PAF J-10CE News, Updates and Discussion

[airmarshal]

Does anyone know the registration number on the tail of J-10 which carries this kill mark?

 

[AeronautIR]

Does anyone know the registration number on the tail of J-10 which carries this kill mark?

View attachment 171326

One was 111.

 

[MirageV3ff]

One was 111.

 

[MirageV3ff]

 

[Yasser76]

View attachment 171533

Amazing now to realise the J-10C in that pic could take down the other two without breaking a sweat....

 

[Scorpio]

How many Squadrons of PAF have J10C ?
Secondly both color scheme one cemo other double gray color are in same squadron or different?

 

[Deino]

How many Squadrons of PAF have J10C ?
Secondly both color scheme one cemo other double gray color are in same squadron or different?

According to Scramble, they are all 20 assigned to one squadron, the 15(MR)

 

[Starlord]

According to Scramble, they are all 20 assigned to one squadron, the 15(MR)

View attachment 171764

Any Chance PAF maybe getting another sq of J-10CE?

 

[Michael]

Any Chance PAF maybe getting another sq of J-10CE?

LOL.

You shouldn't ask him that question.
Of course, that includes me too.

Because none of us know.

 

[Deino]

Any Chance PAF maybe getting another sq of J-10CE?

Exactly like @Michael explained, none of us knows this for sure, however I find this much more likely than an early J-35AE delivery ... but unfortunately we have no info on any of the few already seen new-built J-10CEs at CAC.

 

[Starlord]

Exactly like @Michael explained, none of us knows this for sure, however I find this much more likely than an early J-35AE delivery ... but unfortunately we have no info on any of the few already seen new-built J-10CEs at CAC.

I kept this position that at least 1 more sq of J-10CE makes a lot more sense than J-35's in 2026, I mean China needs time to build and do whatever testing is required, plus the platform itself needs time to mature, plus we saw J-10CE hold IAF off including shooting down Rafale so it make complete sense that they order 20ish more units. I just thought some member who keep a close eye on new jets via its serial numbers might have some idea but no issues, hopefully in 2026 we at least get 1 more sq.

 

[mythbuster]

@Michael when you were saying that JF-17 has reached its limit, then you were pointing towards these issues?
My other question from you is what if we have a WS-19 kind or lets suppose WS-19 installed on JF-17 will that brings improvement in having better radar and better climb rate for better AtoA missile release?

Bro , you want a V8 engine on Suzuki ?

 

[Tariq Habib Afridi]

Bro , you want a V8 engine on Suzuki ?

Iss mai kya buraayi..maza tau aayega

 

[Shui]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[MH.Yang]

Iss mai kya buraayi..maza tau aayega

If it is for PAF use, then replacing JF-17b3 with WS-19 is a good idea. The WS-19 not only provides greater thrust, but also simplifies the logistical versatility of the J-35. If it is export-oriented, then it is not a good idea. WS-19 will increase the procurement cost of JF-17b3 by approximately $10 million, and there will also be an increase in later costs. This may not be a happy choice for the target users of JF-17b3.