If they don't think pragmatically then they don't deserve to survive. The need for survival should be put above all else. Forget potential war, just one simple virus can be enough for the extinction of an entire species.
If they are intelligent and unlocked vast space travel (and/or suitably directed EM comms) that way (and we are somehow the very first other sentient life they come across), its very unlikely they have not developed a moral architecture and reasoning that would have made the dangers (of other species to them and vice versa) well known to them already. Technologies w.r.t remote sensing, stealth and protection protocols would be lot easier than vast space travel if human life is of some unique interest in grand scheme of things.
If they are not so intelligent/advanced (and thus some level of undeveloped moral and reasoning system similar or relative to ours) and simply have space travel/comms by intrinsic essence unknown to us (i.e lifeforms in dimensions, diffuseness totally inconceivable to us from what we know of life on earth as our reference).....then we (one or both) are simply kind of screwed if the tiny possibility of vectored contact arises by some random chance.
All the more reason to stay hidden and pray for isolation. Even if we were the most advanced civilization in the entire universe, we must avoid contact. The risks of a potential contact far outweigh any benefits it may provide for a contact may result in our extinction.
Definitely agree. But what exactly would it mean to "avoid contact" in what we can do today? Near zero. Our current contact means (I mentioned the 100 light year radio bubble) is extremely new and extremely small....and extremely attenuated when it reaches to any light year distance of consequence w.r.t even this galaxy. Its why I dont see much great results from SETI long term tbh (unless we get seriously lucky or intelligent life is far more prevalent than presumed after all).....given amplitude of background radiation among other things.
We dont have the energy or interest to do high amplitude broadspectrum spherical transmissions of great amplitudes to get past the attenuation factor at the tech level then (to then wait 1000s or even millions of years for a potential directed response from another). We wont have this kind of energy "to spare" (past all the other things we could do with it) for some very long time.
When we do, yes the dark forest hypothesis kicks in then for us (and any others)....it would be dumb to broadcast expecting the best.
But anything that bypasses EM and space time to begin with (to make this topic somewhat more feasible to begin with given the galaxy size and then local galaxy system and universe size)..... and what benefits these offer to the civilisation then (and then things set into motion by that then w.r.t things not fully understood while harnessing it etc), how we stumble across all of that (and how others did etc)..... well we cant model that now with what we stuck....so why bother trying. It happens when it happens, if it happens.
Humans are often over-curious, greedy and ignorant especially in hindsight (when it comes to something new/unexpected)....even with moral system and reasoning improving over the ages. That's putting aside what happens unwittingly by blind chance.
You should have clarified what you meant by immortal before writing all of that as immortal can mean very different things. Would you consider the tech priests of the Adeptus Mechanicus from Warhammer 40,000 to be immortal? Would you consider the Necron lords and crypteks to be immortal? In case you are unfamiliar with the lore, the reason why I specifically chose to mention the Necron lords and crypteks is because they are the only ones who fully retain their consciousness among the Necrons.
Forget the absolute definitions. Just relative one suffices to get to the bit im coming from....i.e if human life as we know it lasted even 150 years (double the average we have now by the raw biology constraints baked in) with youth, adult and old age all scaled to that etc.
i.e a biologically superior being, our psyche would be different in some crucial ways from that with twice the time available essentially having impacted it over the generations that developed the systems we have now in our snapshot.
This was the fundamental reason for the difference between the elves (eldar) and humans (edain) in the LOTR. To the degree that sometimes it was intuited the elves due to their essential relative immortality did not have true free will (with which they could be judged), rather they were part of the flora and fauna of middle earth (just a very advanced form of it) that drove the whole arc/need for valinor in the early age.
i.e only with limited lifespan of the Edain....life being bright but relatively short, could you develop the psyche from the virtue you had to carefully cultivate and prioritise and act out to be judged.....for free will to be truly imbued as a factor in the first place for life.
These things can be scaled as thought exercises for just the human species hypotheticals....and thus what other life possible psychological consquences could be relative to ours.....thats what I meant with perception of time, aging (and life itself, including its value) when you have a looming mortality as fairly close guaranteed backdrop at all time.
i.e If we meet relative "first born" "elves" out there, we cannot assume things are 1:1 the same in some fairly deep ways.
Gene Rodenberry just bypassed this by making the vulcans (first contact wise for us) fundamentally good. For that story arc with the klingons and later the romulans et al, it had to go that way....because again the story just doesnt progress if it was the opposite.