Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[Yasser76]

helping them hunt Shaheds I guess, still strange

We do not know. We can only speculate, could be that or could be totally unrelated to that

 

[Persian Gulf]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Ghalibaf says Iran will destroy regional energy and critical infrastructure if Trump attacks Iran's power plants

 

[AZ_HighCountry]

helping them hunt Shaheds I guess, still strange

Looked up the company. This might give a bit of a hint:

Home - ASELSAN

Home-ASELSAN

www.aselsan.com

 

[Arash]

are Turks flying Qatari helicopters? that's weird.

Likely, Qatari an Gulf Arabs generally never operate their weaponry on their own....

 

[Ali_Baba]

Pakistan needs to look at this through a medium and long term perspective.

Reliance on the Gulf puppet regimes is actually making things worse for Pakistan and countries like Bangladesh as they are a "back stop" to poor economic governance.

Yes things will be worse in the short-term but Iranian destruction of GCC energy facilities and economy will actually make things better in long term for Muslim world in general.

KSA is actively helping Zio-US attack Iran through basing and over-fly rights and so Iran has every right to attack KSA.

Iran is not attacking Saudi Arabia, Iran is attacking American installations, weapons and American military personnel in Saudi Arabia.

The distinction is important.

 

[Ali_Baba]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Looks like it is releasing flares preemptively only. No hit.

 

[kobra]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Bengal71]

I believe
1. The concept of STRETIGIC DEPTH in AFGHANISTAN is where Pakistan and Iran meet, converge and are mutual in context of security. As Israel/India trying to use it against both Pakistan and Iran.
2. Pakistan Iran share enough resources within themselves to become a powerhouse.
3. This powerhouse is backed up by almost 2 million strong armed forces not as a showpieces but capable of fighting.
4. Afghanistan is landlocked and also have resources and can be helped through giving them fair share.

LET PIA BE BACK IN BUSINESS
PAKISTAN IRAN AFGHANISTAN...
Why you gonna let ZIONIST tap into resources that belong to the people that live in the region who are Muslims and it's duty of both countries to safeguard their resources for their PEOPLE NOT SOME ZIONI PIGLETS WETHER HE IS FROM ANYWHERE INCLUDING GCC...

Well, I agree on the co-operation and defence production part. Afghanistan is the most turbulant place on earth to put a defence industry. If in doubt, ask the Brits, Soviets and Americans.

 

[AZ_HighCountry]

Iran is not attacking Saudi Arabia, Iran is attacking American installations, weapons and American military personnel in Saudi Arabia.

The distinction is important.

That is a very thin line distinction. US installations in the KSA other than the Embassy are hosted on Saudi sovereign territory. The Kingdom is the host nation.

 

[Ali_Baba]

That is a very thin line distinction. US installations in the KSA other than the Embassy are hosted on Saudi sovereign territory. The Kingdom is the host nation.

These installations are actively involved in hostilities against Iran. We have seen American assets operating from Saudi like refuellers, drones and EW equipment. That makes them legitimate targets.

 

[AZ_HighCountry]

These installations are actively involved in hostilities against Iran. We have seen American assets operating from Saudi like refuellers, drones and EW equipment. That makes them legitimate targets.

Not disputing that. Am challenging the assertion that Iran is not attacking KSA when attacking US installations. That's why I pointed out that outside of the US Embassy, Iran most certainly is attacking KSA. The distinction being US bases as opposed to say Saudi bases. But it is still an attack on KSA nonetheless.

 

[Arash]

View attachment 187485
That's the mentality Iran and world is dealing with.

Yeah but he probably meant other things by "plug"

 

[Ali_Baba]

Not disputing that. Am challenging the assertion that Iran is not attacking KSA when attacking US installations. That's why I pointed out that outside of the US Embassy, Iran most certainly is attacking KSA. The distinction being US bases as opposed to say Saudi bases. But it is still an attack on KSA nonetheless.

I am sure a legal expert would be better placed to thread this needle on the distinction under the articles of war and what is or isn’t allowed.

 

[ToddE]

That is a very thin line distinction. US installations in the KSA other than the Embassy are hosted on Saudi sovereign territory. The Kingdom is the host nation.

Their soil, with their open will, is being used by enemy engaged in war with Iran, bombing our children. US (enemy of Iran in a hot war) assets in that land are being physically supported by Saudi government by providing them bases, airspace, water, food, support staff and what not. USAF refuelers, EW, drones are constantly operating out of KSA territory. Thats makes them a legitmiate party in the war.

What are you finding hard in this simple logic to understand ?

 

[brazensword]

That is a very thin line distinction. US installations in the KSA other than the Embassy are hosted on Saudi sovereign territory. The Kingdom is the host nation.

That makes the Kingdom complicit in any hostilities. Allowing bomber and refueling / logistic overflights has established that fact earlier so not sure why this is up to any debate.