Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[ShapurII]

exaclty their plan has always been to balkanise iran

A few months ago, if my memory serves me well, Pahlavi's eldest daughter married a Jewish businessman. Pahlavi has no sons. So, if Monarchy is restored and he becomes the Monarch of Iran, the next Iranian King will be a Jew. Unbelievable, isn't it?

In that sense, maybe a unified Iran isn't that bad for the Jews, if the next King of Iran is going to be a Jew anyway.

 

[hasssanali8998]

So, if Monarchy is restored and he becomes the Monarch of Iran, the next Iranian King will be a Jew. Unbelievable, isn't it?

what a insane fall off from reza senior to this cuck

 

[Kyussis]

They will say what they have always said
"Kar e khodeshoon bood"

 

[ShapurII]

what a insane fall off from reza senior to this cuck

Hard times create strong men. His grandfather was a brigadier in the Qajar army, not a kiddo with money. This fool is a prince that has spent most of his life in prosperity with over $300 million that his father took with them out of Iran in 1979. $300 million in 1979 is about $1.3 billion as of 2026.

 

[Meengla]

We will come to better understanding of what's happening by following Max Blumenthal and Trita Parsi when it comes to the tri-nation geopolitics of America-Israel-Iran.
Per Max, it is Netanyahu who mostly wants to attack Iran and may even engineer a false-flag. For Trump, even a few dozen American bodybags are going to doom his Presidency while the Israelis know what needs to be done and would absorb their own bodybags.

Also notice what Max is saying: There is not even an attempt to 'manufacture consent' in America to attack Iran; how interesting and alarming America has become since the 2003 attack on Iraq!

 

[Immortals]

That would be genocide. US military will not do that.

 

[Kyussis]

what a insane fall off from reza senior to this cuck

You act like the Pahlavis were ever anything but Anglo American stooges.

 

[hasssanali8998]

You act like the Pahlavis were ever anything but Anglo American stooges.

yes
but he was pretty good for pakistan and honestly thats all i care about

 

[Bahrami]

View attachment 179821

This list is incomplete. Lancet Report was 600.000+ dead people as direct result of physical violence.

 

[Immortals]

A few months ago, if my memory serves me well, Pahlavi's eldest daughter married a Jewish businessman. Pahlavi has no sons. So, if Monarchy is restored and he becomes the Monarch of Iran, the next Iranian King will be a Jew. Unbelievable, isn't it?

In that sense, maybe a unified Iran isn't that bad for the Jews, if the next King of Iran is going to be a Jew anyway.

Again you speak on matters with little accuracy.

That’s not how “royale” lines work. You don’t get to switch (patriarchy vs matriarchy monarchy) whenever you want. This isn’t Game of Thrones.

If Fake King doesn’t have a heir then the successor claim to throne goes to the heirs of Alireza Phalavi (the other son of Reza shah) of which there are 4 sons currently alive and one also has an heir.

Lastly Iranian constitution required that both the mother and father of an heir had to be of Iranian descent.

So unless like Saudi “royale” family you want to make a joke of a custom and insert MBS at the head of the family just because then Iran would have to do a similar move and completely show what a farce the royale line is.

All this is a joke either way. A family who didn’t have even 100 years of reign. Whose grandfather was a officer in the worst military Iran has ever known (Qajar) and who bowed to his western masters and abdicated when they told him to step aside.

This current big nose Shah has daughters who cannot even speak Farsi properly let alone read or write Farsi. They wouldn’t survive 2 seconds inside that mafia society.

 

[ShapurII]

Again you speak on matters with little accuracy.

That’s not how “royale” lines work. You don’t get to switch (patriarchy vs matriarchy monarchy) whenever you want. This isn’t Game of Thrones.

If Fake King doesn’t have a heir then the successor claim to throne goes to the heirs of Alireza Phalavi (other son Reza shah) of which there are 4 sons currently alive and one also has an heir.

Lastly Iranian constitution required that both the mother and father of an heir had to be of Iranian descent.

All this is a joke either way of a family who didn’t have even 100 years of reign. Whose grandfather was a officer in the worst military Iran has ever known (Qajar) and who bowed to his western masters and abdicated when they told him to step aside.

His daughter cannot even speak Farsi properly let alone read or write Farsi. They wouldn’t survive 2 seconds inside that mafia society.

Your post is baseless. What Iranian constitution? You are talking about something that hasn't been written yet. How do you know what the future constitution of an alleged constitutional monarchy in Iran would look like to begin with? It could very well be written to be like the British royal tradition of male-preferred primogeniture. I don't see why that is impossible.

 

[Shags101]

Again you speak on matters with little accuracy.

That’s not how “royale” lines work. You don’t get to switch (patriarchy vs matriarchy monarchy) whenever you want. This isn’t Game of Thrones.

If Fake King doesn’t have a heir then the successor claim to throne goes to the heirs of Alireza Phalavi (the other son of Reza shah) of which there are 4 sons currently alive and one also has an heir.

Lastly Iranian constitution required that both the mother and father of an heir had to be of Iranian descent.

So unless like Saudi “royale” family you want to make a joke of a custom and insert MBS at the head of the family just because then Iran would have to do a similar move and completely show what a farce the royale line is.

All this is a joke either way. A family who didn’t have even 100 years of reign. Whose grandfather was a officer in the worst military Iran has ever known (Qajar) and who bowed to his western masters and abdicated when they told him to step aside.

This current big nose Shah has daughters who cannot even speak Farsi properly let alone read or write Farsi. They wouldn’t survive 2 seconds inside that mafia society.

I’m telling you it is funny reading up on the “shahs”it really just some guy who said you can all call me king of Iran we would call that crazy talk today

 

[Immortals]

Your post is baseless. What Iranian constitution?

The Iranian constitution of 1906 and how the succession worked for thousands of years thru our history.

But of course to a Phalavi supporter (I know you will deny it, but it’s quite obvious) like yourself tradition means very little. You just want your big bird on the throne.

How do you know what the future constitution of an alleged constitutional monarchy in Iran would look like to begin with? It could very well be written to be like the British royal tradition of male-preferred primogeniture. I don't see why that is impossible.

Because that is not how it worked in Iran for thousands of years. Succession is thru the sons that’s why it’s called HEIRS. That’s why for thousands of years kings tried to have SONS. Not just in Iran but across the ancient world.

Why would Iran want to copy the other cuck pedophile British Royale family? Have some shame man.

Reza Shah had 2 sons. Alireza Phalavi had 3 sons. They have more claim to this imaginary throne than some half Jewish half Iranian son of some LA socialite mother.

 

[ShapurII]

The Iranian constitution of 1906 and how the succession worked for thousands of years thru our history.

But of course to a Phalavi supporter (I know you will deny it, but it’s quite obvious) like yourself tradition means very little. You just want your big bird on the throne.

What I support or not support is completely irrelevant to the hypotheses or implications of your argument. Your argument claims that the future constitution of Iran, if monarchy is reestablished, has to follow the 1905 constitution. That's false, as a new constitution will be written from scratch. The rest of your post is blah blah blah. Iran could easily adopt a male-preferred primogeniture like Britain. There's absolutely no reason for that to be impossible in a hypothetical constitutional monarchy in future.

 

[Immortals]

I’m telling you it is funny reading up on the “shahs”it really just some guy who said you can all call me king of Iran we would call that crazy talk today

Imagine Saddam was overthrown.

Then imagine US took his general that got absolutely obliterated in Persian Gulf War 1 and Persian Gulf 2 and said “you are in charge now, follow our orders”.

And then that said General said no I don’t want to be called General, call me King like the Babylonian Kings.

And then you had this fake King’s family with no ties to any Babylonian ancestor rule for half a century.

That’s basically the Phalavi family in a nutshell. Except in case of Iran we had a democratic PM led government that was overthrown. Their royale reign literally lasted for 53 years. A joke in scheme of our histories time.

Now some people want to switch a theological dictatorship for some LA socialite dictatorship, rather than a true democratic government. I swear Iranians are retarded when it comes to politics. Absolutely retarded.