Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Immortals said:
Iran is still using inventory it built from 2010-2015.

Assuming Iran had 7500 missiles (hypothetical random guess) when this conflict started, it should still have 50%+ remaining with no new production needed.

So no, there is no evidence of Chinese assistance currently for manufacturing NEW missiles. Iran is still using old inventory mixed with some newer gen missiles.

You forget Iran has been building missiles for 25 years for this very war.
Click to expand...
True number of iranian missiles is itself a big mystery.
 
Immortals said:
Iran is still using inventory it built from 2010-2015.

Assuming Iran had 7500 missiles (hypothetical random guess) when this conflict started, it should still have 50%+ remaining with no new production needed.

So no, there is no evidence of Chinese assistance currently for manufacturing NEW missiles. Iran is still using old inventory mixed with some newer gen missiles.

You forget Iran has been building missiles for 25 years for this very war.
Click to expand...

Why would Iran not be manufacturing new missiles if it could ? We have seen posts on this thread of new missiles, new designs being tested and deployed, and that implies manufacturing sites and supply line that many include external suppliers.
 
Immortals said:
It is not a cultural that you can “immigrate” to like Japan or U.S. or Europe. It’s not simple as opening your borders and everyone comes in. If such a Policy were that easy then Europe wouldn’t have negative population growth despite allowing in millions of Arabs, Africans, and Indians.

China, like many Asian countries, has an inverted demographics pyramid. 1 child and 2 child policies of the old days have engrained into people’s mind to have low offspring. That’s not reversing. This is a global problem not just attributed to China. But the problem is exacerbated by lack of any meaningful immigration into China to offset this.



60-70% of a countries economic growth (GPD) is it citizens spending money (consumer spending). If its citizens are old and dying and not working then economic growth suffers as the labor pool gets smaller and smaller the working class doesn’t spend as much. Basic econ 101.



Putin won’t live forever you know. When he dies or retire, then what? A system built around 1 man. You don’t think the West has spies in that system to take control of Russia?.
Click to expand...
In the 1980s Spain immigration rate was less 1%, like China today.

Today is officially 20%, unofficially even more and in labor market could be even the half in some places.

Had Spain a culture for immigration in 80s? Of course not, but it was well brain washed since them, specially starting 21st century.

Anyway, my opinion is that speech of aging people and economy collapse is just a big lie made in jew-usa.
Just think how many people is needed to manufacture the basic consumption things in a industrialized country.

Here most of labor market is in the services.

To produce food, meds and basic subsistence things is needed less 10% population.

So aging people economic collapse my ass.
Another Jewish bullshit, that minority is comfortable in multicultural countries because in nation-state they always end chased and looted, so from USA power they have filled all western public narrative of that invented need for immigration.
 
Ali_Baba said:
Why would Iran not be manufacturing new missiles if it could ? We have seen posts on this thread of new missiles, new designs being tested and deployed, and that implies manufacturing sites and supply line that many include external suppliers.
Click to expand...

certainly

and I think they are using new solid state ballistic missiles

for drones like Shaheed -136 I dont think they will be running out anytime soon
 
lightning f57 said:
Im wondering what Iran means by expanding their attacks. So far it seems SA has had little to no attacks, Turkey has not been attacked at all, they have large US bases and facilities not far from Iran and Israel is not touched.
Click to expand...

- SA
- Israel
- UAE
- Qatar
- South Cyprus (hopefully)
 
Ali_Baba said:
Why would Iran not be manufacturing new missiles if it could ? We have seen posts on this thread of new missiles, new designs being tested and deployed, and that implies manufacturing sites and supply line that many include external suppliers.
Click to expand...

To manufacture a solid fuel missile there are several layers of facilities you need to prepare the fuel including large mixers. It’s possible Iran has been able to somehow do this either underground or in some hidden sites that are only activated during emergencies. However the rate of production would be low naturally.

Rubio once said at the start of the war that Iran could make 100 missiles a month while they made 10 interceptors a year.

So, assuming during peace time Iran could make 100 finished missiles a month (a respectable number compared to US/Russia/Ukraine), during war time that number probably drops to 25 at best maybe 50, at worst maybe 10 missiles. Issue is Iran is firing about 5-10 missiles a day during this current round of conflict. So it’s using 150-300 missiles per month at the current run rate if this conflict continues. So Iran would need 3000 missiles to cover itself for next 12 months of low intensity warfare or as many as 10,000 missiles if it goes back to firing 30-40 missiles a day in a flare up of high tempo operations.

Now in case of liquid fuel the problem is much easier since it’s simple mixing of fuels and the real difficulty is producing engines and warhead and subsystems etc.

The million dollar question is how many of its missile production facilities survived the 12 day war and opening salvo of the current war. And how much of it is moved underground or was underground to start?
 
Last edited:
Another site in Bahrain hit

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Immortals said:
To manufacture a solid fuel missile there are several layers of facilities you need to prepare the fuel including large mixers. It’s possible Iran has been able to somehow do this either underground or in some hidden sites that are only activated during emergencies. However the rate of production would be low naturally.

Rubio once said at the start of the war that Iran could make 100 missiles a month while they made 10 interceptors a year.

So, assuming during peace time Iran could make 100 finished missiles a month (a respectable number compared to US/Russia/Ukraine), during war time that number probably drops to 25 at best maybe 50, at worst maybe 10 missiles. Issue is Iran is firing about 5-10 missiles a day during this current round of conflict. So it’s using 150-300 missiles at the current run rate of this conflict continues. So Iran would need 3000 miles to cover itself for next 12 months of low intensity or as many as 10,000 missiles if it goes back to firing 30-40 missiles a day.

Now in case of liquid fuel the problem is much easier since it’s simple mixing of fuels and the real difficulty is producing engines and warhead and subsystems etc.

The million dollar question is how many of its missile production facilities survived the 12 day war and opening salvo of the current war. And how much of it is moved underground or was underground to start?
Click to expand...

Good analysis. Thanks.

The other factor is how much material that was produced and then stored has made it into the manufacturing pipeline.

As part of Iran's planning, they would have stored supplies of raw components for manufacturing to some depth that they could then convert to actual missiles etc.
 
Immortals said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...


What a dumb bitch reposting an article written by an indian because he does not has his own thoughts, Centcum already unloaded all they had in the initial phase of the war to the point that they ran out of their strategic ammo, what more can they bomb short of a nuke.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 3 more.
    • Total: 146 (members: 22, guests: 124)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top