US Politics

[Yommie]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1836430474274836893

 

[Yommie]

Springfield, Ohio resident: We've been sounding the alarm for years​

 

[Yommie]

Marjorie Taylor Greene Directly Calls Out Kamala Harris In Fiery House Oversight Committee Hearing​

 

[Yommie]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1836264001640296651

 

[Yommie]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1836717009741951247

 

[Yommie]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1836281003033399640

 

[Yommie]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1836880588839493745

 

[RabzonKhan]

 

[Yommie]

View attachment 65911





View attachment 65912

Trump is da man. I'm rooting Trump.

 

[Yommie]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1836920142087028915

 

[RabzonKhan]

In other words, he is threatening Jews that should he lose some of his MAGA followers would not like it and there may be repercussions for them. This man is sick.

Trump says if he loses to Harris, "Jewish people would have a lot to do" with it​

22 hours ago -Politics & Policy


Former President Trump said at a D.C. event on combating antisemitism that "any Jewish person" who votes for Vice President Kamala Harris "should have their head examined."

The big picture: Trump received a warm reception at the "Fighting Antisemitism in America" event, but he was accused outside of the summit of "dangerous antisemitism" for saying "if I don't win this election," then "the Jewish people would have a lot to do with a loss."

• Trump spoke at two events in D.C. Thursday ahead of the first anniversary of Hamas' Oct. 7 attack on Israel that sparked a war in Gaza that's killed more than 40,000 Palestinians and 1,600 Israelis.

• He pointed to having a Jewish daughter, son-in-law and grandchildren as he sought to court the Jewish vote.

State of play: "If I don't win this election — and Jewish people would have a lot to do with that, 60% are voting for the enemy — Israel will cease to exist in two years," Trump said at the Israeli-American Council event.

• "If I do win, Israel will be safe and secure, and we'll stop the toxic poison of antisemitism."

Zoom out: Harris had the backing of 65% of Jewish voters in a Pew Research Center poll that was conducted from Aug. 26 to Sept. 2.

The other side: Morgan Finkelstein, a spokesperson for the Harris campaign, in a statement to media pushed back on Trump's claims and said the Democratic presidential nominee "stands steadfastly against antisemitism both at home and abroad and will do the same as president."

What they're saying: Amy Spitalnick, CEO of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, an American Jewish nonprofit organization that advocates for progressive and liberal policies, on X said Trump's speech on Jewish people voting for Harris was "advancing this antisemitic trope."

• "Stop dividing Jews into 'good' and 'bad' camps," she wrote. "Stop labeling those who don't support you as crazy or disloyal. Stop playing into dual loyalty tropes. All of it makes Jews less safe."

Trump campaign national press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Friday in response to criticism of his remarks that the Republican presidential nominee "did more for Israel than any American President in history."

• She cited his overseeing of the Abraham Accords, moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, recognizing Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, the U.S. killing top Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani, ending the Iran nuclear deal, and said he had combatted anti-Semitism in the U.S., "especially on college campuses," and abroad.
• 
  
• "All of the progress made by President Trump in the region has been unraveled by Kamala Harris' weakness and America Last policies," Leavitt said in her emailed statement.

Flashback: Trump received fierce backlash from Democratic Congress members in March after saying "any Jewish person that votes for Democrats hates their religion."

The intrigue: Trump denounced antisemitism at both events, but he did not mention CNN's report that accused Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson, North Carolina's Republican nominee for governor, of numerous inflammatory comments on a porn website's message board a decade ago, including that he was a "Black Nazi."

• Robinson denies making such comments.

 

[RabzonKhan]

Given that Kamala Harris is leading in the majority of polls, Trump has gotten so desperate that he is now fabricating poll data.


https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113165309511954270
New Rasmussen Poll has us leading by 8 points, 52-44. Smart people want a Great Economy, No Inflation, Energy Independence, a Strong Military & Border, NO CRIME, a Powerful Second Amendment, Honest Elections, and much more. MAGA!!! TRUMP2024

5.25kReTruth 19.5k Likes Sep 19, 2024, 10:06 AM


https://www.rasmussenreports.com/pu...n_2024/election_2024_trump_still_leads_harris

Election 2024: Trump Still Leads Harris
Thursday, September 19, 2024

There has been no change in the race for the White House as former President Donald Trump maintains a narrow lead over Vice President Kamala Harris.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 49% of Likely U.S. Voters would vote for Trump, while 47% would vote for Harris.

================================================



These are the Top betting websites available online from Australia, Sweden, Costa Rica, Austria, and the United Kingdom. Even international gamblers think Trump is likely to lose.

 

[RabzonKhan]

As voting in-person starts in Minnesota, South Dakota, and Virginia, the level of excitement is through the roof.

 

[RabzonKhan]

​

Harris victory seen as most likely election outcome, according to CNBC Fed Survey​

Published Tue, Sep 17 2024
Rebecca Picciotto

• Some of the top U.S. economists and fund managers now believe Vice President Kamala Harris will win the November presidential election against Donald Trump, according to the latest CNBC Fed Survey.
• Forty-eight percent of respondents forecast a Harris victory, while 41% see Trump winning the White House. The result marks a shift from late July’s survey, when 50% of respondents said they expected a Trump victory, and only 37% believed Harris would be elected.
• More respondents in the September survey said they thought Trump would be better for the stock market and the economy, but that Harris would be better for the country as a whole.

For the first time in the 2024 election cycle, Vice President Kamala Harris is viewed as more likely than former President Donald Trump to win the U.S. presidential election, according to a CNBC Fed Survey released Tuesday.

The 27 respondents to the survey include investment strategists, economists and fund managers. Among the group, 48% see a Harris victory as the most likely scenario, while 41% believe Trump will win.

The survey was conducted from Sept. 12 to Sept. 14, several days after the first and possibly only debate between Harris and Trump.

The latest forecast marks a shift from the previous CNBC Fed Survey released in late July, when 50% forecast a Trump victory and only 37% believed Harris would be elected president.

The July survey was released nine days after President Joe Biden dropped out of the race and endorsed Harris.

The previous month, when Biden was still in the race, 48% viewed Trump as the most likely winner, while 35% forecast that Biden would be reelected. An additional 17% were unsure or did not know.

Ever since Harris jumped into the race unopposed in late July, her presidential campaign has been fleshing out the vice president’s economic platform and policy proposals. With just under 50 days until the Nov. 5 election, the high costs of living remain the top issue for voters, according to national polls.

Harris has focused her economic pitch on growing the middle class and lowering consumer costs, including by providing housing subsidies, expanding tax credits and deductions, along with cracking down on what she sees as corporate “price gouging.”

Meanwhile, Trump has championed extending and deepening his first-term tax cuts, imposing a hard-line tariff policy on all imports and eliminating some of the Biden administration’s infrastructure investments.

Fifty-six percent of respondents to the CNBC Fed Survey believe a Trump presidency would be better for the stock market than a Harris administration.

The forecasts shift when the question is about the broader economy. Here, 44% see Trump as a better candidate for the economy as a whole, versus 41% for Harris.

Beyond purely economic issues, on the question of which candidate would be better for the country as a whole, 52% of respondents believe Harris would be, while only 37% see Trump as better overall for the United States.

“Assuming Trump intends to follow through on his proposals, a broad-based tariff and a mass deportation, or even a modest deportation of immigrants, would raise inflation and slow the economy to the extent that a recession would likely follow,” Joel Naroff, president of Naroff Economics LLC, wrote in response to the survey.

“Other than that, the proposals of the two candidates differ largely on winners vs. losers, rather than their impact on overall economic growth,” he added.

The respondents also forecast that Harris’ economic proposals would be better for budget deficits and trade policy. They gave higher marks to Trump for how his policy proposals would impact business regulation, inflation, jobs and taxes.

Regardless of who takes the White House, the president’s policy agenda only has partial influence over the health of the U.S. economy.

For some, that’s a good thing. “Given the bad economic policies advocated by Trump and Harris, we really need to hope for divided government. Without it, the deficit and the inflation rate are both headed up,” wrote Robert Fry, chief economist at Robert Fry Economics LLC.

Overall, the respondents ranked the presidential election the sixth most concerning risk to the U.S. economy out of eight possible choices. The top-ranked economic risk was the possibility of the Federal Reserve cutting interest rates too late, or by too little.

On the question of Fed independence, 100% expect Harris to respect the independence of the Federal Reserve. Only 42% believe the same of Trump.

“The independence of the Federal Reserve could be a real issue under Trump, but we have to realize there are only three branches of government outlined in the Constitution: the Legislative, Judicial, and Executive branches,” wrote Richard Bernstein, CEO of Bernstein Advisors. “There is no fourth branch called the Fed, so the Fed has always been only as independent as the established three branches want it to be.”

The Fed is expected to cut interest rates for the first time since March 2020 at its Wednesday meeting.