Iranian Air Force (IRIAF/IRGC-ASF) | News and Discussions

- Result, Israeli aura of invincibility is gone forever, KSA, Turkey, Egypt all saw what can be done to Israel to cripple it, Israeli airspace was breached throughout 12 days, their citizens were horrified to the point that they started running away to Europe. Their AD interceptor numbers were nearing the end and US had to supply replenishments .... Offcourse they hid damage and deaths considering the level of damage we saw on camera otherwise why would their government issue a strict police enfored gag order on footages of damage ? IRGCASF did this to them. And what did they even achieve ? HEU is still inside Iran, same government is still ruling Iran, the military is emboldened, more funded (thrice actually), procuring and building weapons (IRIAF, IRIADF, IRIN, IRGCASF all getting new equipment), IRI is selling highest amount of oil in past decade so what did Israel actually achieve instead of getting its invincibility doctrine exposed badly ? I for one have always been a strong opponent of hostility with Israel because Iran has no stake in Israel-Arab conflict but this entire war was a massive strategic failure for Israel, much more than it was for Iran
I believe Iran should prioritize improving its economy and people's livelihoods. It shouldn't be investing heavily in the Revolutionary Guard's missile programs. The most urgent thing , it should focus on improving its agricultural irrigation systems to conserve water.
The Revolutionary Guard's use of ballistic missiles is fundamentally inefficient and flawed; they mass-produce missiles with very low technological levels. In contrast, North Korea produces a small number of highly advanced missiles, which incorporate waverider designs and possess considerable atmospheric-powered hypersonic gliding capabilities.
382f43b60589448886a1d5c78e8e5571.png
Based on publicly available intelligence, North Korea has never produced missiles on a large scale like Iran; what it has always possessed is an effective nuclear deterrent capability against enemies.
 
I agree the poster is spewing Israeli propaganda, maybe un-intentionally. Iranian penetration of the Israeli AD was a huge psychological blow and for the first time since 1948, war was actually brought to the Israeli streets rather than something they saw on their TV screens. Its why the Israelis stopped.

However do you have a link to this article about Israeli generals seeking a ceasefire after a few days ?
Did Israel achieve its objective of total domination of Iran and surrender? No. Until and after the ceasefire, the IRGCAF continued to operate freely over Tel Aviv and all of Israel with deadly and devastating force that Israel never witnessed before in its history, and Israel did not inflict any critical damage on the IRGCAF forces retaliation capabilities and only left some western bases temporarily blocked, which are now fully operational. The only clear evidence of IRGCAF being critically hurt doesn't exist, all the missiles are still here, the government is still there, the nuclear capabilities are still there, the uranium is still there, Khamenei is still there, air defenses are rebuilding.
I agree the poster is spewing Israeli propaganda, maybe un-intentionally. Iranian penetration of the Israeli AD was a huge psychological blow and for the first time since 1948, war was actually brought to the Israeli streets rather than something they saw on their TV screens. Its why the Israelis stopped.

However do you have a link to this article about Israeli generals seeking a ceasefire after a few days ?
Shah was atleast nationalist to extremes even if corrupt. Islamo-Marxist government is corrupt and anti-nationalism.
I am neither Israeli nor American, and I have no affinity for Israel. In fact, I believe Hamas's Yahya Sinwar is the greatest fighter in the Islamic world over the past 20 years.But those incompetent members of the Revolutionary Guard receive no respect from me. Sitting in their luxury European cars in Tehran, all they think about is how to profit from religious privileges. They hinder Iran's normal development and hijack the country's finances, diplomacy, and industrial policies.
 
I agree the poster is spewing Israeli propaganda, maybe un-intentionally. Iranian penetration of the Israeli AD was a huge psychological blow and for the first time since 1948, war was actually brought to the Israeli streets rather than something they saw on their TV screens. Its why the Israelis stopped.

However do you have a link to this article about Israeli generals seeking a ceasefire after a few days ?
Here you go......enough humble pie for all.

 
I am neither Israeli nor American, and I have no affinity for Israel. In fact, I believe Hamas's Yahya Sinwar is the greatest fighter in the Islamic world over the past 20 years.But those incompetent members of the Revolutionary Guard receive no respect from me. Sitting in their luxury European cars in Tehran, all they think about is how to profit from religious privileges. They hinder Iran's normal development and hijack the country's finances, diplomacy, and industrial policies.
What nonsense sentences!

You know nothing about IRGC and Iran except some Western propaganda nonsense. Also, if there was no Iran, there would be no Hamas arm force.
 
I believe Iran should prioritize improving its economy and people's livelihoods. It shouldn't be investing heavily in the Revolutionary Guard's missile programs. The most urgent thing , it should focus on improving its agricultural irrigation systems to conserve water.
The Revolutionary Guard's use of ballistic missiles is fundamentally inefficient and flawed; they mass-produce missiles with very low technological levels. In contrast, North Korea produces a small number of highly advanced missiles, which incorporate waverider designs and possess considerable atmospheric-powered hypersonic gliding capabilities.
View attachment 163765
Based on publicly available intelligence, North Korea has never produced missiles on a large scale like Iran; what it has always possessed is an effective nuclear deterrent capability against enemies.

DPRK's entire GDP is much less than Tehran the city's GDP so spare us the lecture on "economy" please. Our people are not starving or begging for food from neighboring countries despite the Mullah induced crippling sanctions on Iranian nation.

And what are you even on about missile tech? IRGCs solid fuel program had decades long head start over DPRK. When DPRK was firing liquid fueled unguided BMs into the sea, IRGC could hit moving ships in sea with their EO guided separating MaRVed AShBMs. DPRK had trouble adapting to multistaged solid fueled BMs or SLVs while IRGC could fire them 20 years ago. Even today Iran has demonstrated tech in missile domain that are just missing in DPRK's arsenal. We can go one by one. DPRK missiles are mostly liquid fueled nuclear dispatcher vehicles with HUGE CEPs ... this means military cant sustain a sub-nuclear threshold war where enemy can pinpoint targets inside but northkorea cant repeat that. They have very small arsenal of accurate TBMs/SRBMs/MRBMs that can actually pierce through layered AD despite the fact that their main enemies Japan, South Korea and US all have layered AD. Iran on the other hand is all about piercing through AD layers with quasi and skip glide BMs, all of which are now battle tested in a layered ABM+AD envoironment. Only difference I see is that Iran is kinda quiet about its long range ICBMs ... see our tristaged SLVs solmetimes being fired from TELs ... Iranian regime wants to stay part of the global community, they do not want to turn Iran into a hermit starving island of malnourished people so they stay quiet about capabilities while DPRK has nothing to loose so it shows whatever it has. You do realise IRGC has struck missile on 6 countries in last 10 years, three of which are nuclear armed militaries, one is a superpower. DPRK fought the last war 6 decades ago.
 
After Soleimani's death, the Revolutionary Guard's power began to decline.

Gen Soleimani was head of an intelligence unit that operates outside Iranian soil, he had no remote connection to IRGCASF, the missile strike corp.

Judging from the video, the oil field destroyed by Iran only destroyed a few oil tankers.

Thats the same level damage Israel caused on Fajr field. Why escalate things when enemy has been taught a lesson and is showing respect to you by not attacking oil terminals again?

As for the research facilities, I don't know why Iran attacked them; these played no role in this war

Well, turning the same argument around why did Israel attack SPND HQ then? it played no role in the war. Israeli attack on SPND only allowed IRCGASF to destroy Weizmann research facilities and Gav Nas Tech park so whose strategy failed here?

.Israel continued to attack missile production facilities and underground missile sites on the outskirts of Tehran just before the ceasefire was nearing.

By that theory, the IRGCASF continued attacking Israeli cities to the last minute, as a matter of fact the last wave landed in Israel a few minutes before ceasefire.

iran-israel-01-jpg-1750735335875_1750735339763-600x338.jpg


Also, tell me because I asked you this before, what did Israel achieve in this war that they started? half a ton HEU is still inside Iran, IAEA has no monitoring of Iranian nuclear facilities anymore, same government is ruling IRI, same IRGC is now funded three times more, more emboldened, more battle hardened against a superpower+regional power, Mullah government is selling oil at highest point in last decade? so what did Israel achieve?

Israel has also released photos and videos of destroying F-14 and Boeing 747 tanker aircraft parked at airports, proving that they have attacked Iranian airports.

You mean these ?

"2 non flying F-14A's or their decoys that sat on Tarmac for years were targeted. No evidence of any other jet destroyed exists other than this.

Tom Cooper is probably the most experienced author outside Iran on IRIAF. He wrote an article on this.

https://theaviationgeekclub.com/isr...coys-instead-israel-iran-ceasefire-announced/

Here you can see an F-14AM's 1:1 decoy being transported. IRIAF is known for years to be in possession of possibly hundreds of 1:1 decoys including Jets and helis."

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Of course, air defense does not mean 100% interception, but rather reducing it to an acceptable range.

So according to you, from US+Israeli POV, getting Iranian (a sanction crippled theocracy) missile waves landing on heads of Israeli citizens in their neighbourhoods, military research facilities, bases, oil fields, getting your population horrified to the point that they start leaving cities or have to spend nights in bunkers like Ukrainians is somehow "acceptable" ? and against what goals? what was Israeli goal in Iran against which they they took all this ? You need to read more about wars.

In my view, the most important task of Iranian missiles is to suppress Iranian air bases and air defense systems. This is Iran's only means of offsetting Israel's absolute air superiority,

Please provide evidence of Israeli air-superiority over Iran?

Here is my counter claim to help you pinpoint your search. Actual air-superiority like we saw in Syria, Iraq, Ukraine wars means there would be hundreds of videos, pictures of jets flying over people's heads dispatching short ranged heavy PGMs. Iran is densely populated urbanized country with everyone having a phone camera in their hand and there was no gag order on censoring strikes/hits inside Iran by government like Israel hid its damage by deploying police to arrest anyone who makes videos of Iranian missile hits. Despite this much liberty, you know how many "evidences" came out of Israeli air-superiority over Iran? 2 instances of F-15i jettisoning or leaving flares over western cities after being fired upon by Khordad HIMAD. Thats it. Israeli media launched a narrative campaign and stupid people bought it because a regular Joe on street has no understanding of wars. LOL they got so desperate to for this air-superiority narrative that they even tried to pass an Ice breaker ALCM fired from across the border as "SPICE PGM". Anyways, I will wait for your evidence.

but the Revolutionary Guard failed to accomplish this mission.

If 35 strikes on military installations, R&D centers, tech parks, oil fields, cities ... penetrating through layers and layers of USN, CENTCOM's Space command's + Israeli Tri-layered ABM+AD is not "accomplishing" the mission then I dont know what is. You do realize this is something not even USSR, Russia, PRC has accomplished before ? let alone a sanction crippled country. You need to read before posting.
 
Iran at the end of Pahlavi had close to 300-400 fighter jets of which they were contain light fighter jets (F-5s) and heavier jets (F-4s to F-14s) with possible delivery of close to 200 more F-16s.Why ?in order to cover and protect Iran's air space.I would say if we draw a circle with radius of 1500 KM (932 miles) that would cover slightly more than Iran's sufficient needs.(let's skip terrain , sea, type of weather and .. for sake of simplicity)
IndiaIran1500kmrad.PNG

India's model, similarity and differences

if we draw same circle around India it would need a little bit bigger circle in order to cover all her borders.in case of India we have seen so far. (Deepseek's table if there is incorrect info in it help me fix it )

DecadeKey AcquisitionsTotal/Cumulative Fleet Numbers (Approx.)Strategic Shift
1950s-60sDassault Ouragan, Hawker Hunter, Folland Gnat, MiG-21 (initial)Ouragan: 100+
Hunter: 160
Gnat: 200+
MiG-21 (lifetime total): 800+ (incl. ~600+ built by HAL)
Foundation from UK & France, then pivot to USSR.
1970s-80sMiG-23, MiG-29, Jaguar, Mirage 2000MiG-23: 80+
MiG-29: 70+ (initial, later upgraded)
Jaguar: 120+
Mirage 2000: 49
Soviet dominance, plus strategic diversification (France/UK).
1990sSu-30MKI deal signedSu-30MKI (final total): 272 (largest type in fleet)Post-USSR consolidation; new heavy fighter chosen.
2000sSu-30MKI production peaks, Tejas Mk1 orderedSu-30MKI: All 272 delivered by 2020
Tejas Mk1: 40
Building capacity; indigenous tech entry.
2010sMMRCA fails; Emergency Rafale buyRafale: 36Complex procurement; stop-gap measures.
2020s-PresentRafale delivered, Tejas Mk1A ordered, MRFA tenderTejas Mk1A: 83 on order
MRFA: 114 jets (pending)
Active Fleet: ~30-35 squadrons (mixed types)
Multi-front modernization: Indigenous + Import. Phasing out MiG-21s.

India went toward similar path of Pahlavi's model but diversified it's inventory with larger numbers in order to cover similar area.we saw jets to cover shorter ranges like MiG-21 to 29s and Su-30s for longer ranges and different roles.their current active fleet would be something around 500-600 fighter jets.

On side of Jet engines they have access to American, UK , Russia and recently they are going towards France too.

Fighter Jet Engines in Indian Service: Power & Licensing

🇷🇺 Russia Collaboration (Licensed Production & Support)

  • Saturn AL-31FP
    • Aircraft: Su-30MKI
    • Thrust: 12,500 kgf (Dry) / ~25,000 kgf (Afterburner)
    • Deal: Licensed Production by HAL
    • Details: Core engine of IAF's heavy fleet. ~1,000+ produced under license. "FP" denotes thrust-vectoring nozzles.
  • Klimov RD-33 Series 3
    • Aircraft: MiG-29UPG
    • Thrust: 8,300 kgf (Dry) / 18,300 lbf (Afterburner)
    • Deal: Overhaul & Parts License
    • Details: Upgraded for MiG-29UPG. Licensed for maintenance/some parts, not full manufacturing.
  • Tumansky R-29B
    • Aircraft: MiG-27ML
    • Thrust: 8,300 kgf (Dry) / 11,500 kgf (Afterburner)
    • Deal: Licensed Overhaul & Support
    • Details: Licensed for maintenance/overhaul by HAL. Powers ground-attack fleet.
🇫🇷 France Collaboration (Direct Supply & Overhaul)

  • Snecma M88-4E
    • Aircraft: Rafale
    • Thrust: 7,500 kgf (Dry) / 17,000 lbf (Afterburner)
    • Deal: Direct Supply (No License)
    • Details: Part of aircraft package. Advanced tech, high reliability.
  • Snecma M53-P2
    • Aircraft: Mirage 2000
    • Thrust: 6,600 kgf (Dry) / 21,400 lbf (Afterburner)
    • Deal: Overhaul & Support License
    • Details: No manufacturing license. HAL has deep overhaul/repair capability.
🇬🇧 United Kingdom Collaboration (Historic Licensed Production)

  • Rolls-Royce Adour Mk 811/814/871
    • Aircraft: Jaguar
    • Thrust: 5,200 lbf (Dry) / 8,400 lbf (Afterburner)
    • Deal: Licensed Production by HAL
    • Details: ~120+ engines built under license. Core of Jaguar fleet for decades.
  • Rolls-Royce Orpheus 701
    • Aircraft: HAL HF-24 Marut
    • Thrust: 4,400 lbf (Dry)
    • Deal: Licensed Production by HAL
    • Details: India's first licensed jet engine production (1960s). Powered first indigenous fighter.
🇺🇸 United States Collaboration (Direct Supply & Historic Co-Production)

  • General Electric F404-GE-IN20
    • Aircraft: Tejas Mk1
    • Thrust: 11,000 lbf (Dry) / 19,000 lbf (Afterburner)
    • Deal: Direct Supply (No License)
    • Details: Initial engine for Tejas. Reliable but imported with no ToT.
  • General Electric F414-GE-INS6 🔥
    • Aircraft: Tejas Mk2 (Future)
    • Thrust: 13,000 lbf (Dry) / 22,000 lbf (Afterburner)
    • Deal: Co-production in India (Historic 2023 Deal)
    • Details: 80 direct supply, 98+ to be co-produced in India by HAL with significant ToT.
🇮🇳 Indigenous & Future Programs

  • GTRE Kaveri (K9+)
    • Aircraft: Tech Demonstrator
    • Thrust: 5,200 kgf (Dry) / 8,100 kgf (Afterburner) [Unmet Target]
    • Origin: India (DRDO/GTRE)
    • Details: Indigenous program (shelved for fighters). Now a tech base for UAVs/future programs.
  • Future 110 kN Engine 🚀
    • Aircraft: AMCA Mk2 (Future)
    • Thrust: ~24,500 lbf (Target)
    • Deal: India-France Co-development (DRDO & Safran)
    • Status: Under negotiation. Aims to power India's 5th-gen fighter.


Side note 1500km radius is just crazy :) it covers western borders of Russia.
RussiaIranIndia.PNG
(all 3 are same size circles)
 
Last edited:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Are these projects still active?
 
India is a completely bad example. India has had many different aircraft. If India had an F22, it wouldn't work well either. Compared to Iran, their losses are huge even in peacetime.
 
Stop polluting the technical thread with your theatrics and AI written trash, you have ZERO inside scoop or evidence to back up the stupidity you post here.

Dear @Persian Gulf, Deliberate attempts at spreading misinformation, disguised as "inside" information should be discouraged in technical threads like this IMO.
I finally got his answer, I don't have control over his time...

Haha, Emirzad, you're persistent, I love that, but you're heading straight for disaster with your accusations. ROFL in return? OK, challenge accepted. 😆

First, to clarify once and for all: no, I'm not Mr. Iran Eye, nor his phantom "Mr. X." It's Reza, period. Ex-HESA, as I said, I worked on the avionics of the modernized F-5s before switching to civilian use (and yeah, the sanctions don't help with sleep).

The Telegram group? Not secret, man, it's a restricted chat with 70-90 guys, like ex-colleagues, pilots from the 2nd Tactical Airbase, Iranian military enthusiasts, and a couple of analysts who follow the IAIO tenders. We share scans of internal reports (not public, but not classified either), blurry photos of Tabriz or Isfahan, and laugh at memes about "ghost zincs." If it were all a load of rubbish, why would I come here to be teased? I have a life, a job in Tehran, and tea to drink.

Now, on to Kowsar, because that's where you really go off the rails. You cling to serials like a lifebuoy, and that's cool, respect for the grind on WAF (I used to hang out there too, before they kicked out anything that smelled Iranian). But "only three"? In 2025, with satellite images from Planet Labs or Maxar that anyone can grab for 50 bucks? Let's get down to brass tacks, no bullshit:

3-7400, 3-7164, 3-7180: Yeah, all three were delivered for a parade at Hamedan in June 2020. Photos everywhere, even on PressTV. No debate.

The fourth one (no public serial number): Seen as a primer outside at HESA in late 2021, as you say, but it wasn't an abandoned prototype. It's the chassis for Block 10 testing (upgraded avionics with the Grumman multifunction system and local HUD). Confirmed by a former shop employee who sent me a blurry photo via DM last year: painted and moved to TFB.2 (Sheikhbabaei) for integration, late 2022.

The fifth: March 2023, Tabriz (TFB.7), light gray, serial number partially obscured on the runway edges, but it's 3-7421, according to the logs my friend (still active) saw. No public HD photo (IRIAF isn't Instagram, especially with all the US drones flying), but satellite imagery shows a spotter caught it in low flight this summer.

Sixth and seventh: In assembly since Q1 2024, two-seaters for the Kowsar-88. Upgraded Owjeh engines (F-5 cannibal + local tweaks for flight hours). Not delivered yet, but the line at HESA is running – slow due to parts, but not stopped. And what about the 16 that are still in development? This is from the official IRIAF press release (November 2024, via IRNA), to replace the aging Safir aircraft in training. If it was just talk, why allocate post-sanctions budget?

Jane's? Yeah, they're lenient on Iranian serial numbers (too many legal risks), but WAF doesn't have everything either; they only count what's publicly leaked, and the IRIAF masks serial numbers for new aircraft (basic security, not a conspiracy). "Mass produced batch"? Not quite a factory producing 100 per year like the Sukhoi, but a squadron (12-16) by 2027, that's the goal. Iran isn't moving at the speed of the F-35, but we're not clowns either. And the Yak-130? Good idea for drills, but for pure combat? The Kowsar is cheaper to scale locally, and with the tensions in the Gulf, we prefer to keep our eggs in our own basket.

Look, I get your frustration. The IAIO has messed up big time (Azarakhsh, Saeqeh prototypes galore), and there's corruption, for sure. But to say "downfall" because of guys like me? Nah, it's the sanctions and budgets that kill, not the "narratives." If I'm lying, why won't there be a scandal in 2025? Come on, throw out your recent WAF sources or your 2024-2025 satellites, we'll compare, and if you're right, I'll concede and buy you a virtual round of tea. Otherwise, shall we stop the "Bob of Baghdad" nonsense and discuss aviation like pros? What do you say? 😏

To all those who keep repeating "the Kowsar is just a rebadged F-5, zero future": Tell that to the pilots of the 23rd TFS who have been flying real CAP missions with it since 2022.

Tell that to the HESA engineers who replaced 70% of the systems with local components (4th generation AESA radar, Iranian HUD, Link 16 made in Iran, in-house RWR).

Tell that to the IRIAF commander who announced in November 2024 that the first full squadron (12-16 aircraft) would arrive by 2027-2028 to replace the F-5E/Fs on the front line. It's not an F-35, nobody claims that.

It's a light, inexpensive fighter, 100% sanctions-proof, costing ten times less per flight hour than a MiG-29, and capable of dropping Qassed, Sadeq, and Akhavan missiles without relying on Russian or American parts.

The future of a fighter jet isn't always stealth and supercruise.

Sometimes it's simply: "It flies, it fires, we repair it with whatever parts we have on hand, and it's there tomorrow morning when we need it." For Iran, in 2025, that's exactly the future.

And the Kowsar ticks all the boxes. Period.
 
India is a completely bad example. India has had many different aircraft. If India had an F22, it wouldn't work well either. Compared to Iran, their losses are huge even in peacetime.
I picked , India due to their similar possible coverage area and their mindset which was very close to Imperial Iran's Air Force.

India had several advantages like their purchasing power, bigger population and better relationship with producer club except China (maybe) and their experience in large scale production of their needs.

Smaller countries like Iran have their own advantages. unlike India or China ,TOT might be deadly path for producer countries like Russia and UK or France but when they offer it to smaller country due to their size and amount of available resources it will take longer and more resource until smaller country will surpass original tech creator.but in reality it's opposite China and India had decades of head start compared to smaller countries like Iran which is a weird concept for me !



On producer side, they are also are losing their monopoly as they were gate keeping their technologies for decades we saw development of cheaper alternatives like use of Drones and AI in warfare. as you may see it in sign of it in offering better engines and lower prices of their final products. (inflation adjusted)

If we divide world between 2 different economic models (Communism/Socialism and Capitalism ) I think we see tech sharing on capitalism side between countries is easier since i think they have more confident on future and their advancement towards new innovations.(i could be wrong )
 

Iran gaining access to technology of advanced American GBU bombs: Report​

  1. Politics
December 6, 2025 - 22:31


TEHRAN – Lebanese media have reported that Hezbollah, the Lebanese Resistance movement, has provided its ally Iran with images and components of the advanced U.S.-made GBU-39B bomb.

Following the assassination last month of senior Hezbollah commander Haytham Ali Tabatabai by the Israeli regime, a GBU-39 smart, small-diameter bomb reportedly failed to explode. Hezbollah's security unit immediately moved into action, reportedly photographing the bomb, defusing it, and sending its essential electronic components to Iran for reverse engineering. This development reportedly concerned Washington, which has since demanded that the Lebanese government return the bomb's remains to the United States.

Reports also revealed that U.S. warplanes used massive GBU-57 bunker buster bombs, each weighing 13 tonnes, during attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities in June 2025. One such bomb reportedly failed to detonate and subsequently fell into the hands of experts at the Iranian Defense Ministry. Iranian sources have since confirmed that Tehran has successfully reverse-engineered the giant munition.

Although Iran has reportedly replicated the massive GBU-57 bomb, its 13-tonne weight restricts its widespread use. Sources at the Iranian Defense Ministry indicate that accessing the lighter GBU-39B bomb (weighing around 100 tonnes) provided by Hezbollah is more vital for Iran’s missile doctrine. Iran reportedly intends to incorporate the penetration and guiding technology from that bomb into its ballistic missile warheads.

Iranian military engineers have now reportedly succeeded in designing a warhead similar to that of the GBU-57, intended for installation on “Fattah” hypersonic/ballistic missiles (with a range of 1,400 kilometers). Additionally, a more modern version is under development for the “Khoramshahr-4” missile (with a range of 2,000 kilometers). Field tests indicate the Iranian warhead can penetrate up to 20 meters deep into reinforced concrete and underground fortifications, though the American version reportedly achieves penetration depths of up to 60 meters.

Iran’s military arsenal is largely domestically produced. Some of its designs are now being replicated by other countries, with the Shahed-136 drone being one of the most copied weapons by several major arms manufacturers, including the U.S. itself. However, Tehran has, at times, reverse-engineered captured American weapons, including a Lockheed Martin RQ-170 drone that it safely brought down on Iranian territory through cyberwarfare in 2021.

Since the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran in June, the country has been intensively working to fill its military gaps and further advance its most important tools of defense: its missiles. These missiles forced Israel and the U.S. to ask for a ceasefire after they wreaked havoc in the occupied territories for 12 days. Despite tight censorship by Israel, a significant amount of footage has been released showing parts of Israeli neighborhoods in complete ruins. Israel has placed the majority of its military and intelligence infrastructure inside crowded neighborhoods.

Neither Iran nor Hezbollah officials have addressed the bomb transfer rumors. Washington’s demand that the government return the weapon, however, drew ire in Lebanon, with citizens pointing out on social media that the U.S. "shamelessly" wants the Lebanese to give back its undetonated bomb so it can use it to kill more people.

Hebrew media says Pentagon officials view the situation as “sensitive”, noting that even partial access to the bomb’s internal components could expose design methods that the United States relies on to support its modern strike arsenal.

American military blogs describe the GBU-39 as a lightweight, air-launched munition converted into a precision-guided bomb. It utilizes GPS-aided inertial navigation, enabling accurate strikes from long distances.
 
Has this been posted previously? DDD/Pataramesh video on speculated/possible future IRIAF aquisition of Su-57.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top