PAF Conducts Successful Test Launch of Taimoor ALCM

although, a significant achievement but I cant wrap my head around it.

it is a good missile ( an offensive weapon) but not the need of the hour

we need better AD missiles now
 
hasssanali8998 said:
now hopefully they can launch missiles like the ayatollahs
Click to expand...
Imagine if we did - it would be apocalypse man - India is right next door. And India isn't super densely defended like Israel - but of course Iran effed their people even more than us to get those numbers of BMs so I wouldn't treat them as the overall ideal lol.
 
JamD said:
Imagine if we did - it would be apocalypse man - India is right next door. And India isn't super densely defended like Israel - but of course Iran effed their people even more than us to get those numbers of BMs so I wouldn't treat them as the overall ideal lol.
Click to expand...
exactly , perfect deterrent against brahmos .
 
Ak01 said:
Jokes aside, our future strike packages should be consisting of Rasoob's, AZB 81LR and REK TJ. I genuinely believe we need stuff like REK TJ in huge numbers to throw at any indian equiptment we can, with azb and rasoob to penetrate airspace. Screw heavy, limited and old cruise missiles.
Click to expand...
Can't we put an H-4 SOW-type booster and seeker on Mk-83/84s? If we don't have surplus Mk-83/84s, why not just reverse-engineer the H-4 SOW? Or is that a crude design that we REK TJ improves on?
 
Falcon26 said:
Which makes me think, why doesn’t Pakistan invite Turkish defense firms, ask them to set up local subsidiaries or partner with Pakistani private/public firms and contract them to build whatever conventional products you want? The military gets a top of the line NATO-standard product, the local firms can absorb new technology, improve their facilities and manufacturing processes and the Turkish firms get another reliable market. Everyone wins!

I mean the same way American firms are contracted to build whatever products the Aussies, UK, Canada need through their local subsidiaries?

@JamD
Click to expand...
To its credit, the PN is trying to take this step via PMSTP. I think NHQ has broadly agreed on letting the private sector lead with Gwadar Shipyard, if not now, then soon after work kicks off. Moreover, Pak Gov't has signed off on greatly expanding the merchant navy, with plans to source both state-owned and privately owned ships through local production. This will all (hopefully) be deferred to Gwadar (a public-private partnership with domestic and foreign investors), and could one day take on PN core projects too (E.g., subs, ships, etc).

Once the Army and PAF-tied decision-makers see the output on the naval side, I think they'll reevaluate (perhaps via a future generation of leaders).
 
RAMPAGE said:
Can't we put an H-4 SOW-type booster and seeker on Mk-83/84s? If we don't have surplus Mk-83/84s, why not just reverse-engineer the H-4 SOW? Or is that a crude design that we REK TJ improves on?
Click to expand...
What you are describing is BREK, the rocket boosted REK, which already exists.
 
Gripen9 said:
My father, Chacha and brother (1 star) have also served. But we have to dispassionately look at where we stand as a country and what are the roots causes of our decline.
Click to expand...
My Taya, two aunt's sons, my fatehr in law, brotehr in law, etc have served/are serving in the military. I don't discuss military things with them (Taya has died anyway) as I don't want them to land in trouble.
My granny prayed that my father might not get selected, and he failed in ISSB.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top