US Political News and Trump’s China visit

[RabzonKhan]

Zohran Mamdani is running for Mayor of New York City. He operates in a fantasy world where economic consequences seem irrelevant. Having lived in New York City for two years, I can confidently say it’s an incredible place for business, a city full of opportunities and energy. If it were up to me, I would still be there. Unfortunately, my wife, a Portlander, did not share my enthusiasm for the city.

As I’ve repeatedly pointed out, right-wing media and politicians are strategically promoting Democratic Socialists, aiming to push the Democratic Party further to the left. Their ultimate goal? To brand Democrats as socialists and communists who will seize your hard-earned money and tax you into oblivion. On the other hand, these far-left socialists put forth enticing promises, free this, free that, endless government programs.

I consider myself a compassionate person and strongly believe in helping others. But the harsh reality is that we simply cannot afford these extravagant, unchecked programs. We are facing a fiscal crisis. Our national debt has soared to $37 trillion, and the only path forward is to reduce spending and increase revenue before this spirals even further out of control. Sensible financial management is crucial, not unrealistic utopian ideas that will only deepen the problem.

New York City’s GDP is estimated to be around $1.2 trillion, making it one of the largest urban economies in the world. The city serves as a global financial hub, home to Wall Street, major corporations, and thriving tech and creative industries. Mamdani lacks the capability to effectively lead, let alone govern a city of this scale, he can’t even manage one of its boroughs.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

FULL INTERVIEW: NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani on childcare, safety, Israel, more​

 

[RabzonKhan]

 

[RabzonKhan]

 

[Sharma Ji]

View attachment 124629

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[RabzonKhan]

 

[RabzonKhan]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Trump and Elon Musk have a complicated relationship. While they share common ground, particularly their disdain for the Democratic Party, their push for tax breaks favoring the ultra-rich, and their disregard for rules and regulations, there are clear fractures in their alliance. Musk has indirectly criticized Trump’s trade and tariff wars, as well as his so-called big, beautiful tax bill, believing it didn’t go far enough in slashing social safety net programs. As the CEO of multiple multinational corporations, Musk recognizes that Trump’s confrontational stance with America’s top trading partners, especially Europe and China, directly threatens his business interests.

Historically, Trump retaliates swiftly against critics, and Musk was no exception. Trump notably insulted him, dismissively stating, "I don’t need him, but I like him." However, the recent press conference featuring both men would never have happened if Musk weren’t a billionaire who poured more than 290 million dollars into Trump’s 2024 campaign and then spent an additional 20 million dollars on a judicial election, only to face a humiliating loss.

With the 2026 midterms approaching, Trump is undoubtedly strategizing to keep Musk on his side, hoping for another massive financial boost to maintain Republican control of the House. But that may not happen. Musk has publicly stated that he is done donating, likely realizing that his deep involvement with Trump and the Republican Party is damaging his business. Tesla’s sales in Europe have plummeted, its U.S. market share has shrunk, and overall revenue has declined. Even more concerning, if China retaliates, considering Tesla generates more than 22% of its revenue from the Chinese market, the fallout could be devastating.

To make matters worse, Musk’s favorability rating has tanked, largely due to his alignment with Trump and the MAGA agenda. His political entanglement has alienated many consumers, eroded Tesla’s market strength, and placed his global operations at risk. Whether Musk will continue bankrolling Trump’s ambitions remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: his association with Trump has come at a steep cost.

So, in my opinion, as I stated in my previous post, there is a troubling path to their relationship. The tension between their overlapping yet conflicting interests suggests that their political and business alliance may not be sustainable in the long run.

 

[AZ_HighCountry]

View attachment 124766

When it comes to idiots, he's not alone.

Remember the idiot who was afraid Guam might tip over? He wasn't a Republican.

 

[Sharma Ji]

The tension between their overlapping yet conflicting interests suggests that their political and business alliance may not be sustainable in the long run.

Yup, nailed it.

Musk is 'America first' only up to a limit, and that is when the agenda itself starts to hurt his bottom line.. one can dress him up any way one wishes but he is a "globalist" at his core.

Tesla is his baby, the US is his adopted homeland.

Nothing new here, but.. Trump just runs his admin that way.. it'll be a revolving door of people in and people out, quickly of the bigly waala hisaab

 

[Sharma Ji]

Pretty sure Huggsuth sahab won't last long either, an establishment General will be taking over soon..

 

[Davey Crockett]

 

[The SC]

President Trump:

"I was sent for a mission from the Lord and nothing can stop what is coming."

 

[The SC]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[RabzonKhan]

 

[RabzonKhan]

When it comes to idiots, he's not alone.

Remember the idiot who was afraid Guam might tip over? He wasn't a Republican.

Both Hank Johnson and Scott Wagner made undeniably ridiculous statements. Johnson’s claim that Guam might 'tip over' was bizarre, but he later clarified it was meant as a metaphor--an awkward one, but at least he acknowledged the misunderstanding. Wagner, on the other hand, boldly asserted that the Earth moves closer to the sun every year, completely disregarding established science. Worse yet, instead of correcting himself, he stubbornly stood by his comments, doubling down on his flawed reasoning. That level of willful ignorance earns him the distinction of being the bigger fool.

But hey, at least it gave people a good laugh at their expense.

 

[RabzonKhan]

Yup, nailed it.

Musk is 'America first' only up to a limit, and that is when the agenda itself starts to hurt his bottom line.. one can dress him up any way one wishes but he is a "globalist" at his core.

Tesla is his baby, the US is his adopted homeland.

Nothing new here, but.. Trump just runs his admin that way.. it'll be a revolving door of people in and people out, quickly of the bigly waala hisaab

I don't have time to respond now, but I’ll likely get back to you tomorrow. Btw, even though Trump pretends to be 'America First,' the fact is he is also a globalist.