Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I believe
1. The concept of STRETIGIC DEPTH in AFGHANISTAN is where Pakistan and Iran meet, converge and are mutual in context of security. As Israel/India trying to use it against both Pakistan and Iran.
2. Pakistan Iran share enough resources within themselves to become a powerhouse.
3. This powerhouse is backed up by almost 2 million strong armed forces not as a showpieces but capable of fighting.
4. Afghanistan is landlocked and also have resources and can be helped through giving them fair share.
LET PIA BE BACK IN BUSINESS
PAKISTAN IRAN AFGHANISTAN...
Why you gonna let ZIONIST tap into resources that belong to the people that live in the region who are Muslims and it's duty of both countries to safeguard their resources for their PEOPLE NOT SOME ZIONI PIGLETS WETHER HE IS FROM ANYWHERE INCLUDING GCC...
That is a very thin line distinction. US installations in the KSA other than the Embassy are hosted on Saudi sovereign territory. The Kingdom is the host nation.Iran is not attacking Saudi Arabia, Iran is attacking American installations, weapons and American military personnel in Saudi Arabia.
The distinction is important.
That is a very thin line distinction. US installations in the KSA other than the Embassy are hosted on Saudi sovereign territory. The Kingdom is the host nation.
Not disputing that. Am challenging the assertion that Iran is not attacking KSA when attacking US installations. That's why I pointed out that outside of the US Embassy, Iran most certainly is attacking KSA. The distinction being US bases as opposed to say Saudi bases. But it is still an attack on KSA nonetheless.These installations are actively involved in hostilities against Iran. We have seen American assets operating from Saudi like refuellers, drones and EW equipment. That makes them legitimate targets.
Yeah but he probably meant other things by "plug"View attachment 187485
That's the mentality Iran and world is dealing with.
Not disputing that. Am challenging the assertion that Iran is not attacking KSA when attacking US installations. That's why I pointed out that outside of the US Embassy, Iran most certainly is attacking KSA. The distinction being US bases as opposed to say Saudi bases. But it is still an attack on KSA nonetheless.
That is a very thin line distinction. US installations in the KSA other than the Embassy are hosted on Saudi sovereign territory. The Kingdom is the host nation.
That makes the Kingdom complicit in any hostilities. Allowing bomber and refueling / logistic overflights has established that fact earlier so not sure why this is up to any debate.That is a very thin line distinction. US installations in the KSA other than the Embassy are hosted on Saudi sovereign territory. The Kingdom is the host nation.
Brits, Soviet and Americans brought with them GUNS and Afghans Saw them as enemy so natural instinct to fight back...Well, I agree on the co-operation and defence production part. Afghanistan is the most turbulant place on earth to put a defence industry. If in doubt, ask the Brits, Soviets and Americans.
that logic cuts both ways when the US uses those bases/territory to attack Iran.That is a very thin line distinction. US installations in the KSA other than the Embassy are hosted on Saudi sovereign territory. The Kingdom is the host nation.
dude the levels these diaspora go to
iranians here what do you call these traitors , like you guys must have a name for them
because i feel bad to call them iranians or persian , stain on that name
Are the interceptors running low? Or Iran has switched to striking the lowly defended cities like Arad?