Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Your claim has bene debunked by NYT.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


🤦Yes they were involved, so were the Iranians. Who do you think added the line "includes Lebanon" part, you think the US wanted to add that. Another exhibit of indian hatred clouding common sense. Stop with this f'in obsession already. Maybe all of the thinking ability of your nation is taken up with thinking of new irrelevant answers to the question "How many jets did India lose". Learn to count to 7 already.
 
Dawn News: statement by GoP:

"Pakistan strongly condemned the ongoing Israeli aggression against Lebanon, calling it a serious violation of international law.

In a statement on X, the Foreign Office (FO) said, “The Israeli action undermines international efforts to establish peace and stability in the region and constitutes a blatant violation of international law and fundamental humanitarian principles.”

The statement added that Pakistan calls upon the international community to take “urgent and concrete steps” to end Israeli aggression against Lebanon. "
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Iranian media is censoring anti ceasefire rhetoric from protestors

They are doing it right. Everyone should give peace a chance even when we all know it won't hold for long.

I am sure there will be something for Lebanon during the upcoming talks between Iran and the United States. I am sure Iranians are good negotiators won't leave their friends in time of need. A couple of more days and everything will be crystal clear.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Midget really wants to be the center of attention.

He is Jewish, has to be the centre of the Universe.
 
Agreed, but this one is a good Pakistani :)
This tweet makes her sound like a moron. Only reason she said such thing is because she lives in UK and is not in any danger from any retaliation that would befall Pakistan if such a threat was carried out the way she wants it.

Women! Am I right fellas? :rolleyes:
 
Late Ali Khamenei issued a religious decree and declared nukes impermissible. The basis for that decree makes sense to some extent if you consider the mass destruction and harm it could bring to innocent civilian population.

Did he ever say or mention anything about closure of strait of Hormuz?

Because if you look at it, the end result is basically same (obviously on drastically varied scales but in religious terms a harm to civilian population is a harm).

Hasn't iran nullified his decree already in a way?

Besides the premise... once a nuke has been built, fielded and used... the onus has to be on it's deterrent value and not the destruction it causes... the genie is out of the bottle already.
And all you're doing is exposing yourself to it's consequences but not the reciprocal value it's endows the wielder. Which is why I strongly(dotards word) believe that a country with significant population and resources in a dog eat dog world ushered in by European colonial enterprises... as an instrument of destruction, not only of your civilization but to drain you off your resources!... should have nukes.
The US and zionist examples are the two still unfolding ones on the stage... both with impunity, sabotage, blackmail, non adherence to any conventions... nuclear or international law... impunity and recklessness, disregard for human life.

One must be really shielded or in a bubble to assume the bright side of real world consequences. Something that the west rewarded Iran in response to it's dithering... It cannot go without saying for the umpteenth time "THEY STARTED THIS WAR BY MURDERING THE ONE PERSON WHO STOPPED IRAN FROM GOING NUCLEAR!" make that make sense.
That you cannot make this judgement for your people ... unless you wish to become a victim of it... in this case Iran did. That puny little rats tail needs to be pounded till it mimics the pavement. Literally hundreds of thousands if not millions have paid the price for those who dithered on the very basic premise, safety of whom they were endowed to secure... it seems it is Baghdad all over for Muslims every few centuries... Mongols or mongrels! Just coming in and undoing those sleeping at the helm... the cushy life under the sun very easily becomes the new elixir, when devoid of any other... in hot burning sun of the desert and mirages all around.

So, back to the nuclear! Yes back to it and every thing out there in the toolkit for there just cannot be a repeat. Send polak packing!
 
Last edited:
Oh boy, what do you think would happen when they killed Khamenei???.
IMO That was a diversion to work on Greater Israel Project.
The major hurdles were
Syria : Taken care by removal of Assad.
Iran : Attacked and Top leadership removed.
Lebanon : invasion coming soon.
 
There will be no lifting of the US sanctions unless this war is over.

Iran and the US have to fight for months until one side gives up. The ceasefire was a gross mistake.
If Iran makes the world suffer, the world will return the favor. This war isn't just about military force—it’s a strategic chess game. Iran needs to show some sincerity. That way, even if they keep up their current strategy, the countries that want to support them actually have a legit reason to do so.

They can't afford to have the whole world against them. They need to make sure the global narrative is that Iran tried everything they could, and that the US and Israel are the ones sabotaging the peace.
 
I dare say that the Iranian leadership is not just incompetent, but has committed betrayal. Even if a ceasefire tantamount to a surrender is necessary, why not use these 14 days to fully prepare for battle by moving key figures to underground command centers, stockpiling supplies, reinforcing troops on the front lines, and mobilizing reserves? If Iran shows such preparations, the Ebstein coalition will hesitate to invade again. Why do they do nothing? Why do they only show a weak stance to avoid provoking the enemy? For the sake of peace, it is necessary to show a willingness to fight. A defenseless stance invites invasion and threatens the lives of Iranian children. Can someone explain to me why the mullahs cannot understand something so simple?
 
Your claim has bene debunked by NYT.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Again , what is the issue here? Desperate to make one i get that
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top