hasssanali8998
Elite Member
also if the war starts again pakistan has to make it very clear to iran that their will be consequence if they target the PAF contingent in KSA .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What a joke.So this man is supposed to take Tehran in 2 months
View attachment 196829
View attachment 196844
View attachment 196845
Pakistan and Iranian Foreign Ministers held Phone calls with Saudi Foreign Minister.
i assume UAE is the small fish ??eat the small ones
Iran produces 100 ballistic missiles per month or 1200 missiles that can reach Israel per year.
Since Iran launched 2181 ballistic missiles (MRBMs and SRBMs) during the 40 Day War and CIA says Iran still has 70% of its pre-war arsenal, we can say that before the war Iran had more than 7200 ballistic missiles in total.
Based on Israeli report from 20.02.2026 that says Iran produces 100 missiles per month (1200 missiles per year) and can have 5000 ballistic missiles that can reach Israel by 2027, we can estimate that out of these 7200 ballistic missiles 3800 missiles were MRBMs and 3400 missiles were SRBMs.
![]()
Israel racing to curb Iran missile surge, warns 'no airtight solution' to thousands of rockets
IDF officials estimate Iran could possess at least 5,000 ballistic missiles by 2027, producing about 100 per month, and say layered air defenses cannot fully prevent damage from sustained, large-scale barrageswww.ynetnews.com
During the 40 Day War Iran launched 2181 ballistic missiles of which 700 MRBMs at Israel and Jordan and 1481 SRBMs at Gulf countries.
So, currently Iran has 3100 MRBMs and 1919 SRBMs = 5019 ballistic missiles in total.
With this arsenal Iran can continue fighting for another 92 days.
Iran will never run out of missiles unless the bases are blown upYou place way too much importance in what some people say.
Nobody knows how much Iran already produced and nobody knows how much Iran can produce.....regardless on what Iranian or non-Iranian officials say, we will never know what is going on in tunnels and under mountains.
i assume UAE is the small fish ??
True, but then he will just move on to his next goal's/demands.
Just rinse and repeat with Benni, never staisfied.
America will do his/Israel's/The Zionist's bidding like always. A sick situation.
70 days of complete digital blackout. That's at least $4.9 billion down the drain. The upper estimate is $5.6 billion, and counting... If this situation stays the same for a year, that will add up to $27 billion. Almost half of our oil exports with peak price and peak volume of export.
Add to it over half a million layoffs in the IT sector in the past 3 months, half a million and counting. Yet, some people here think that Iran is winning... lol
The Ayatollahs have managed to shrink Iran's nominal GDP from $500 billion in 2010 to $125 billion in 2025 and now they plan to wipe out another $30-$50 billion from Iran's already destroyed economy. For a better comparison, Iran's population in 2010 was 77 million and it's 93 million now.
My reply was a general reply to Netanyahu and his lifetime agenda of making sure any Muslim nation let alone Iran obtaining Nuclear technology which they do not control/have access to directly or indirectly.Really? Tell me which POTUS before Trump had allowed a direct attack on Iran despite decades of similar Mossad/Netanyahu 'presentations' given to the Presidents before Trump II? Which American President had ceded the Golan Heights to Israel, made Jerusalem Israel's capital, and killed a high stature person like Suleimani? And those actions were done under Trump's first term of relative 'peace' in the Middle East. The personality of a US President is playing an outsized role by openly throwing away the checks and balances of the past and there is no stopping it. Biden was worse, Trump is the worst.
Sorry to say but your kinds of posts is the reason the Middle East is in a mess. Your kind of posts don't take into considerations the actions of American Presidents due to personal biases of the POTUS, the comparative hold of AIPAC on both American political parties, the 'vote bank' biases between the two main American political parties. And you seem oblivious of the changing political winds in America where even former MAGAs are distancing from the war on Iran and where 38 out of 50 some Democratic Senators recently voted to block arm sales to Israel.
Change in the Middle East and indeed in the world is going come from change in American policies and policies are drafted by politicians and for them to change policies, in a democracy like America, critical thinking, smart politics, and voting with brain matters--and not falling for a Republican plant like the Green Party's candidate Jill Stein to divide the Progressive vote.
Other American President like you mentioned may not have directly or indirectly attacked Iran or other Muslim majority countries, but there action's like using UN veto's has led to harm not only to Iran but other Muslim population's like Palestine by Israel and Zionist's.
Trump just had the ball's to do it openly, the other's just did it privately.
I know that.This post of me as well as the post you quoted of me are not a personal note to you
Qaddafi killing and Syria civil war was under Obama administration, more hypocrite than Trump, less blatant but same rogue behavior.Really? Tell me which POTUS before Trump had allowed a direct attack on Iran despite decades of similar Mossad/Netanyahu 'presentations' given to the Presidents before Trump II? Which American President had ceded the Golan Heights to Israel, made Jerusalem Israel's capital, and killed a high stature person like Suleimani? And those actions were done under Trump's first term of relative 'peace' in the Middle East. The personality of a US President is playing an outsized role by openly throwing away the checks and balances of the past and there is no stopping it. Biden was worse, Trump is the worst.
Sorry to say but your kinds of posts is the reason the Middle East is in a mess. Your kind of posts don't take into considerations the actions of American Presidents due to personal biases of the POTUS, the comparative hold of AIPAC on both American political parties, the 'vote bank' biases between the two main American political parties. And you seem oblivious of the changing political winds in America where even former MAGAs are distancing from the war on Iran and where 38 out of 50 some Democratic Senators recently voted to block arm sales to Israel.
Change in the Middle East and indeed in the world is going come from change in American policies and policies are drafted by politicians and for them to change policies, in a democracy like America, critical thinking, smart politics, and voting with brain matters--and not falling for a Republican plant like the Green Party's candidate Jill Stein to divide the Progressive vote.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.