The Y-9 is a HORRIBLE aircraft.
Its an old, clunky design. No support infrastructure outside of China, etc. The lack of outside support infra is also valid for the Y-20. People tend to overlook this, but the PAF has access to support options for the C130 in the US, in Europe, in Africa, Asia, etc. Literally every continent.
They also have access to spare pools globally too.
You dont get this with the Y20. You're at the mercy of the Chinese, their ability to price gouge as needed and grab you by the balls. Commercially, theres nothing stopping CATIC from hiking prices during wartime, they know we're coming back to buy from them anyway... so they have more of an incentive to make more money.
With the hercs, once again, if tomorrow the PAF wanted a propellor overhaul, i can get them 10 quotes to compare. I cant do this for the Y20/Y9 though. I am stuck with the one supplier.
Plus, the PAF has tons, and tons of c-130 experience. Yes, the J gets new systems and engines, but the engines are the same as the SAAB 2000's, so another +ve, then the PAF has general platform experience for sustainment and support, so another positive.
side note,
View attachment 170605
i wonder why the PLAAF uses Garmin consumer gps for nav. Aera 795.