I’ll apologise if my last message came across like it was written in Swahili or Yoruba — let me make this one crystal‑clear English so you can actually follow it.
At no point did I claim that “big nations never attack smaller ones.” Obviously they do. That’s how power works. You rarely see a tiny country like Bulgaria declaring war on the US or Russia — because that’s not how the hierarchy of force operates. Same way Israel picks fights with Lebanon or Palestine instead of taking on a country like Türkiye. That’s just basic geopolitics.
So I’m not sure what point you think you’re making.
No one is denying that Türkiye removes PKK militants, supports Azerbaijan against Armenia, or intervened in Cyprus to stop Turkish Cypriots from being butchered. These are all well‑documented realities.
What I am saying is simple: Türkiye is not some irrelevant state that can be attacked without consequences. Türkiye is a major NATO power with real strategic weight. When you pretend Türkiye is just another “small country,” you’re ignoring the actual balance of power and how alliances work.
If you want to debate geopolitics, at least debate the real world ... not whatever imaginary version you’ve constructed.
I'll make it crystal clear to you too:
You guys are mocking the Jews of only fighting "unarmed civilians",thus drawing a conclusion that they are either cowards or can't fight. Which is historically wrong,if you take into account how they fought big conventional armies in 1948,1967,1973,1982.
Secondly,Hezbollah was
the elite commando guerilla army of the Arab world. Hamas was also a fully entrenched and well-prepared organisation. And then came Iran.
Don't tell me Iran is a piss-poor country with a no-good army. What they lacked is a proper Air Force. All the rest,they had ways to make up to. They even had an AA network they boasted about.
Moving on to Turkey. So you guys are mocking the Jews having only fought smaller countries and unarmed opponents. Recent history has also proven that Turkey has done virtually the same.
The reasons are irrelevant. We're talking facts.
Did the Cypriot National Guard have an Air Force? No. Were they a tiny island with a tiny force? Yes. Were they badly equipped compared to the Turkish Army? Yes.
Did the PKK and SDF have an Air Force? No. Modern equipment? No. What were they? irregular forces and terrorists.
The SAA? They had obsolete aircraft and were in shambles. Distracted after years of civil war,badly equipped,distracted by a gazillion other fronts,reduced to basically a militia.
Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh? Already a small force,tiny economy,small population
with majority obsolete soviet equipment. Primarily fighting an already larger army of Azeris.
So my point is,hate them,love them,despise them or whatever,you can't blame the Jews of only picking on weaker opponents,but praise Turkey of having won "heroic" victories.
Get real. These are historical facts,like it or not. If Turkey took on a country like Iran or pre-war Syria nobody could have said anything.