Shags101
Trusted Member
I don’t think it’s going to be a 30 to 20 missiles salute this time they the Israelis to understand the equation has changed the Iranians will sign the agreement but it might take an extra few days
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Absolute top drawer perspective. Several very hard realities here that dilly dallyers need to be cognisant of.Perhaps that is for the best, don't you think? People argued that Iran was reluctant to hit high-value targets in Israel because they feared a nuclear response. Turns out that the Iranian leadership deliberately spared important war assets even in neighbouring Arab countries like Bahrain. This was not due to a terrible 'target bank' as some people has been claiming ever since; they did it fully on purpose. Maybe Israel pushing Iran to fight is the better solution for Tehran in the longterm. Who knows?
The average neolib in the US claims that Iran has always won at the negotiating table and lost in a conflict which is a myth, propaganda. Throughout this on and off war the Iranian state gained the upper hand almost always when they decisively fought back.
This is why I always make it a point to explain to others that Turkey's forceful intervention in Northern Cyprus during the Cold War was a crucial moment in our post-WWII timeline, where we forged a credible deterrent in the eye of the White man and by extension Israel.
I don’t think it’s going to be a 30 to 20 missiles salute this time they the Israelis to understand the equation has changed the Iranians will sign the agreement but it might take an extra few days
This stand off between Iran and Israel will NOT END BY HALF MEASURES.
Now Iran may well choose to buy time, which nobody would criticise them for, but that will come at a cost - the cost may well be Hezbollah and arguably, the whole of Lebanon. This is a difficult choice to have to make.
I think what the post is actually say Bibi hopes Iran responds to have the agreement to collapse
What do you want ? A resumption of this pointless war ? The only remaining issue left is the severely bruised Israeli / American egos and their attempt to have the final word and blow.View attachment 201702
Watch them shoot 7 missiles and call it a day
very good strategy.The agreement does not have to collapse. Iran can formally say, in light of ceasefire violations, the signing will be delayed for 2 weeks etc. Then Iran can decide if they want to militarily retaliate or not. Make this compliance issue Trumps problem as well, not just Iran's alone.
What do you want ? A resumption of this pointless war ? The only remaining issues left is the severely bruised Israeli / American egos and their attempt to have the final word and blow.
I agree, Israel will not withdraw without concessions from Hezbollah. But this is not realistic at this point. A full ceasefire on the current lines of control is a superior position than the ceasefire Hezbollah had to accept in 2024, where Hezbollah was in disarray and Israel had free reign to bomb Lebanon and kill 400 Hezbollah members without a response.This statement doesn't demand "Israeli" withdrawal from South Lebanon. And based on the "Israeli" and Lebanese govts' agreement - brokered by the US, this occupation of South Lebanon can only end when Hezbollah is disarmed.
Hezbollah, as a resistance group, doesn't want to accept this framework. They are, therefore, continuing the military pressure and keep hitting the Zionist occupying forces. "Israelis" on their part are now regarding every attack on their forces in South Lebanon as an attack on Northern "Israel". So they keep attacking Dahieh in order to derail the ceasefire and legitimize the occupation of South Lebanon.
At the end, it all depends on how far Iran is willing to push to ensure "Israel" withdrawal from South Lebanon.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.