Qaraca
Registered Member
Ever since the karabah war, my perspective vis a vis Armenia and Azerbaijan has changed, I constantly side with Armenian narrative and tbh it's more like our Kashmir scenario where the actually succeeded and took what was theirs they committed atrocities there is no justifying that but it was always Armenian.
Azeris are Muslim brothers no doubt about but ......
Karabakh was a part of Azerbaijan Republic of 1918-1920, and Azerbaijan joined USSR with Karabakh already a part of it. In 1923, Nagorno-Karabakh autonomous oblast (NKAO) was created within Azerbaijan SSR, but oblasts were subjects of their respective republics. So when USSR dissolved, Azerbaijan became independent within the borders of Azerbaijan SSR, again with Karabakh a part of it. From international legal point of view, Karabakh was and is unequivocally a part of Azerbaijan. There is no ambiguity here.
Alma-Ata protocol established the borders of newly independent former Soviet Republics. This is international law.
Alma-Ata Protocol - Wikipedia
"It was always Armenian"
According to what? If you mean the population, Nagorno-Karabakh oblast was not exclusively Armenian populated. In 1989 the population was approx 75% Armenian and 25% Azerbaijani.
But the matter becomes more complicated and different from examples like Kosovo when you take into account that Armenians not only occupied Nagorno-Karabakh oblast, but 7 districts outside of it that were twice the size of NKAO itself with 0 Armenian population. Half a million Azerbaijanis became IDPs from those areas. For context the entire Karabakh Armenian population is 150 thousand.
"Armenian narrative" is one where reality is twisted. Did you even know about 7 districts outside of NKAO? Or are you saying this was also part of what they "took as theirs"?
This is what Agdam town looked like. Every Azerbaijani settlement under Armenian occupation was looted brick by brick.

Last edited:







