Kyussis
Trusted Member
First images of the landing zone of the C-130s and their remains after being destroyed by U.S. forces during evac
The "stuck in the mud" story is looking like BS!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
First images of the landing zone of the C-130s and their remains after being destroyed by U.S. forces during evac
Only Chinese have capabilities they have
And us has fought goat herders these past 30 years... Iran haven't fought a real war since 1980s.... And still is effective enoughChinese military hasn’t fought an actual war since Korea. On paper based on toys and equipment and industrial capacity they are a near power adversary to the U.S. military especially over next decade.
However, Look at how rusty the Russian military command was in Ukraine war, despite having a prior successful military campaign in Ukraine 2014 and Georgia 2008.
First images of the landing zone of the C-130s and their remains after being destroyed by U.S. forces during evac
Does Luxembourg have an air force?Airforce is mandatory even it be a weakest one
whats the update on pilot? rescued,captured or dead?They will say anything now. Nothing succeeds like success.
Iran did spend billions on the air force over the years. We developed like countles A2A missiles. Take the Fakour-90 as example.
Iran did spend billions in its navy over the years. We build an entire navy, so it can be sunk in ports?
That is my point. It was all a waste, at least in the context of a defensive war.
I actually tried to run some calculations on your statement to get a ballpark of what can be achieved. Let's assume that each IR-9 has a SWU of 30 per year.
So, based on what I remembered and double-checked, each cascade of Iran's IR-1, IR-2 and IR-6 centrifuges included 164 machines, typically arranged in 30-40 stages and 2-8 machines in parallel.
Since SWU is approximately additive, for IR-9, the total SWU of such a hypothetical configuration would approximately be 4,920 SWU/year. You have two cascades, therefore you get 9,840 SWU/year.
Now you need to compute the total SWU required for enriching that uranium from 3.5% to 90%, assuming a typical tail assay of 0.25%. I cheated here and used Microsoft's copilot for this. The answer is 24,450 SWU. Hence, the time needed for enriching 3.5% LEU into 90% HEU is about 2.47 years. That's about 2 years, 5 months, 2 weeks and 5 days!
-----------------------------------
That aside, even if we assume that Iran has the capability to enrich its LEU stockpile to HEU in less than a month, we'll still have the issue of converting our stockpile from UF6 gas into the uranium metal.
Iran was feeding its HALEU (20%) stockpile into its centrifuges, not its 3.5% LEU.Not sure where you got your math from:
In a Dec. 26 report, the IAEA noted that Iran is now producing approximately nine kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 percent uranium-235 per month. Iran was producing 60 percent enriched U-235 at a similar rate in early 2023, but decreased production by about two-thirds in June. (See ACT, October 2023.)
It’s even faster to get to 90% once you past the 3.5% mark. And Iran has some amounts at 20% already, so the sprint to 90% will be very short.
In 2023 Iran was making 10KG per month of 60% grade using only a couple of IR-4 cascades if I recall correctly.
NOTE: Also Co-pilot won’t provide you accurate timelines since that be saying aiding nuclear weapons research. AI safety guardrails will kick in.
But the chances Iran would get the pilot after the first 4-6 hours dropped dramatically given the remote location and needing to bring in forces from other surrounding areas. In these types of scenarios, Iran needs to be on the scene in just a few hours before spec ops can get a plan and fly out, while US chain of command is still processing.