US Perspective on the Iran - Israel / US War

Just checked Iranian FM is in US.
W t F ?
Iranian leadership has really lost their mind . Shows you how desperately they need a deal while some random lull from mrasi-pur was telling us Iran is winning.
 
Just checked Iranian FM is in US.
W t F ?
Iranian leadership has really lost their mind . Shows you how desperately they need a deal while some random lull from mrasi-pur was telling us Iran is winning.

Except this time unlike in the past, there'll be no spa days or shopping on 5th avenue
 
Snakes are a hard no for me. Everything else I can deal with.

Made easily a hundred trips to Florida. Never once to Orlando.

Went to Orlando in my teens. Destination: Disneyland, Epcot Centre & Universal Studios. As a grown-up, I would love to revisit them, but also add Miami to my itinerary, cause that seems like one of the most grown-up places on the East Coast. Conditioned not to encounter lizards and snakes. Crocs and gators are fine as long as they are at a distance. Although I think these creatures don't travel to the downtown area, or do they?

On a side note: I hope to see the Jacksonville Jaguars make it to the Super Bowl someday.
 
Just checked Iranian FM is in US.
W t F ?
Iranian leadership has really lost their mind . Shows you how desperately they need a deal while some random lull from mrasi-pur was telling us Iran is winning.

They are there for the UNGA meet. The only forum where they can put up their case, despite it being largely inconsequential.
 
When was the last time peers with AC went to battle against one another since WW2, never. So not a good metric.

Still a white elephant v peers.
Oh so you mean if the enemy also had aircraft carriers, the outcome would have been different.

Which completely negates you point that A/Cs are white elephants. It would be a white elephant if:

1) It doesn't bring any value to the owner.
2) It is itself a sitting target that is a liability.

Neither of which is true.

The USN has no peers precisely because we have Carrier Battle Groups and others don't.

Far from being white elephants, these CBGs are USA's "flaming sword of vengeance". The envy of lesser nations.
 
Oh so you mean if the enemy also had aircraft carriers, the outcome would have been different.

Which completely negates you point that A/Cs are white elephants. It would be a white elephant if:

1) It doesn't bring any value to the owner.
2) It is itself a sitting target that is a liability.

Neither of which is true.

The USN has no peers precisely because we have Carrier Battle Groups and others don't.

Far from being white elephants, these CBGs are USA's "flaming sword of vengeance". The envy of lesser nations.
Aircraft carriers have no future.

Even in this war with Iran, US had to keep them 700 miles from the Iranian coast because of the threat of anti-ship cruise and ballistic missiles.

In the near future hypersonic weapons like the Russian Zircon and anti-ship ballistic missiles like the Chinese DF-21 and DF-26 will send aircraft carriers to the trash bin of history.

Add to that AI and missile seekers become smarter and large slow moving aircraft carriers have no place in the wars of the future.
 
Aircraft carriers have no future.

Even in this war with Iran, US had to keep them 700 miles from the Iranian coast because of the threat of anti-ship cruise and ballistic missiles.

In the near future hypersonic weapons like the Russian Zircon and anti-ship ballistic missiles like the Chinese DF-21 and DF-26 will send aircraft carriers to the trash bin of history.

Add to that AI and missile seekers become smarter and large slow moving aircraft carriers have no place in the wars of the future.
And yet, even the Chinese themselves given their military acquisitions and procurements along with the only other superpower in the world seem to disagree with your assessment.

Aircraft carriers are not only going nowhere, but will continue to increase in numbers for the foreseeable future.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top