European Storm Shadow Missiles Fail as Saudi Eurofighters Attempt Strike on Yemen’s Main Airport

hussain0216

Elite Member
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
30,921
Reaction score
49,481
Reputation
13,286.1
Country of Origin
Country of Residence
European Storm Shadow Missiles Fail as Saudi Eurofighters Attempt Strike on Yemen’s Main Airport


Middle East , Missile and Space
Military Watch Magazine Editorial Staff
July-16th-2026


Eurofighter and Storm Shadow Missile
Eurofighter and Storm Shadow Missile
The Royal Saudi Air Force launched a failed cruise missile strike on Sana’a International Airport in Yemen, with its apparent objective of disabling the airport’s runway having not been achieved as multiple British-supplied Storm Shadow cruise missiles missed their target. Approximately ten Storm Shadow missiles were launched from long ranges by Saudi Eurofighters in an attempt to render the runway unusable, but the attack reportedly failed to inflict decisive damage sufficient to shut down operations. The operation represents a notable setback for Europe’s primary air-launched cruise missile type.

Royal Saudi Air Force Eurofighter
Royal Saudi Air Force Eurofighter


The Storm Shadow was jointly developed by the United Kingdom and France, and was designed to penetrate heavily defended airspace before striking high-value targets with precision. Carrying a BROACH tandem warhead specifically intended to destroy hardened infrastructure, the missile has been widely promoted for attacks against bunkers, command centres, and airfield facilities. A coordinated strike involving around ten missiles would represent an expenditure of roughly $20 million worth of precision-guided munitions. The missiles have been extensively used in combat in the Ukrainian theatre, albeit with mixed results, as Russian electronic warfare systems have reportedly achieved significant successes.



Storm Shadow Cruise Missile Crashed in the Ukrainian Theatre - Reportedly After Electronic Warfare Disruption
Storm Shadow Cruise Missile Crashed in the Ukrainian Theatre - Reportedly After Electronic Warfare Disruption

Runways are often difficult targets to disable permanently. Although precision weapons can crater the surface, military engineers can frequently repair damage within hours unless repeated strikes are conducted or critical supporting infrastructure such as taxiways, fuel storage, maintenance facilities, and aircraft shelters are also destroyed. Nevertheless, Storm Shadow’s specialised warhead was specifically designed to inflict severe structural damage, making the reported inability to decisively disable the runway a noteworthy outcome if confirmed.

Storm Shadow Cruise Missile
Storm Shadow Cruise Missile

The reported launch profile is also significant. Rather than approaching closer to the target, the attacking aircraft reportedly remained at maximum stand-off range before releasing their missiles. Such tactics minimise the risk to strike aircraft but may also reflect concerns about the threat posed by Yemeni air defence systems. Over the course of the conflict, Yemen’s air defence capabilities have evolved into a more sophisticated and increasingly integrated network capable of posing a greater challenge to hostile aircraft operating near its airspace. They have been responsible for shooting down multiple fighters and drones operated by the U.S. Armed Forces and Western Bloc strategic partners in the region, including Saudi Eurofighters and F-15s.
 
Aren't runways easily repairable unless you use special munitions that punch a deep hole ? The Storm Shadow has been extensively used in Ukraine with very good results.
 
European Storm Shadow Missiles Fail as Saudi Eurofighters Attempt Strike on Yemen’s Main Airport


Middle East , Missile and Space
Military Watch Magazine Editorial Staff
July-16th-2026


Eurofighter and Storm Shadow Missile
Eurofighter and Storm Shadow Missile
The Royal Saudi Air Force launched a failed cruise missile strike on Sana’a International Airport in Yemen, with its apparent objective of disabling the airport’s runway having not been achieved as multiple British-supplied Storm Shadow cruise missiles missed their target. Approximately ten Storm Shadow missiles were launched from long ranges by Saudi Eurofighters in an attempt to render the runway unusable, but the attack reportedly failed to inflict decisive damage sufficient to shut down operations. The operation represents a notable setback for Europe’s primary air-launched cruise missile type.

Royal Saudi Air Force Eurofighter
Royal Saudi Air Force Eurofighter


The Storm Shadow was jointly developed by the United Kingdom and France, and was designed to penetrate heavily defended airspace before striking high-value targets with precision. Carrying a BROACH tandem warhead specifically intended to destroy hardened infrastructure, the missile has been widely promoted for attacks against bunkers, command centres, and airfield facilities. A coordinated strike involving around ten missiles would represent an expenditure of roughly $20 million worth of precision-guided munitions. The missiles have been extensively used in combat in the Ukrainian theatre, albeit with mixed results, as Russian electronic warfare systems have reportedly achieved significant successes.



Storm Shadow Cruise Missile Crashed in the Ukrainian Theatre - Reportedly After Electronic Warfare Disruption
Storm Shadow Cruise Missile Crashed in the Ukrainian Theatre - Reportedly After Electronic Warfare Disruption

Runways are often difficult targets to disable permanently. Although precision weapons can crater the surface, military engineers can frequently repair damage within hours unless repeated strikes are conducted or critical supporting infrastructure such as taxiways, fuel storage, maintenance facilities, and aircraft shelters are also destroyed. Nevertheless, Storm Shadow’s specialised warhead was specifically designed to inflict severe structural damage, making the reported inability to decisively disable the runway a noteworthy outcome if confirmed.

Storm Shadow Cruise Missile
Storm Shadow Cruise Missile

The reported launch profile is also significant. Rather than approaching closer to the target, the attacking aircraft reportedly remained at maximum stand-off range before releasing their missiles. Such tactics minimise the risk to strike aircraft but may also reflect concerns about the threat posed by Yemeni air defence systems. Over the course of the conflict, Yemen’s air defence capabilities have evolved into a more sophisticated and increasingly integrated network capable of posing a greater challenge to hostile aircraft operating near its airspace. They have been responsible for shooting down multiple fighters and drones operated by the U.S. Armed Forces and Western Bloc strategic partners in the region, including Saudi Eurofighters and F-15s.
They hit their targets, considering that is what was fed to the GNC. But as the article states, runways can be repaired quickly.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Just like it failed in operation Sindoor....Loads were intercepted fired from Indian jets.

View attachment 206544
View attachment 206545
Yeah (one) "intercepted", with no burn or shrapnel marks and intact warhead.
 
They hit their targets, considering that is what was fed to the GNC. But as the article states, runways can be repaired quickly.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Yeah (one) "intercepted", with no burn or shrapnel marks and intact warhead.

Make up your mind - did it hit the runways to be shown in photographs or did the PAF repair runways quickly?
And if there is no burn or shrapnel marks - that is called a systems failure OR simply combination of spoofing and targeted signal jamming that led it well off target and the missile eventually ran out of fuel..

But knowing Bhaktoras - they would rather eat dung than admit Pakistan could actually spoof their most advanced system.

Actually, they would rather eat dung... 🤔.. its not even offensive to them.
 
Just like it failed in operation Sindoor....Loads were intercepted fired from Indian jets.

View attachment 206544
View attachment 206545
Actually they had a near perfect record - most of the successful strikes India had was due to SCALP including Bholari.

Other than Brahmos that hit Rafiqui and RYK - the rest of them missed by miles at times and some went going onto FATA and beyond.
 
Make up your mind - did it hit the runways to be shown in photographs or did the PAF repair runways quickly?
And if there is no burn or shrapnel marks - that is called a systems failure OR simply combination of spoofing and targeted signal jamming that led it well off target and the missile eventually ran out of fuel..
Yes, cruise missiles fail often due to single use turbojets. There's no 2nd engine for redundancy and the engine itself isn't made of top notch alloys since it is expendable.

Spoof with what? What kinda spoofing stops one missile but not the other in the salvo? Cruise missiles have a lot of ways to navigate and don't rely entirely on GNSS. The fact that a Harop managed to hit Sargodha (radar?) speaks volumes about advanced selective jamming.
But knowing Bhaktoras - they would rather eat dung than admit Pakistan could actually spoof their most advanced system.

Actually, they would rather eat dung... 🤔.. its not even offensive to them.
You already eat it saar, i mean why do you think you're the last remaining place with polio along with war torn Taliban run Afghanistan 🤷🏻

Like whom do i report when the mods themselves act as trolls unprovoked, khair...
Actually they had a near perfect record - most of the successful strikes India had was due to SCALP including Bholari.
SCALP was used at Nur Khan and Sargodha is the best we know.
Other than Brahmos that hit Rafiqui and RYK - the rest of them missed by miles at times and some went going onto FATA and beyond.
Trust me bro.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top