 68 m
*Displacement : 60,000 tons
*Speed : 25 kts
*Main drive system: COGAG
*Aircraft takeoff/landing system: STOBAR
1756189751905.jpeg

A naval version of KAAN may be coming

Naval Forces Design Project Office Director Assoc. Prof. Dr. Colonel Uçar

We are continuing to exchange information with TAI to ensure that a naval version of KAAN can take off and land from our aircraft carrier in the event of its production.
1756189688002.png

Source : https://archive.gdh.digital/kaan-milli-ucak-gemisine-mugem-konuslandirilabilir-146515



Turkiye joins the big club

USA :
NIMITZ class Aicraft Carrier ( 332 m ) ... Gerald R. Ford class ( 337 m )
China : Type 002 Aircraft Carrier ( 305 m ) ... Type 003 ( 316 m ) ... Type 004
Russia : KUZNETSOV class Aircraft Carrier ( 305 m )
France : Charles de Gaulle Aircraft Carrier ( 261 m )
The UK : Queen Elizabeth class Aircraft Carrier ( 284 m )
India : Vikrant class Aircraft Carrier ( 262 m )
Italy : Cavour Aircraft Carrier ( 244 m )

Turkiye : MUGEM Aircraft Carrier ( 285 m ) by 2030
S.Korea : CVX Aircraft Carrier ( 263 m ) by 2030
 
I think a naval version of the KAAN is a must

UAV still have higher crash rates and Hurjet is just way too light for aircraft carriers its more of a training aircraft

if your building a aircraft carrier you sure need fast fighter jets
 
there is only one way ahead, electromagnatic or steam we need to make a catobar ramp and launch naval KAAN on it. other solutions are not a real solution
 
285 m MUGEM Aircraft Carrier is enough for KAAN naval version to take off from ski-jump

and the critical rope catching system to be used in the landing of KAAN will also be manufactured domestically.

KAAN currently use 2 x F110-GE-129 Engines ( 29.000 lbf )

but 2 x 35.000 lbf Indigenous Engines will power the KAAN ( 70.000 lbf )
Gross weight : 26,000 kg
Thrust/weight: 1.2


As like Russian and Chinese Aircraft Carriers ( STOBAR ) Turkish MUGEM is also a STOBAR Aircraft Carrier .... Short takeoff and arrested recovery (STOBAR)


Chinese J-15 successfully performed its takeoff and landing on LIAONING Aircraft Carrier ... ( from ski-jump )

J-15
Length : 22.28 m
Gross weight : 27,000 kg
Engine : 2 x WS-10B ( 30.300 lbf )
Thrust/weight: 1.01-1.07

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

1756286220840.png


Russian SU-33 successfully performed its takeoff and landing on KUZNETSOV Aircraft Carrier ... ( from ski-jump )

SU-33
Length : 21.19 m
Gross weight : 29,940 kg
Engine : 2 x AL-31F3 ( 28,200 lbf )
Thrust/weight: 0.83

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

1756286127340.png
 
empty shell take offs, we need full load take offs to scare fionik
 
KAAN empty weight : 16.000 kg
full load 10.000 kg of fuel+weapons in stealth mode

total of : 26.000 kg

T/W ratio : 1.2 with 2 x 35.000 lbf indigenous engines
even 2 x 29.000 lbf engines will be enough

İf KAAN armed with air to air missiles that will be enough
KIZILELMA and ANKA-3 can carry SOM and CAKIR anti-ship / land attack missiles
 
285 m MUGEM Aircraft Carrier is enough for KAAN naval version to take off from ski-jump

and the critical rope catching system to be used in the landing of KAAN will also be manufactured domestically.

KAAN currently use 2 x F110-GE-129 Engines ( 29.000 lbf )

but 2 x 35.000 lbf Indigenous Engines will power the KAAN ( 70.000 lbf )
Gross weight : 26,000 kg
Thrust/weight: 1.2


As like Russian and Chinese Aircraft Carriers ( STOBAR ) Turkish MUGEM is also a STOBAR Aircraft Carrier .... Short takeoff and arrested recovery (STOBAR)


Chinese J-15 successfully performed its takeoff and landing on LIAONING Aircraft Carrier ... ( from ski-jump )

J-15
Length : 22.28 m
Gross weight : 27,000 kg
Engine : 2 x WS-10B ( 30.300 lbf )
Thrust/weight: 1.01-1.07

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

View attachment 143273


Russian SU-33 successfully performed its takeoff and landing on KUZNETSOV Aircraft Carrier ... ( from ski-jump )

SU-33
Length : 21.19 m
Gross weight : 29,940 kg
Engine : 2 x AL-31F3 ( 28,200 lbf )
Thrust/weight: 0.83

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

View attachment 143272


If they are truly going to use the KAAN, I think its better to build out the catapults. The STOBAR with a heavy jet like KAAN, I'm not a fan of, they end up having a very small payload b/c of the STOBAR limitations as we see with the Su-33s on the Russian carrier. Better to put in the extra effort for a Catapult like France did.
 
If they are truly going to use the KAAN, I think its better to build out the catapults. The STOBAR with a heavy jet like KAAN, I'm not a fan of, they end up having a very small payload b/c of the STOBAR limitations as we see with the Su-33s on the Russian carrier. Better to put in the extra effort for a Catapult like France did.

J-15 and SU-33 are heavier and bigger than KAAN

10.000 kg is not small payload ... 16.000+10.000 : 26.000 kg and T/W ratio : 1.2
that will be enough for fuel and air to air Missiles
no need to carry heavy bombs

So , KAAN can take off from 285m MUGEM Aircraft Carrier ( STOBAR )

CATOBAR can launch Aircraft that lack a high thrust to weight ratio such as E-2 AEWC

We can use Helicopter based Radar for airborne early warning and control



Btw we should import CATOBAR System from USA
if the latest technology , then $1.3 billion for an EMALS

At a cost of $1.3 billion, General Atomics is supplying two 90m Electromagnetic Launch Systems (EMALS) and the Advanced Arrestor Gear (AAG) set for future Aircraft Carrier of the French Navy
 
Last edited:
J-15 and SU-33 are heavier and bigger than KAAN

10.000 kg is not small payload ... 16.000+10.000 : 26.000 kg and T/W ratio : 1.2
that will be enough for fuel and air to air Missiles
no need to carry heavy bombs

So , KAAN can take off from 285m MUGEM Aircraft Carrier ( STOBAR )

CATOBAR can launch Aircraft that lack a high thrust to weight ratio such as E-2 AEWC

We can use Helicopter based Radar for airborne early warning and control



Btw we should export CATOBAR System from USA
if the latest technology , then $1.3 billion for an EMALS

At a cost of $1.3 billion, General Atomics is supplying two 90m Electromagnetic Launch Systems (EMALS) and the Advanced Arrestor Gear (AAG) set for future Aircraft Carrier of the French Navy

Spain is planning a 40,000 Catapult launched Aircraft carrier.



The MUGEM is currently being designed as a modular ramp, but there may be modifications to allow for CATAPULT


The aircraft carrier is set to include three runways, with two designated for takeoff and one for landing purposes. Initially, there will be no catapult system onboard. Instead, the Design Project Office intends to utilize a modular ramp. However, the long-term plan involves the development of an indigenous catapult system by Turkish engineers, which will eventually replace the modular ramp.

The Turkish defence industry is also underway at developing an indigenous catapult system. With the ski-jump being modular by design, this can be removed and the ship could be reconfigured as a CATOBAR carrier.

I think the best course of action is the Joint development with Spain, split the cost and built out the joint catapult, rather relying on the US for transfer of catapult tech for the railgun, I don't see it happening, and even if it did, Israel and Greek lobbies will try to cause problems, the Spain route seems to be more smooth. If there is a money issue even with 2 designers, there can be a 3rd party brought in that also wants an aircraft carrier, maybe an offer to the Saudis or Indonesians or whatever. Italians may also be interested in a CATOBAR design.
 
The MUGEM is currently being designed as a modular ramp, but there may be modifications to allow for CATAPULT

As they said , the long-term plan involves the development of an indigenous catapult system by Turkish engineers, which will eventually replace the modular ramp

STOBAR or CATOBAR the important thing is to produce a naval version of KAAN, otherwise, deploying only KIZILELMA and ANKA-3 on a large Aircraft Carrier like MUGEM that we will produce with such a high cost will leave something missing.
 
New details of the National Aircraft Carrier have emerged!

At the forum held at the Istanbul Shipyard as part of TEKNOFEST Blue Homeland, Navy personnel involved in the project explained the technical capabilities of the aircraft carrier:

💢 10,000 nautical mile range: “Our national aircraft carrier will be able to travel to New York and return without refueling.”

💢 40 MW electrical power: Energy capacity equivalent to 3,000 households.

💢 ÇAFRAD radar: 750 km range, to be integrated into the ship.

💢 32-cell national Vertical Launch System: Air defense + offensive capabilities.

💢 Electronic warfare and sonar systems: Features not found in many aircraft carriers worldwide.

💢 Survivability concept: Low radar signature, explosion-resistant design.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
New details of the National Aircraft Carrier have emerged!

At the forum held at the Istanbul Shipyard as part of TEKNOFEST Blue Homeland, Navy personnel involved in the project explained the technical capabilities of the aircraft carrier:

💢 10,000 nautical mile range: “Our national aircraft carrier will be able to travel to New York and return without refueling.”

💢 40 MW electrical power: Energy capacity equivalent to 3,000 households.

💢 ÇAFRAD radar: 750 km range, to be integrated into the ship.

💢 32-cell national Vertical Launch System: Air defense + offensive capabilities.

💢 Electronic warfare and sonar systems: Features not found in many aircraft carriers worldwide.

💢 Survivability concept: Low radar signature, explosion-resistant design.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Thats a very impressive range for a conventional carrier, and I'm glad they are equipping it with its own Air Defense instead of solely relying on an escort ship for protection.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top