Watandar
Trusted Member
That's some heavy copium. American / Israeli strategic goals were regime change, elimination of Iranian nuke and ballistic programs and unconditional surrender. Which one was achieved ?So the other thread is somehow flexing that Orangeman may decide military operations have met their goals and decide a pause in strikes which means victory for Iran.... come again?
How does that work? Is a remnant leftover of the regime surviving with pretty much its military decimated considered victory for them? Vast majority of the stated goals were pretty much accomplished like decapitating the leadership that existed before the conflict. A strike on Iran's nukes setting the back decades was also accomplished. Destroying Iran's offensive capability or long range strike capability is like 90% accomplished. Destroying Iran's missile production/manufacturing plants has been accomplished. Destroying Iran's drone production/manufacturing plants also accomplished. What's left or what Iran is firing is what has currently survive which makes those drones and missiles more valuable than gold.
One of the goals when striking Venezuela was regime change or coup on Maduro which succeeded, and yeah many folks thought that somehow because the VP of Maduro took over it was a fail at the time, but now Venezuela at the point of a gun has become very friendly and critics have gone quiet. So a remnant of the regime survives with no capability to produce/manufacture BM and drones with no navy and air force with no capability to defend their air space but because Orangeman might like declare goals are met that is somehow a loss for US and win for Iran? That's tard logic if you ask me which nobody did.
Instead the US was exposed as a liability for the GCC , no longer an asset and the panic over rising oil prices due to blockage of the Strait, showed the sheer recklessness of Trump.
This completely unnecessary war could be for the US what the failed 1956 attack on Egypt was for the Uk/France/Israel.








