PakSword
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Why not ? The energy crisis impact on various countries can be a thread of it's own. In the US , gas prices have shot up considerably in just one week!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why not ? The energy crisis impact on various countries can be a thread of it's own. In the US , gas prices have shot up considerably in just one week!
This is an irrelevant point.Neither Israel or Iran signed the cluster munitions treaty and Israel used cluster munitions in Gaza as well - so it is a mute point ....
wow.. somebody posted earlier that it was hezbullah did this?Oil Refinery in Haifa struck
Manufacture what exactly? Who's going to buy made in American with its high labor costs and the high value of USD? They will have to devalue their own currency. And then how many Americans can even afford to work for $1 an hour?I wrote about it before. I’ll do a short version again. US wants to replace China as the global manufacturing base. The only way it can do that is with AI, and AI needs energy. If the US wins this war, they will control almost of the worlds oil flow. Then the only independent country left that can sell oil to China is Russia. This war is an existential war for China. But the chinese are unfortunately not the warrior type.
The US has already sank so many Iranian Navy ships.The Iranians need to think very hard before engaging the aircraft carrier.
An attack on the carrier and inflicting damage would mean escalation ladder going up multifolds. Keeping it an arm distance is one thing but inflicting damage is another thing.
One for @JamDWith this "Kheibar" type of cluster missile, around what stage of traversal/trajectory does it fragment into multiple munitions? And would a single interceptor or multiple interceptors require expenditure to stop that group of fragmented munitions?
The Iranians need to think very hard before engaging the aircraft carrier.
An attack on the carrier and inflicting damage would mean escalation ladder going up multifolds. Keeping it an arm distance is one thing but inflicting damage is another thing.
Whatever they do they have a short window to do it. Once the BUFFS and Bones get airborn it wont be good.I fundamentally disagree with this logic.
If Iran can hit that aircraft carrier, it must. Iran has failed to demonstrate that it can cause real harm to "any" part of the USA inventory except for static radars, where it has done well. The lack of damage to the war machine is only further encouraging Trump to push further into this war. Just look at how he responded to the Iranian statement earlier today, he saw victory in that statement, and it has to be corrected by the IRGC spokesman later on during the day.
If Iran can actually hit an aircraft carrier, they must must must do it asap .
Is there any evidence for that? That would be a pretty bad situation if random groups can launch missiles to foreign countries from a functioning State.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.