Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

UKBengali said:
Pakistan needs to look at this through a medium and long term perspective.

Reliance on the Gulf puppet regimes is actually making things worse for Pakistan and countries like Bangladesh as they are a "back stop" to poor economic governance.

Yes things will be worse in the short-term but Iranian destruction of GCC energy facilities and economy will actually make things better in long term for Muslim world in general.

KSA is actively helping Zio-US attack Iran through basing and over-fly rights and so Iran has every right to attack KSA.
Click to expand...

Iran is not attacking Saudi Arabia, Iran is attacking American installations, weapons and American military personnel in Saudi Arabia.

The distinction is important.
 
omegalamba7xl9 said:
I believe
1. The concept of STRETIGIC DEPTH in AFGHANISTAN is where Pakistan and Iran meet, converge and are mutual in context of security. As Israel/India trying to use it against both Pakistan and Iran.
2. Pakistan Iran share enough resources within themselves to become a powerhouse.
3. This powerhouse is backed up by almost 2 million strong armed forces not as a showpieces but capable of fighting.
4. Afghanistan is landlocked and also have resources and can be helped through giving them fair share.

LET PIA BE BACK IN BUSINESS
PAKISTAN IRAN AFGHANISTAN...
Why you gonna let ZIONIST tap into resources that belong to the people that live in the region who are Muslims and it's duty of both countries to safeguard their resources for their PEOPLE NOT SOME ZIONI PIGLETS WETHER HE IS FROM ANYWHERE INCLUDING GCC...
Click to expand...

Well, I agree on the co-operation and defence production part. Afghanistan is the most turbulant place on earth to put a defence industry. If in doubt, ask the Brits, Soviets and Americans.
 
Ali_Baba said:
Iran is not attacking Saudi Arabia, Iran is attacking American installations, weapons and American military personnel in Saudi Arabia.

The distinction is important.
Click to expand...
That is a very thin line distinction. US installations in the KSA other than the Embassy are hosted on Saudi sovereign territory. The Kingdom is the host nation.
 
AZ_HighCountry said:
That is a very thin line distinction. US installations in the KSA other than the Embassy are hosted on Saudi sovereign territory. The Kingdom is the host nation.
Click to expand...

These installations are actively involved in hostilities against Iran. We have seen American assets operating from Saudi like refuellers, drones and EW equipment. That makes them legitimate targets.
 
Ali_Baba said:
These installations are actively involved in hostilities against Iran. We have seen American assets operating from Saudi like refuellers, drones and EW equipment. That makes them legitimate targets.
Click to expand...
Not disputing that. Am challenging the assertion that Iran is not attacking KSA when attacking US installations. That's why I pointed out that outside of the US Embassy, Iran most certainly is attacking KSA. The distinction being US bases as opposed to say Saudi bases. But it is still an attack on KSA nonetheless.
 
AZ_HighCountry said:
Not disputing that. Am challenging the assertion that Iran is not attacking KSA when attacking US installations. That's why I pointed out that outside of the US Embassy, Iran most certainly is attacking KSA. The distinction being US bases as opposed to say Saudi bases. But it is still an attack on KSA nonetheless.
Click to expand...

I am sure a legal expert would be better placed to thread this needle on the distinction under the articles of war and what is or isn’t allowed.
 
AZ_HighCountry said:
That is a very thin line distinction. US installations in the KSA other than the Embassy are hosted on Saudi sovereign territory. The Kingdom is the host nation.
Click to expand...

Their soil, with their open will, is being used by enemy engaged in war with Iran, bombing our children. US (enemy of Iran in a hot war) assets in that land are being physically supported by Saudi government by providing them bases, airspace, water, food, support staff and what not. USAF refuelers, EW, drones are constantly operating out of KSA territory. Thats makes them a legitmiate party in the war.

What are you finding hard in this simple logic to understand ?
 
AZ_HighCountry said:
That is a very thin line distinction. US installations in the KSA other than the Embassy are hosted on Saudi sovereign territory. The Kingdom is the host nation.
Click to expand...
That makes the Kingdom complicit in any hostilities. Allowing bomber and refueling / logistic overflights has established that fact earlier so not sure why this is up to any debate.
 
Bengal71 said:
Well, I agree on the co-operation and defence production part. Afghanistan is the most turbulant place on earth to put a defence industry. If in doubt, ask the Brits, Soviets and Americans.
Click to expand...
Brits, Soviet and Americans brought with them GUNS and Afghans Saw them as enemy so natural instinct to fight back...
However When they see DANDA/SOTA (Stick wrapped in duct tape).. their that is Afghans childhood trauma kicks in and natural instinct is to RUN.. We all know the childhood traumas o slippers and DANDAS from Moms..... 😂
Or dad showing up at a cricket field with it ... 😂
 
hasssanali8998 said:


dude the levels these diaspora go to
iranians here what do you call these traitors , like you guys must have a name for them
because i feel bad to call them iranians or persian , stain on that name
Click to expand...


Many are just made up accounts/identities. Entire diaspora is not Pahlavist.

Some are on payroll, some just retarded. Who gives shit, they dont matter. not anymore.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 1 more.
    • Total: 143 (members: 5, guests: 138)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top